OT: Geometry 101
Jaime M. de Castellvi
Johansson's right cheek, what shape would you end up with? A square?
A rectangle? A trapezoid? And what would all the angles add up to?
Cheers,
Jaime
Paul Vader
>OK, so if you were to use straight lines to join the moles on Scarlett
>Johansson's right cheek, what shape would you end up with? A square?
Who? *
--
* PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
like corkscrews.
Jaime M. de Castellvi
wrote:
>3c...@comcast.net (Jaime M. de Castellvi) writes:
>>OK, so if you were to use straight lines to join the moles on Scarlett
>>Johansson's right cheek, what shape would you end up with? A square?
>
>Who? *
Youngish new Mollywood flavour, NYer, Claire Danes kind of look,
artsci movies, looks like. Had a good year. You can catch her (main
*cutesy* roles) in _Lost in the Translation_, _Girl with a Pearl
Earring_ and _The Perfect Score_ almost all at once with a little
movietheatre hopping.
Cheers,
Jaime
Paul Vader
>Youngish new Mollywood flavour, NYer, Claire Danes kind of look,
>artsci movies, looks like. Had a good year. You can catch her (main
>*cutesy* roles) in _Lost in the Translation_
Oh, she's Charlotte I assume? I didn't notice the moles, so I guess I can't
answer. She did have a strange aversion to wearing pants in that movie. *
Jaime M. de Castellvi
wrote:
>3c...@comcast.net (Jaime M. de Castellvi) writes:
>>Youngish new Mollywood flavour, NYer, Claire Danes kind of look,
>>artsci movies, looks like. Had a good year. You can catch her (main
>>*cutesy* roles) in _Lost in the Translation_
>
>Oh, she's Charlotte I assume? I didn't notice the moles, so I guess I can't
>answer. She did have a strange aversion to wearing pants in that movie. *
She did have that in common with Captain Infinity there, although it
may have been for slightly different reasons. She is shapely enough
in that department that I didn't mind though. Mind you, I'm not
saying that I would have minded with Captain Infinity either. Nor am
I saying that he is not plenty shapely. I'm not really saying what
you are thinking I'm saying. I'll say no more on this.
As for the moles, I noticed them vaguely in _Translation_ but did not
choose to amuse myself by counting them until _Pearl Earring_. There
seem to be exactly four of them but, try as I might to play "join the
dots" throughout the movie, I couldn't for the life of me figure out
whether I was dealing with a rectangle or a trapezoid.
Days later, this is still eating at me.
Cheers,
Jaime
Captain Infinity
Jaime M. de Castellvi wrote:
>>She did have a strange aversion to wearing pants in that movie. *
>
>She did have that in common with Captain Infinity there, although it
>may have been for slightly different reasons. She is shapely enough
>in that department that I didn't mind though. Mind you, I'm not
>saying that I would have minded with Captain Infinity either. Nor am
>I saying that he is not plenty shapely. I'm not really saying what
>you are thinking I'm saying. I'll say no more on this.
Methinks you've already said *way* too much.
**
Captain Infinity
...it's 10:00 ...do you know where your pants are?
A.E. Jabbour
> 3c...@comcast.net (Jaime M. de Castellvi) writes:
>>OK, so if you were to use straight lines to join the moles on Scarlett
>>Johansson's right cheek, what shape would you end up with? A square?
>
> Who? *
Good lord, go rent GHOST WORLD! Granted, Johansson is not the main character,
Thora Birch is. But it is a wonderful, thoughtful, evocative film.
I have yet to see either LOST IN TRANSLATION or GIRL WITH A PEARL
EARRING but I will definitely see them soon, as they are both showing
at a theatre near me.
--
AE Jabbour
"We have an early winner for Least Likely to Be Named Feel-Good Movie of the Year."
Carlo Cavagna, re: "Irreversible"