Andrew:
> Rafał Wojdyła:
>> [And again, this time with inline signature...]
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that today we are opening the full source of Qubes
>> Windows Tools!
>>
>> Detailed instructions for building are in the qubes-builder-windows
>> repo, which also includes an example builder config to use.
>>
>> Following repositories are needed to build the installer:
>>
>> * vmm-xen-windows-pvdrivers
>> * core-vchan-xen
>> * windows-utils
>> * core-qubesdb
>> * core-agent-windows
>> * gui-common
>> * gui-agent-windows
>> * installer-qubes-os-windows-tools
>>
>> And here you can find the official blog post:
>>
https://www.qubes-os.org/news/2016/01/27/windows-tools-open-source/
>>
>>
>
> Awesome! Great news.
>
> To my understanding, and as was alluded to in the post, this signals a
> shift in business strategy. That is, that instead of having some sort
> of paid "premium" Qubes distribution, the Qubes team now has a different
> model for supporting itself.
The idea was not a "premium" distribution, just that businesses would be
more interested in supporting integrated Windows functionality. That
value proposition still exists I hope, incorporating the Windows Tools
(rather than treating it as a proprietary addon) is a way to enable
users to have the same trust in it as in the rest of Qubes.
There are obviously other communities besides businesses that also find
the Windows Tools valuable (really anyone trying to transition their
workflows from Windows into Qubes), so this should make using the
Windows Tools an easier decision and enable better adoption of Qubes
more generally.
> Is this actually untrue? In either case, this brings up the question:
> exactly how will ITL fund Qubes development?
> What is the long-term plan? Is there a long-term plan?
Ideally through a diverse mix of funding, both in terms of entities
providing funding and timelines of the funding.
The long-term plan is to continue to try to find ways of funding Qubes
development.
> On a related note, I know ITL has received a few recent grants. How
> does the Qubes team envision such grants playing a part in the future
> funding of the project? Are there guidelines for whose and what kind of
> support to accept? For example, should ITL seek grant funding from
> various arms of the US government?
We are always looking for more support for Qubes development. Grants (as
a style of funding) don't need to come from the US government, they can
also come from public or private foundations, non-US governments,
non-governmental organizations, etc.
Joanna discussed guidelines in the context of the OTF grant we received
last year:
http://blog.invisiblethings.org/2015/06/04/otf-funding-announcement.html
As Joanna mentioned in the blogpost, if you (or others reading) have
relevant knowledge, experience, leads, free time etc and would like to
help out in these efforts let us know.
Michael
--
Michael Carbone
Qubes OS |
https://www.qubes-os.org
@QubesOS <
https://www.twitter.com/QubesOS>
GPG fingerprint: 2DBE 2014 E7B0 0730 303D 7AAB 99AB 0624 6EEB F5A8