Hello Jean-Baka,
a short answer would be: you should try :)
If it's a single-gene alignment, branch length/model optimization (-f e) should be pretty fast.
As long as you specify "-m GTRGAMMA", no automatic model switching will occur.
As for your other concern, numerical underflow problems might really happen with the dataset of this size - it depends
on your alignment/topology. We do have a solution for this, but unfortunately it's not (yet) integrated in the
production version of RAxML. So should standard RAxML fail, you can try the following branch which contains the fix:
https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-sativa
We would also like to hear about the outcome, to have an idea how often the problem surfaces in practice. It will allow
us to set reasonable defaults in the future versions of RAxML, since preventing numerical underflow incurs some overhead.
Best,
Alexey
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "raxml" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.