If so, I'd like to see it.
- Gary
Surf around in here. All the still shots are free; you just have to
pay for video clips, which I've never done.
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/
Daily updates, too, and lots of nicer bums than BB. You can spend a
lot of time in here.
Enjoy.
>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:23:26 -0700, Gary <ga...@spamblocker.com> wrote:
>
>> I was watching "Contempt" and it has a couple of side shots
>>of Bardot lying naked on her stomach and the thought
>>occurred to me: has there ever been a better bum in movies
>>than Bardot's?
>>
>> If so, I'd like to see it.
Ach, mon! You can do much better this this:
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/movie.php/27443
Okay, granted, that's not a particularly flattering
picture. It came across much better in the movie, I
thought.
Or perhaps I was influenced by the total Bardot package -
that hair, that pout, mmmmmmm.........
- Gary
Thanks for the link, Mack. That *is* an interesting site.
- Gary
Her legs weren't bad either. Remember this famous shot from _ Love Is
My Profession_.
I recall the shot. It's a facial foremost, largely a sixth
accountable to a sum reaction. Art studies provide a geometric
equation for adhoc portraitures, well-known in the broadcasting
industry as facial placement ratios, similar to disciplines in science
for determining the most common denominator within a fashion
attractiveness qualifies. Facial being an overriding constant,
whereas body proportions are within leeways of range;- today's
fashioniocentric walkway equation of slimness at an extreme of
obsessive anorexia, in absolutist terms, wasn't an fleshy opulence of
yesterday's famines nor mean production of foodstuffs.
Bardot isn't such a case. She's compact and foreign, someone perhaps
ahead on a skew suspect as bantam petite if to meet in person,
bordering overall within a mesomorphic bone structure, for her pelvis
both skin lends to the tonal musculature of three gluteal groups
comprising her derriere.
At one point I was with someone similar, even a demiknown to some
circles, her butt with such striking facial features in time became a
unified force of reckoning, even mounted atop thunderous piano-leg
thighs of creamiest alabaster. Personally, I'd credit films only so
far into a roughage as guides to reality.
Seen her lately? Not a pretty sight. She has not aged gracefully.
Right you are, too. She actually looks dreadful!
Too much of the high-life and way too much sun.
http://www.silvergeneslivingwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/helen_mirren_bikini.jpg
> At one point I was with someone similar, even a demiknown to
> some circles, her butt with such striking facial features in
> time became a unified force of reckoning
Right...
Good choice!
Helen is a babe!
Without meaning in a face, under it big or small won't matter;
contempt, jealously, being distracted by others are complicit
repercussions.