Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Taimandred being proven true undermines all WoT fandom

145 views
Skip to first unread message

Rudolph Shicklgraner

unread,
Nov 14, 2015, 3:45:12 AM11/14/15
to
Nothing RJ, Harriet, BS, the VHs/Tor, or any other associates can be taken
seriously now.

The series has been destroyed and unraveled. If only we had had proper
curators of this legacy in the vein of Christopher Tolkien, but alas,
Harriet would not provide Rigney with heirs.

Nicolas George

unread,
Nov 14, 2015, 6:58:06 AM11/14/15
to
Rudolph Shicklgraner , dans le message
<XnsA5527A75...@94.75.214.90>, a écrit :
You could try enjoying books for what is in them, once in a while, instead
of reveling in insulting people who have different interpretations than you.

Rast

unread,
Dec 2, 2015, 11:25:47 PM12/2/15
to
You should have posted a link.

http://www.theoryland.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=8767

Wow, huge news.



--
There walked into the lethal quicksands a very old man in tattered
purple, crowned with withered vine-leaves and gazing ahead as if upon the
golden domes of a fair city where dreams are understood. That night
something of youth and beauty died in the elder world. - H P Lovecraft

Chucky@Work

unread,
Dec 9, 2015, 10:41:07 PM12/9/15
to
What this basically proves is that the people who thought "Taim is Demandred in disguise" was a dumb plot point that made no narrative sense were right about it even before the author was.

The giant fanboy dummy-spit is just icing on the cake.


C@w
--
I can live with that.

Nicolas George

unread,
Dec 10, 2015, 3:03:35 AM12/10/15
to
"Chucky@Work" , dans le message
> The giant fanboy dummy-spit is just icing on the cake.

The words you are looking for are:

"I was wrong and I apologize to all the people I insulted."

But hey, there is no point in expecting the impossible from people.

Chucky@Work

unread,
Dec 10, 2015, 7:02:38 AM12/10/15
to
torstai 10. joulukuuta 2015 10.03.35 UTC+2 Nicolas George kirjoitti:

> > The giant fanboy dummy-spit is just icing on the cake.
>
> The words you are looking for are:
>
> "I was wrong and I apologize to all the people I insulted."

Oh boy, it's old Nicholas George! Look at that.

> But hey, there is no point in expecting the impossible from people.

What was I wrong about?

Oh well, I did apologise as soon as I found out about this, so I will copy the same here:

https://stchucky.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/interlude-asmodean-demandred-taim-and-robert-jordan-lied1one/

C@w
--
You're still a whiner, though. I'm *sympathetic* about that, but not *apologetic*.

Nicolas George

unread,
Dec 10, 2015, 12:53:02 PM12/10/15
to
"Chucky@Work" , dans le message
<b8f11fd5-9971-461c...@googlegroups.com>, a écrit :
> What was I wrong about?

When someone is so thoroughly humiliated as you just were, the best reaction
is usually to keep a low profile. But I can see how someone with your
cognitive powers would not grasp that and prefer stick their head deep in
the sand. Keep up the good work of polluting the fandom.

Chucky@Work

unread,
Dec 10, 2015, 10:09:18 PM12/10/15
to
torstai 10. joulukuuta 2015 19.53.02 UTC+2 Nicolas George kirjoitti:

> When someone is so thoroughly humiliated as you just were, the best reaction
> is usually to keep a low profile. But I can see how someone with your
> cognitive powers would not grasp that and prefer stick their head deep in
> the sand. Keep up the good work of polluting the fandom.

I will!


C@w
--
What I mainly like about being right is everything.

Rast

unread,
Dec 19, 2015, 1:19:56 PM12/19/15
to
Chucky@Work wrote on Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:02:36 -0800 (PST):
>
> torstai 10. joulukuuta 2015 10.03.35 UTC+2 Nicolas George kirjoitti:
>
> > > The giant fanboy dummy-spit is just icing on the cake.
> >
> > The words you are looking for are:
> >
> > "I was wrong and I apologize to all the people I insulted."
>
> Oh boy, it's old Nicholas George! Look at that.
>
> > But hey, there is no point in expecting the impossible from people.
>
> What was I wrong about?
>
> Oh well, I did apologise as soon as I found out about this, so I will copy the same here:
>
> https://stchucky.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/interlude-asmodean-demandred-taim-and-robert-jordan-lied1one/

Wow Chucky, you suck at apologising.

As for the idea that the anti-Taimandred faction was right even before RJ
was... note that right around when RJ changed his mind on Taimandred is
when the series went to shit.

What a pity that Jordan didn't wrap things up in ten books, maximum. The
overall quality would have been far better, and he would have still had
time to write a couple of the "outrigger" novels he'd been planning.

Chucky@Work

unread,
Dec 20, 2015, 9:56:45 PM12/20/15
to
lauantai 19. joulukuuta 2015 20.19.56 UTC+2 Rast kirjoitti:

> > https://stchucky.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/interlude-asmodean-demandred-taim-and-robert-jordan-lied1one/
>
> Wow Chucky, you suck at apologising.

It helps that a lot of the people demanding apologies are obnoxious. But I genuinely am sorry that I stood up for Jordan's alleged behaviour in this case (although it's starting to look more and more dubious that there was actually any evidence, or that it meant anything if there was). He shouldn't have said that Demandred was never Taim if this had been part of his overall story plan at any point. Especially since he apparently enjoyed playing Aes Sedai so much in his book signings and avoided telling outright lies.

It wasn't necessary to my case that I defend these alleged statements of his, so it really was a separate argument.

> As for the idea that the anti-Taimandred faction was right even before RJ
> was... note that right around when RJ changed his mind on Taimandred is
> when the series went to shit.

*laugh*

Okay chief.

> What a pity that Jordan didn't wrap things up in ten books, maximum. The
> overall quality would have been far better, and he would have still had
> time to write a couple of the "outrigger" novels he'd been planning.

It's posts like this that make it really easy to believe that this whole line of "new evidence" was just made up by somebody so they could still somehow be right about Taimandred. It also makes me want to withdraw my statements and my apology, which don't apply to what you seem to want them to apply to anyway.

But you know, I won't.



C@w
--
Quit while you're ... well, not *ahead*, so much as ... well. Whatever gets you through the day there, bud.
0 new messages