Now - I have lots of spare pc's - but - think the standalone might be slightly more useful. However - the PC one seems to have more functions - including a signal generator etc. so I'm torn.
Any Thoughts would be appreciated.
sigpoggy
unread,
Mar 19, 2013, 12:55:00 AM3/19/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to portable-so...@googlegroups.com
I can't speak to the digital scope but I have used both the PC scope and an analog 50 mhz scope on this project (audio freqs). The only advantage I found to the analog scope was a finer and wider amplitude adjustment, much easier and more flexible triggering, and over all easier tweaking things with physical knobs and buttons. The waveform analysis on the pc scope was useful. I was not thrilled with the pc scope UI, but eventually I figured out how to do most things I wanted albeit often it was slow and clumsy. The pc scope takes up less space and is cheaper.
Gareth Jones
unread,
Mar 27, 2013, 9:41:06 AM3/27/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to portable-so...@googlegroups.com
Ok - anybody got any other opinions?
I'm leaning towards the digital scope - Apparently they used to be upgradeable to 100 mhz scopes - but that has been made a little more difficult.