> Very nice and cool post, Keith.,
Thank you very much Mr.Hanson, i really do appreciate that.
I thought it was pretty cool myself, to be honest, and have been
surprised by the general lack of enthusiasm with which it has been
received by sci.physics.relativity readers.
Not quite all the feedback has been negative though, HGW, who i guess
you know, did say my conclusions where correct, and we have progressed
on to a civilized discussion of the merits of 'photons' versus 'e-m waves'
> Kudos!
Thank you again Mr.Hanson
(when praise is in such short supply one does tent to milk it eh!)
> All of your conclusions, except [ > 1.] are in vogue today.
I am rather confused by what you say here, Mr.Hanson.
If folk are not going for "1. The speed of light... is slowing down",
and yet are rejecting the Big Bang, then what are they attributing the
Hubble red-shifts to?
> Also consider that there are very many ways to skin the cat.
> IOW, it's story telling about nature...
I suppose so, but it's surely an improvement on "The Universe Rests on
the Back of a Turtle" eh!
> It's all just theorizing.
You are right, but what else is theoretical physics meant to be doing,
Mr.Hanson.
As you say, Mr.Hanson. Physics has a long and proud history eh!
> BUT then, unfortunately,
> in 1905 Einstein entered and his "Juden physics" got into
> the Lime-light with its immense Zionist propaganda machine......
> ... which was the beginning of the end of the golden age of
> physics, which is the science of quantitatively MEASURING
> items, events & processes, & it began to decay & to deteriorate
> into the current free-for-all socio-physic-philosophy-palaver
> that we see to day on social media, TV shows, and here
As you say, Mr.Hanson, (but i wouldn't dare to say myself :) )
> on Usenet by cranks and crackpots, who proudly state
> that they do physics-without-math, & insist that that their
> own Weltbild is the absolute truth which they try to cram
> and stuff down everybody else's throat. When "dissidents"
> laugh at the posted excrements of these Usenet cranks, the
> cranks get vicious and criminally homicidal. The cranks
> threaten to shit into the mouths of the dissidents and want
> them to be murdered so that the cranks can urinate onto
> their graves.
Yes indeed Mr.Hanson, the level of discussion on the net can be a little
coarse eh!
not all your links seem to be working for me Mr.Hanson, but that's just
as well, or it would take forever to get finished here eh!
> "There's so many different worlds -- So many different suns
> And we have just one world -- But we live in different ones..."
Yes indeed Mr.Hanson, and no pain feels half as bad as our own eh!
> Warnings about this sorry trend of real physics came early
> on, out of the ivy-league of academia:
>>
> by John Beckman, an astronomy prof & Einstein disciple:
> "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of reality?
> That is more a matter of faith than of proof."
>>
> or by Edward Teller, the inventor of the H-Bomb, who said:
> "Einstein didn't know what he was talking about,
> or that Einstein was lying, or both".
>>
> or Prof. Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
> who wrote: "It is my firm belief that the 20th century will be
> characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
>>
> or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
> Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, all
> associated with the names of Marx, Freud and Einstein"
If i were to pick a hero from history it would be Giordano Bruno,
who said "In the future all men will believe as I believe", and do you
know Mr.Hanson, i rather think that about light slowing down too. I hope
they don't burn me, like they did my hero G.B. eh!
Thank you for all your links Mr.Hanson, and i will study them in due
course, but must get on eh!
> ...of course you can make the case/conjecture that an uncharged
> mini-black-hole of 1 Planck-mass having the radius of 1 Planck-length,
> is manifest/has half-life of only one 1 Planck-time-unit after which
> it disintegrates into exactly 1 mole of particles that consist of stable,
> charged particles with the average mass of the electron. .. in which
>>
> their fundamental electrical charge, will endow them with
> "immortality", of a duration that vastly exceeds the life-time
> span of our universe.
> What "charge" is, or where it comes from, is unknown.
> All we know is what the said charge does....
I can see you have given quite some thought to this Mr.Hanson, which
makes your kind reception of my little piece all the more gratifying.
>>
>>
> _____________ Up shot: ________________
>
> "The only thing that new changes is Change itself"
>
>>
> IOW no matter how "logical", rigorous one "calculates
> solutions, they are always limited to comparatives
> relative to each other, at best, but mostly just only
> consist of belletristic philosophical palcer.
>>
> The Dirty little secret, that nobody likes to admit to,
> is that no, none, not a single "absolute" is known to
> exist. What is advertised as "absolute/s" is/are
> edicts that are arbitrated and issued by human
> cabals or committee and declared to be "absolutes"
> so that searches and workers can comparatively
> well communicate rationally with each other.
Socrates put it like this:
"I KNOW THAT I KNOW NOTHING,
and in this i know more than any other man"
Whereas i put it like this:
"I KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW ANY BETTER THAN YOU,
and in this i know more than Socrates eh""
> Cranks OTOH take refuge and invoke their "god"
> of faith as the "real" manifest "absolute", instead of
> just humbly admitting to saying: "I don't know"
>>
> Interestingly, faith, which is an emotional notion,
> is a million times stronger than any obviously rational
> logic. The force of Faith and religious beliefs are so
> deep that societies and potentates have elected
> to protect and enshrine Faith in societies' laws
> and its constitutions, even in today's modern society.
>>
>>
> hmmm...<snicker>...<chortle>...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFLMAO
I really don't know Mr.Hanson,
what does ROTFLMAO mean ?
keith stein
P.S. Remember this?
The Big Bang Myth ... Keith Stein - Mountain Man's News Archive
www.mountainman.com.au/news97_9.html
Date: 22 Feb 1997 06:57:03 +0000. From: Keith Stein Organization: My
Organisation Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag.
Subject: THE BIG BANG MYTH ...