That'll make sure it gets addressed.
BTW, this is also why the dev branch is bleeding edge and not suitable
for production - so bugs like this can be found early and fixed.
Assuming we do find a bug, and don't see anything in the group nor any jira ticket on it, does Railo prefer that we bring it up on the group first, or just submit a ticket?
-- Michael Offner-Streit CTO Railo Technologies GmbH michael...@railo.ch www.getrailo.com Mailing List (english): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/ Mailing List (german): http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/ Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/71368/0CF7D323BBC1 Issue Tracker: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RAILO Blog: http://www.railo-technologies.com/blog
Seems like the results should be the same on each test.
I'm glad I'm not the only grey-haired guy around, what little's left is
grey anyway. Guess you could call me punch card old. Problems not
withstanding, I just love increased level of abstraction (and not having
to worry about dropping that stack of cards).
Andrew Penhorwood
On Jan 22, 3:46 am, Michael Offner-Streit <michael.off...@railo.ch>
wrote:
> > *Railo 3.1.2.007 Error
> > (Java.lang.stackoverflowerror)* *Message* java.lang.StackOverflowError *Stacktrace* The
> > Error Occurred in
> > *D:\$DevWebRoot\contextForward\index.cfm: line 1
> > 1: <cfset getPageContext().forward("/landing.cfm")>
>
> > Java Stacktrace*
> > /--
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Penhorwood
> > and...@coldbits.com <mailto:and...@coldbits.com>
> >www.coldbits.com<http://www.coldbits.com>
> > 740-392-7141 office
> > 740-507-4634 cell/
>
> > -- Michael Offner-Streit CTO Railo Technologies
> > GmbHmichael.off...@railo.ch
> > <mailto:michael.off...@railo.ch>www.getrailo.com
> > <http://www.getrailo.com> Mailing List
> > (english):http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/Mailing List
> > (german):http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/Linked
> > in:http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/71368/0CF7D323BBC1Issue
> > Tracker:http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RAILO
> > Blog:http://www.railo-technologies.com/blog
>
> > /--
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Penhorwood
> > and...@coldbits.com <mailto:and...@coldbits.com>
> >www.coldbits.com<http://www.coldbits.com>
> > 740-392-7141 office
> > 740-507-4634 cell/
>
> --
> Michael Offner-Streit
> CTO
> Railo Technologies GmbH
> michael.off...@railo.chwww.getrailo.com
Ah, now that was real computing! I had several projects early on in my
career where you wrote code out on special graph-like paper and sent
it down to the data entry folks to type in... and we did backups on
punched tape (not very reliable). And multi-user machines had just 4MB
RAM :)
> Problems not withstanding, I
> just love increased level of abstraction (and not having to worry about
> dropping that stack of cards).
True, the abstraction has been a boon - and OO and Functional
Programming styles have moved us a long way forward from procedural
style in terms of expressiveness and maintainability.
When I was at Macromedia, I was one of the oldest guys on the team.
That changed once Adobe bought Macromedia, of course...
I think I'm the oldest guy at Railo... I like being the old curmudgeon! :)