Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Review: SMART (2016)

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark R. Leeper

unread,
Dec 4, 2016, 9:22:48 PM12/4/16
to
SMART
(a film review by Mark R. Leeper)

CAPSULE: Specialized Mobile Animal Rescue Team of Los
Angeles is one of only two exclusively animal rescue units
in the world and the only one in the United States.
Founded and led by Armando Navarrete who heads--and often
informally funds--a team of volunteers who at great
inconvenience to themselves rescue animals. Their unit is
called on to rescue a range of animals from kittens in a
tree to a horse in quicksand. Justin Zimmerman directs.
The documentary style is not exciting, but the cause is a
good one. Rating: low +2 (-4 to +4) or 7/10

Back when I worked in Detroit we were talking at a business meeting
about a tie-up on the highway getting to the meeting. One person
said that it was caused by the police stopping traffic to rescue a
dog that had been hit by a car and who was lying on the road. I
shuddered to imagine what a nightmare the dog had been going
through. My office-mate said he would not want to see his tax
money spent on saving a dog. I said nothing, but I could never
look at him the same way again. I guess I just could not imagine
someone I knew had so little compassion for a hurt dog.

This documentary is entitled SMART and is about SMART. That is a
slightly contrived acronym for the Los Angeles "Specialized Mobile
Animal Rescue Team." This is an emergency team, on call 24x7,
overseen by the Los Angeles Animal Services division. This team
was founded in 2009 and in that time has saved almost 1000 animal
lives frequently at physical risk to themselves. They brave falls,
equipment failure, and the rage of animals who do not understand
their purpose. The story of the unit and their principles are told
on camera by group founder Armando Navarrete and his wife and co-
team-member Annette Ramirez. They married after initial
philosophical differences. Asked if given the choice of saving
Annette or an animal, Navarrete would try to save the animal.
(After all, Annette is human and would be more able to take care of
herself. An animal is not so lucky. Annette was not buying it.
But most of the troubles that animals face can be traced to human
causes.)

The team has often had to train themselves to get them ready at
their own personal risk in the many kinds of different terrain in
the Los Angeles area. Often they have invented their own tools
when they do not exist or are too expensive. Team members say
they do not make any money, often spend their own money for the
equipment they need. Yet Navarrete can claim a 100 percent success
rate in animal rescues.

Zimmerman directs under a small handicap. While most of the
rescues are probably recorded by somebody's cell phone, they do not
often enough create captivating images. Climbing a tree and
reaching out for a stranded cat does not create much visual
excitement. Your local neighborhood theater is unlikely to ever
have a film with Brad Pitt rescuing a dog from a well. The SMART
team undergoes danger and excitement, but it is not that kind of
excitement that sells theater tickets. Some of the rescue scenes
may warm the hearts of some members of the audience, but this is
not the most exciting documentary around.

The film is composed of original footage, archive footage, and
filmed interviews. I rate SMART a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or
7/10.

SMART was released to DVD and VIDEO ON DEMAND on December 6.

Film Credits:
<http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4781586/combined>

What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smart>


Mark R. Leeper
Copyright 2016 Mark R. Leeper

0 new messages