re-linq .net 4 build

77 views
Skip to first unread message

Alexander I. Zaytsev

unread,
Oct 16, 2012, 11:22:37 AM10/16/12
to re-moti...@googlegroups.com
Hi, all

Have you any plans on build re-linq for .net 4/4.5 ?

Fabian Schmied

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 2:18:26 AM10/17/12
to re-moti...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

> Have you any plans on build re-linq for .net 4/4.5 ?

While we're not explicitly building for .NET 4 at the moment, the
standard .NET 3.5 binaries should work just fine on .NET 4 - some
people are using it on that platform.
Have you run into any problems?

Regards,
Fabian

Alexander I. Zaytsev

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 2:38:54 AM10/17/12
to re-moti...@googlegroups.com
No, I have no problems running it on .NET 4

I'm thinking only in context that .NET has own ExpressionVisitor and other expression extensible features as Accept method on Expression and so on.

2012/10/17 Fabian Schmied <fabian....@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "re-motion Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to re-moti...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to re-motion-use...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/re-motion-users?hl=en.


Fabian Schmied

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 2:58:07 AM10/17/12
to re-moti...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

> No, I have no problems running it on .NET 4
>
> I'm thinking only in context that .NET has own ExpressionVisitor and other
> expression extensible features as Accept method on Expression and so on.

Yes, but that wouldn't just be a build for .NET 4, it would be a
completely new version with .NET 4 (only?) features.
We're not currently planning for that, but it will probably come
sooner or later. Maybe we'll just change our own ExpressionTreeVisitor
class so that it has the same API as the .NET 4 ExpressionVisitor
(plus the Visit methods for expressions specific to re-linq, such as
SubQueryExpression, etc.) and then make a separate .NET 4 build that
no longer duplicates the features already present in .NET 4. But as I
said, we're not planning for that yet.

What regards the expression extensibility features, re-linq has its
own ExtensionExpression class that also offers Accept, VisitChildren,
and Reduce methods, similar to what the .NET 4 Expression class offers
in terms of extensibility.

Best regards,
Fabian
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages