Hi Rob,
Just started checking. In fact, it is not as simple as I thought.
The problem seems to be the combination of -U (memory saving) and +I.
Can you maybe run your analyses without -U and tell me if the error
still occurs. It went away when I removed -U. In the meantime, I'll
investigate a bit further.
Alexis
On 30.09.2015 07:59, Rob Lanfear wrote:
> Hi Alexis,
>
> Yes - on my machine I can only get the error with +I. I never get it for
> models without +I ('never' is probably in the region of a few million
> analyses, since I'm running partitionfinder on large datasets, and
> partitionfinder is calling RAxML a lot).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> On 30 September 2015 at 00:38, Alexandros Stamatakis
> <
alexandros...@gmail.com
> <mailto:
alexandros...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy with other stuff.
>
> Can you confirm that the error only appears with +I?
>
> I am 99% sure that I know where it comes from if it only happens
> when +I is being used.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alexis
>
>
>
> On 07.09.2015 12 <tel:07.09.2015%2012>:41, Rob Lanfear wrote:
>
> No worries. I understand that this is unlikely to make it to the
> top of
> any to-do lists!
>
> In some further analyses, I am pretty sure that this issue is
> limited to
> GTR+I+G models, and doesn't occur with GTR+G models. I have only
> seen it
> with the former.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> On 7 September 2015 at 18:50, Alexandros Stamatakis
> <
alexandros...@gmail.com
> <mailto:
alexandros...@gmail.com>
> <mailto:
alexandros...@gmail.com
> <mailto:
raxml%252Buns...@googlegroups.com>>>.
> <mailto:
raxml%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
raxml%252Buns...@googlegroups.com>>.