In message <news:jkfi16$jog$
1...@dont-email.me>
Michael Graf <
deg...@freenet.de> spoke these staves:
>
> Am 21.03.2012 11:42, schrieb Raven:
>>
>> "Eruvatar" <Eruv...@Arda.com> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:4f69021f$0$2076$c3e8da3$9f40...@news.astraweb.com...
>>>
>>> As Saruman was of the Maia and had obviously seen the power of
>>> Eru and the Valar, why did he not fear their reactions to his
>>> base treachery of his mission to aid others to resist Sauron.
That would require that he did see his own actions as a 'base
treachery' against the mission he was given, and I am not entirely
convinced that he saw it that way. In many ways I think Saruman fell
into the same trap as did Sauron -- starting out wanting /good/ to
happen to Middle-earth, they became fixed on their own personal
interpretation of 'good', and wanted to implement that particular
vision of 'the greatest good for the greatest number of people'
regardless of whether others would disagree. In that desire lies the
seeds for their lust for domination (forcing their vision upon all
others) and the power to force through their vision. Saruman would
have argued that he had, as the only one, actually stayed true to the
mission, and was working to ensure universal peace and prosperity in
Middle-earth (and who gives a bother about freedom, anyway?)
>>> I can understand him wanting to keep Sauron from getting back
>>> the ring of power but not to use it to replace him. Just seems
>>> that he would have been afraid of the consequences of his
>>> actions.
>>
>> Most likely because he knew that the Valar had given up meddling
>> directly in the affairs of Middle-earth. His own order, Heren
>> Istarion, were the Valar's last ditch effort against Sauron, and
>> he must have known that. Just as Sauron believed, as directly
>> stated by Tolkien, that Eru and the Valar had quite given up
>> Middle-earth
Yes, this is the other aspect of it. Saruman would, better than any
other, have known that he was 'on his own' and thus left to his own
devices in Middle-earth. Yes, the Wizards were directed not to
dominate the inhabitants of Middle-earth in any way (fear, awe,
worship or whatever), but the Valar weren't there, were they? The
Valar just didn't know the situation in Middle-earth, did they? And
they had no intention of interfering ever again, anyway, had they?
And surely they'd understand that Saruman had no other options, if
only they could see what the situation in Middle-earth was /really/
like, wouldn't they?
> Mmmh, could you cite a source? I can remember the Valar giving up
> guardianship over Arda (not only ME, downfall of Numenor),
In actual fact, that was a very temporary thing, and only lasted
while Eru punished the Númenóreans. The Valar had, however, become
very careful about interfering in Middle-earth (after failing
miserably a couple of times) and in particular with the Eruhíni. The
Wizards were their only strategy in the Third Age, and it is likely
that Saruman had been told that there would be no help (or, as he
might later have viewed it, 'interference') from Valinor under any
circumstances.
Theres is a text in 'Myths Transformed' (part 5 of /Morgoth's Ring/ -
/HoMe 10/) that contains several passages that pertain to this
discussion, Text VII 'Notes on motives in The Silmarillion' (where
many of the motives discussed are actually referring to /The Lord of
the Rings/ since the Istari do not exist as such in the formal
/Quenta Silmarillion/).
In section (i)
it had been [Sauron's] virtue (and therefore also the cause
of his fall, and of his relapse) that he loved order and
co-ordination, and disliked all confusion and wasteful
friction.(It was the apparent will and power of Melkor to
effect his designs quickly and masterfully that had first
attracted Sauron to him.) Sauron had, in fact, been very
like Saruman, and so still understood him quickly and could
guess what he would be likely to think and do, even without
the aid of /palantiri/ or of spies
[...]
But like all minds of this cast, Sauron's love (originally)
or (later) mere understanding of other individual
intelligences was correspondingly weaker; and though the
only real good in, or rational motive for, all this
ordering and planning and organization was the good of all
inhabitants of Arda (even admitting Sauron's right to be
their supreme lord), his 'plans', the idea coming from his
own isolated mind, became the sole object of his will, and
an end, the End, in itself. [*]
[...]
Sauron could not, of course, be a 'sincere' atheist. Though
one of the minor spirits created before the world, he knew
Eru, according to his measure. He probably deluded himself
with the notion that the Valar (including Melkor) having
failed, Eru had simply abandoned Eä, or at any rate Arda,
and would not concern himself with it any more. It would
appear that he interpreted the 'change of the world' at the
Downfall of Númenor, when Aman was removed from the
physical world, in this sense: Valar (and Elves) were
removed from effective control, and Men under God's curse
and wrath.
[...]
[Sauron's] cynicism, which (sincerely) regarded the motives
of Manwë as precisely the same as his own, seemed fully
justified in Saruman. Gandalf he did not understand. But
certainly he had already become evil, and therefore stupid,
enough to imagine that his different behaviour was due
simply to weaker intelligence and lack of firm masterful
purpose.
[*] [Footnote to the text] But his capability of corrupting
other minds, and even engaging their service, was a residue
from the fact that his original desire for 'order' had
really envisaged the good estate specially physical well-
being) of his 'subjects'
and in section (iii):
The Valar 'fade' and become more impotent, precisely in
proportion as the shape and constitution of things becomes
more defined and settled. The longer the Past, the more
nearly defined the Future, and the less room for important
change (untrammelled action, on a physical plane, that is
not destructive in purpose). The Past, once 'achieved', has
become part of the 'Music in being'. Only Eru may or can
alter the 'Music'. The last major effort, of this demiurgic
kind, made by the Valar was the lifting up of the range of
the Pelori to a great height. It is possible to view this
as, if not an actually bad action, at least as a mistaken
one. Ulmo disapproved of it.
Christopher Tolkien judges all the texts of this section to belong to
the years about 1960 when Tolkien was attempting to create a
consistent Silmarillion after the publication of /The Lord of the
Rings/ -- that of course means that it is written perhaps twenty
years after the first parts of /The Lord of the Rings/ and some of it
may be post-rationalisations -- attempts to answer some of the
questions that are not answered in /LotR/ simply because no answers
had existed a mere half decade earlier when /LotR/ was published.
This of course needs to be taken into account -- when I answer I base
it on what Tolkien said years later, and he may have thought
something completely different (or, IMO more likely, not have
considered these questions) when he wrote and edited /LotR/.
> and indeed I always had the feeling that Men had been the unloved
> "foster-children" of the Lords of the West.
That's a bit harsh, I think :)
There are, I think, at least two things going on. First of all, the
Valar definitely suffered from having burned their fingers on the
interfering with the Elves -- not just once bitten, but several times
bitten and now seriously shy. At the same time there is the very
real issue of the Valar's power fading as described in the quotation
above.
> But Eru/Illuvatar? He brought Gandalf back to live to fulfill his
> quest (in a way, at least) and extended his "magical power", and
> so directly interfered in favour of Sauron's opponents.
That, however was the first real sign in more than three thousand
years (or, perhaps more correctly, the first thing that could be
explained in no other way), and at that point it was not only too
late for Saruman and Sauron to turn around, but they probably didn't
know hoots about it anyway. I very much doubt that Saruman had any
idea that anything special had happened to Gandalf until he was
called back and his staff broken after the destruction of Isengard.
> I somehow thought that Men turned more directly to Illuvatar than
> to his "stewards", the Valar.
You may be thinking of Númenórean traditions at the Meneltarma (not
sure if 'worship' would be a correct description, but the place was
hallowed to Ilúvatar and they did have some kind of ceremony of
thanksgiving there.
[...]
>> and that he could therefore do what he liked with it, so
>> presumably Saruman believed that the Powers of the West and
>> Ilúvatar wouldn't meddle anymore. Loser.
Considering your points above (the stated similarities between
Saruman and Sauron as well as Tolkien's explicit descriptions of
Sauron's beliefs), I think it is very likely that Saruman came to the
same conclusions despite having more recent (albeit only by a
thousand years or so) information.
--
Troels Forchhammer <troelsfo(a)
googlewave.com>
Valid e-mail is <troelsfo(a)
gmail.com>
Please put [AFT], [RABT] or 'Tolkien' in subject.
And he that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left
the path of wisdom.
- Gandalf, /The Fellowship of the Ring/ (J.R.R. Tolkien)