NASA Doesn’t Know.

[The Starmaker]

How Big Are Those Killer Asteroids? ... NASA Doesn’t Know.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/asteroids-nathan-myhrvold-nasa.html?_r=0



I can tell you a lot of what..NASA Doesn’t Know.


but then you would call me a NAZA denier.

[The Starmaker]

For one,

NASA hasn't figured out What Happen To The Martians yet because they are
too busy trying to create water for them.


Do you know what a Martian fossil looks like????

[The Starmaker]

one thing I know about killer asteroids I've learned from studying
dinosaurs..

it's that an killer asteroid can be the size of a bee and still kill
you.

[Bast]

Nasa has no reason to provide answers.
They get paid for research,....as long as they say "we are still looking for
the answers", they get paid.
If they suddenly gave us all the answers they would be out of work.

Same reason that money going to cancer research will never provide a cure
for cancer.
Nobody wants to put themselves out of a nice lucrative cushy job.

[The Starmaker]

Bast wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > How Big Are Those Killer Asteroids? ... NASA Doesn't Know.
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/asteroids-nathan-myhrvold-nasa.html?_r=0
> >
> >
> >
> > I can tell you a lot of what..NASA Doesn't Know.
> >
> >
> > but then you would call me a NAZA denier.
>
> Nasa has no reason to provide answers.
> They get paid for research,....as long as they say "we are still looking for
> the answers", they get paid.
> If they suddenly gave us all the answers they would be out of work.

NASA people are not educated enought to come up with answers...they buy answers. Just like the F.B.I.

>
> Same reason that money going to cancer research will never provide a cure
> for cancer.
> Nobody wants to put themselves out of a nice lucrative cushy job.

The funding that goes into 'cancer research' simply draws members of the
'scientific community' to follow the money, cash the check while pretending to
do cancer research.

Albert Einstein spent almost ten years working at the patent office...is there any
evidence that he ...worked?

He learned how to file a patent.


Then he taught all his friends "How To File A Patent."


I wouldn't be surprised if they filed a patent on the ATOMIC BOMB!

[David Mitchell]

You're an idiot.

1) Cancer research is neither "lucrative", nor "cushy" for those
actually doing the work.
2) The prognosis for someone with cancer is infinitely better now than
even 20 years ago. Why do you think that is? Sorry, I know thinking
isn't your strong point: it's because of the research. That's how it works.
3) The people actually doing the research are almost all what one might
describe as "academics". Apart from the joy of learning, and the
knowledge that one is doing something worthwhile, the one thing which
academics prize above all is the respect of their peers. Having
published work cited and used is the way in which this is expressed. It
is absolutely, therefore, in their best interest to both do good work,
and to publish it.

The French have a saying: "A man does not look behind a door where he
would not hide himself"

I know you're not very bright, so I'll explain: for most people, the
first guide they have as to how others will behave is how they would
behave themselves. For some people, it's all they have, others draw on
wider sources. If you believe that a large number of people would take
vast amounts of money, much of it raised by charities, and fritter it
away whilst pretending to work, thus denying it to others who might,
perhaps, actually do the work, then you belive that large numbers of
people are immoral assholes.

I think that you see too much of yourself in other people.

In summary:
You're an idiot,
"Research" has raised the survival rate for most cancers from "fuck-all"
to "reasonable".
You're an immoral asshole.

[Bast]

Do you feel better now ?
So which do you work for?, Nasa, or the "medical" industry ?

People are still dying of cancer everyday,....no one has a better prognosis
than they did years ago, and far more people are being diagnosed with
cancer, than ever before.
It just costs more to keep them alive, for a bit longer. But they still die,
and the reaserch money machine, keeps pumping out more money
So your strawman arguments have no fact, to back them up at all.


Have a nice day,...shill
Now go eat some of that yummy GMO franken-food.

[ClutterFreak]

On Fri, 27 May 2016 05:31:58 +0100, David Mitchell
wrote:

> The French have a saying: "A man does not look behind a door where he
> would not hide himself"

So that's what your people are doing now? Sitting on
their asses checking stuff kids in middle school would
come up with doing? And this will find the cure for
cancer... Great.
--
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And
have a good laugh when it seeps down on
your face."
- Bert

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[The Starmaker]

http://www.universityherald.com/articles/30952/20160527/nasa-asteroid-theory-update-when-bad-science-critics-bad-science.htm

Bad science is worst than bad science fiction...

[The Starmaker]

David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
>
> If you believe that a large number of people would take
> vast amounts of money, much of it raised by charities, and fritter it
> away whilst pretending to work, thus denying it to others who might,
> perhaps, actually do the work, then you belive that large numbers of
> people are immoral assholes.

Most scientists will assure you that there is always an ethical way to test an important hypothesis.
But ask them in private and they’ll confess that the dark, unethical side has its appeal.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/8702999/Unethical-scientific-experiments-going-to-extremes.html


Yes, the majority are immoral.


wat planet are you from?


Ever heard of NASA? all immoral judging by their news releases on planet nine and all the other junk they put out.


They are cold, heartless and immoral...all of them.



Why does Albert Einstein design bombs that kill people???? FUCKIN IMMORAL!


And Obama has to go over to Japan and say, "Sorry, it's those fuckin scientist and albert einstein were out of control."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/27/the-world-was-forever-changed-here-obamas-words-at-the-hiroshima-peace-memorial-in-japan/

[David Mitchell]

On 27/05/16 13:46, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2016 05:31:58 +0100, David Mitchell
> wrote:
>
>> The French have a saying: "A man does not look behind a door where he
>> would not hide himself"
>
> So that's what your people are doing now? Sitting on
> their asses checking stuff kids in middle school would
> come up with doing? And this will find the cure for
> cancer... Great.
>

My people?

White midddle-class computer programmers?

[David Mitchell]

Well, you're still an asshole, so no.

> So which do you work for?, Nasa, or the "medical" industry ?

Neither.

>
> People are still dying of cancer everyday,....no one has a better prognosis
> than they did years ago, and far more people are being diagnosed with
> cancer, than ever before.

Well yes. That's a good thing. Are you actually reading what you write
'cos I may have to recalibrate my stupid-o-meter.

> It just costs more to keep them alive, for a bit longer. But they still die,

Well yes, everybody does. The goal of cancer research isn't to make
people immortal.

The goal is to understand the causes of cancer and devise treatments to
either "cure" it or allow more quality time once it's diagnosed.

In fact, cancer survival rates have doubled in the last 40 years, and
now 50% of people survive for more than 10 years (in England and Wales).

> and the reaserch money machine, keeps pumping out more money
> So your strawman arguments have no fact, to back them up at all.

Wow. Is this how you "reason" in real life?

You state, yourself, that "far more people are being diagnosed with
cancer, than ever before", which is unquestionably a good thing, and one
of the key factors in cancer treatment.

Cancer survival rates have doubled in the last forty years. Doubled.

So your argument that cancer research is just a money making scam, and
has no real effect must be looking a little foolish now, even to you.

By the way, I think that you should look up what a straw man argument is.

Here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

[Hägar]

"Bast" wrote in message news:ni6k0i$hlv$1...@dont-email.me...

*** Sort of like those Global Warming clowns ... if they couldn't convince
assholes like Nigger Obama and twat Pelosi that humans are responsible
for a basic warming - cooling cycle of Nature, they'd be out of a job, too.

[Bast]

When you have to resort to wikipedia for credibility,.....YOU LOSE.

[Bast]

I sure hate it when I have to agree with you.
Especially as the global warming cultists all claim that with enough money,
the problem will be solved.
.....Words worthy of any hellfire and brimstone preaching TV evangelist.

[The Starmaker]

If anyone has to resort to wikipedia they are worthless.


You're better off pointing to a kook website...at least the kook has a
name and emaill address and a basement.

[The Starmaker]

Like the doctor says "Why is this patient still here, his insurance paid
up, now he's cured."

[David Mitchell]

When you have to ignore all the salient points of an argument (because
it show that you are wrong), and focus on the use of Wikipedia to
provide an absolutely correct definition of a minor term, YOU LOSE.

This is too easy. You are beginning to bore me.

[Bast]

You did not provide any "salient points"
Only opinions with no credible citations,....other than Wikopedia.
That's what happens when you "bore" too easily. A.D.D. is a terrible thing
to bring to a discussion table.

The fact is you can not disprove any of my arguments, so resorted to 3rd
grade name calling, and insults.
....You lost before I even made the first reply.

....Now go play with your NASA moon rocks, and leave the adults to discuss
"big people things" in peace.

[Hägar]

"The Starmaker" wrote in message news:5749FB...@ix.netcom.com...

*** Seems you have that phony "Global Warming" boogeyman mixed
up with that other Liberal piece of "If you like your blah,blah,blah"
verbal diarrhea, aka Obamacare ...

[David Mitchell]

So, apparently you already believe that "far more people are being
diagnosed with cancer than ever before", and you've not even tried to
disprove that "Cancer survival rates have doubled in the last forty years".

My work here is done.

> That's what happens when you "bore" too easily. A.D.D. is a terrible thing
> to bring to a discussion table.

No, it's just that you *are* boring.

[The Starmaker]

and

"Cancer survival rates have doubled in the last forty years".

because they are fradulent diagnois to funnel money into doctors
pockets. Once the doctors pockets gets filled, they (the baby bommers),
are cured of cancer.


Come on, this is an easy scam for doctors to perform.

[Bast]

But I got your attention, didn't I.
So AGAIN,...you can't keep your story straight.

Now fr round two, would you like to try for,...

A: That Apollo was a hoax, and no men ever went to the moon,..and returned
alive.
B: The 9/11 was an inside job

[William December Starr]

In article <tYydndhbIJURttTK...@giganews.com>,

=?iso-8859-1?B?SORnYXI=?= <hs...@yahoo.com> said:

> "Bast" wrote in message news:ni6k0i$hlv$1...@dont-email.me...
>

>> Nasa has no reason to provide answers.
>> They get paid for research,....as long as they say "we are still looking for
>> the answers", they get paid.
>> If they suddenly gave us all the answers they would be out of work.
>>
>> Same reason that money going to cancer research will never provide a cure
>> for cancer.
>> Nobody wants to put themselves out of a nice lucrative cushy job.
>
> *** Sort of like those Global Warming clowns ... if they couldn't convince
> assholes like Nigger Obama and twat Pelosi that humans are responsible
> for a basic warming - cooling cycle of Nature, they'd be out of a job, too.

Man, which newsgroup (sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, or
alt.astronomy) is it that's infested with these shit-based lifeforms
that call themselves things like hsahm, bast, and ClutterFreak?

-- wds