screencast showing how to deploy Railo on Heroku

[Mike Henke]

If anyone is interested, here is a short screencast showing how to deploy Railo on Heroku. http://www.henke.ws/post.cfm/coldfusion-and-heroku-railo-screencast

[Mark Drew]

Awesome work fella! 

Regards

Mark Drew

The Railo Company
Professional Open Source
skype: mark_railo ma...@getrailo.com
+44 7971 852296 http://www.getrailo.com

On 7 Mar 2013, at 14:57, Mike Henke <henk...@gmail.com> wrote:

If anyone is interested, here is a short screencast showing how to deploy Railo on Heroku. http://www.henke.ws/post.cfm/coldfusion-and-heroku-railo-screencast

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Railo" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to railo+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Billy Cravens]

Good screencast, thanks for doing this. Might have been nice to elaborate on what a dyno is, as I think that's one of the more confusing aspects of Heroku. Also, couldn't hurt to mention downsides of free tier (Heroku shuts down inactive free dynos, so there'll be startup time when the first viewer shows up when the dyno is revived). 

Also you said "ColdFusion", which some folks get fussy about. :-) 

Billy Cravens
bdcr...@gmail.com

On Mar 7, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Mike Henke <henk...@gmail.com> wrote:

If anyone is interested, here is a short screencast showing how to deploy Railo on Heroku. http://www.henke.ws/post.cfm/coldfusion-and-heroku-railo-screencast

[Igal]

good job!  we need more stuff like this.  well done :)

Igal

[Chris Blackwell]

Hi Mike,

Nice work, and good screen cast.

I have to admit to being a maven neophyte, so i may have misunderstood the pom file, but it looks like you are excluding the railo.deps group and then including each artifact explicitly, where as i thought it was mavens job to just sort this stuff out?

Cheers, Chris

--

[Mike Henke]

Makes sense what you are saying. Denny might know why it was done this way.

Did removing the explicit includes & exclude work? If it does go head and send a pull request.