Raven 3 equivalent for two undocumented methods?

[Stacey]

I am really sorry to ask, as I had intended to put this in my last post, but I simply slipped my mind. I am using the (old) outdated "Raven.contrib" library with some simple, but somewhat useful extension methods - but with Raven 3.0, there are two that are broken because I believe methods they call are either renamed, or taken out entirely.

Is there an equivalent to IDocumentStore.AsyncDatabaseCommands.GetBuildNumberAsync() and Abstractions.Data.IndexQuery.SkipTransformResults?

I know that a lot of things involving Transforms was changed dramatically, recently. And in all truth, I don't really use the two methods that these are attached to, but seeing as how I don't fully grasp what they do (well, the build number one is obvious), I'm interested in seeing if I simply need to update the methods they are looking for, or if I need to explore fixing up the extension methods I do use to work more appropriately with Raven 3.0.

[Oren Eini (Ayende Rahien)]

TransformResults were removed completely.

You can get the build number by using /build/version

Hibernating Rhinos Ltd  

Oren Eini l CEO l Mobile: + 972-52-548-6969

Office: +972-4-622-7811 l Fax: +972-153-4-622-7811

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RavenDB - 2nd generation document database" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ravendb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Stacey]

Thanks, that actually answers a lot. I had a feeling that the transform results were gone. This actually makes those extension methods a bit simpler, now. I have to tip my hat to you guys, I've just never seen such a non-friction deployment of a new major version of ... anything. It's truly remarkable how much care has gone into Raven 3.0 - all of the versions, for that matter.

[Stacey]

To add to that, I simply cannot believe the elegance of the new HTML5 studio. I honestly didn't believe you could improve upon the 2.5 version, and I am pleasantly surprised and excited that I was so, so, so wrong. I literally didn't have to change a single thing in my entire program, and it ran right out of the box, every single unit test passed on the first try, as well. There really needs to be some kind of award for a "perfect upgrade experience".

On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 3:47:58 PM UTC-5, Oren Eini wrote: