--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Reading Hackspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reading-hackspace+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Blimey.
That is a heck of a lot of machining capability for a reasonable price that we could in theory buy outright.
Were we to seriously consider it, additional costs would be factored in including an ongoing maintenance plan for it which could be a lot. Software cost, availability and training could be a gotcha.
Our current non CNC lathe allows people to get into the heart of lathe operation without the complexity of programming machining strategies on a computer.
I wonder, how many rLab members and other local people have a need to use this level of machine, and how often?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Reading Hackspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reading-hacksp...@googlegroups.com.
Agree on both counts. I would be daunted by the time investment in learning it even if the software were cheap, which it won’t be.
It’s like any high cost machine, once out of its warranty/depreciation/support window, it plummets in value, as you’re in a whole different market – users with lower budgets, lower frequency of need, who will either take a chance and run it into the ground, or pay for extended support, but this comes out of the cost of buying the machine. It’s not in the company’s interest to lower the cost of software and support, or they end up competing for new machine sales against a growing pool of their own old products...
Would love a DRO for our current lathe, this could be immediately useful, and adds no real complexity for a new user.
Eventually it could be good to add a simple, limited CNC upgrade to it – AFTER we are done with and confident using the Shapeoko, and ideally using similar control toolchain.
From: 'Toby Williams' via Reading Hackspace [mailto:reading-...@googlegroups.com]
Sent: 15 August 2017 12:41
To: Reading Hackspace
Subject: Re: [RDG-Hack] Re: Just waving a thing
In reality, I believe the barrier to entry is too high for this machine to be practically useful. A DRO on the current lathe would be a great upgrade for much less cost and complexity.
Funny though. Seems like sooooo much of the cost of CNC machines these days is the controller and software, not the iron.
T
--
IS this kind of spot welder usable for joining cells together to make battery packs?
Cheers
Alex
From: reading-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:reading-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mikethebee
Sent: 20 August 2017 10:55
To: Reading Hackspace
Subject: Re: [RDG-Hack] Re: Just waving a thing
That's a shame, but gives an idea of what to ook out for. - Mike
On Friday, 18 August 2017 21:15:13 UTC+1, Andy Noyes wrote:
Re. the spot welder. Apparently it's no longer available, the seller had it advertised elsewhere.
--
This is my experience too. Our work toolroom would nearly always use a non CNC lathe for the types of jobs we do at rLab.
A CNC lathe would be way down my list of useful tools to take money and space. It is higher on the interesting tool list, but in reality, more of a project. Maybe when the Shapeoko and Boxford mill are done, we might look at a project like this. I am interested how the CAM part of Fusion 360 can handle lathes and rotary laser cutters.
The ability to make coordinated XY moves is the big value to the CNC mill, but the need for coordinated multi axis moves is much less on the lathe. The whole tool holding, tool change is much more difficult on the lathe too due to tool shapes and more degrees of freedom in tool mounts. Guess this why many CNC lathes have very different geometric configurations to manual lathes.
From: reading-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:reading-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mikethebee
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 11:01 AM
To: Reading Hackspace <reading-...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RDG-Hack] Re: Just waving a thing
From my experience, the real value of a CNC on a lathe is for repeat operations. Connecting to CAD/CAM systems allows transfer of designs from the tech. drawing team to the ops, but only justified on a batch, or where the lathe can do multiple operations such as drilling. CNC on a mill is more akin to a 3DP and thus the automation is valuable even for a oneoff.
--
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reading-hackspace+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.