Hi Karen,
> recently in some workgroups we discussed whether it is reasonable
> a) to use the best tree found in ML treesearches
That.s probably too biased, so I would never just use one tree as
starting tree.
> b) parsimony starttrees (default) or
> c) completely random trees
I think for BS it doesn't matter that much as you already have a
randomization component via the bootstrap re-sampling itself.
If a single BS replicate however always yields the same parsimony tree
(which can happen for datasets with strong signal), I'd then rather go
for random starting trees.
> as start trees when bootstrapping.
> In additional question to b) in case of parsimony trees (this is the
> default, correct?)
Not really the default as starting trees are generated in a
pre-processing step, thus there is no real default.
> should the parsimony trees drawn from each BS replicate
> or from the original dataset / and or is there any recommendation? What
> is the common setting you (the developers) would use?
the parsimony tree should be computed on the BS replicate.
Alexis
>
> Thanks, & best, Karen
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "raxml" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Alexandros (Alexis) Stamatakis
Research Group Leader, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
Full Professor, Dept. of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
www.exelixis-lab.org