that's probably *exactly* my point, I mean, probably...
shen is so advanced that it could probably take us to the moon and back,
and yet.., and y...e...t...
in my amateurish uninformed opinion, I think we need something like "euler's 1000 problems in shen", why?
it's, of course, obvious to see "why", let's face it... maybe I had a tiny-little to do with the birth of the shen PROFESSIONAL,
ok, maybe a lot, even... when it comes to dr. tarver, you'd have to be a hopeless fool to believe that we're dealing with
an *ordinary" genius, and I do emphasize the word "genius", but be that as it were, even among "lisp" languages, we're
definitely *NOT* dealing with *ordinary* lisp... are you with me so far? good, because if you ARE, then you will quickly
REALIZE that everything I say here deeply and irresistably resonates with you, but I digress (perhaps too much), but my
point, pointless as it were, is that, sure, it's great that there are close to (or over, by now) 500+ subscribers to shen PROFESSIONAL
by now, congrats, etc... but... but!
it's a smart move, in my opinion, to offer a watered-down version (until all you taste is WATER, which is alright, water is good too),
of shen PROFEASSIONAL, but still, I firmly believe, you need to entice and encourage the newcomers, perhaps to the complete
idea, or dare we say, the shenanigans, of functional programming, let alone lisp-family langauge that you've always known about and loved,
because it's easy enough to say, aww, well, five years or ten years down the line, who knows, and who cares... but perhaps those who eat,
might...
shen might be where clojure is technically-speaking (maybe, maybe no, you be the judge), but it's not nowhere near where clojure is
if richie hickey was able to raise enough funds to sustain himself and the langauge of his love while he was working on XYZ features of
clojure, which may not be where shen can claim to be up to par with... so I don't know where I'm going with this thoiught, but you shenturians
are purportedly the smart ones, so I'm sure not only will you figure it out to a T, but tell me and correct me as to where I was right on or off...
thank you.