Hi Enrique,
If you search for "quadcopter vibration damping" you will see some
innovative approaches for reducing vibration. For the Phantom 3
you should be able to find a way to attach a Mobius to the
anti-vibration plate that holds the camera. That plate has four
vibration dampeners - one in each corner.
Your NDVI results will be different from Landsat results for a few
reasons. One is that you will see individual plant parts and
Landsat will see 30m x 30m squares. Depending on how high you fly
it is conceivable that a single photo would cover the same area as
one or a few Landsat pixels. Due to that huge difference in
spatial resolution you will see a lot of variation in your photos
compared to Landsat. Landsat NDVI is also calibrated so different
image (over space and time) can be compared. The Mobius images can
be calibrated but I don't think that is possible using the online
Infragram processing capabilities. You could try the FIJI plugin
although that is experimental:
https://publiclab.org/notes/nedhorning/01-13-2016/packaged-photo-monitoring-plugins-available-on-the-github-repositoy
Ensuring that your NDVI values are normalized to Landsat NDVI is
not a trivial task but depending on what you are doing that might
not be necessary. The Mobius NDVI is reasonably good at
illustrating changes in plant health/vigor within a photo and
often between photos of a single flight. Comparing photo acquired
on different days requires a little more work but it's not
difficult as long as the atmospheric (clouds and particulates) and
sun conditions (time of day and time of year) are similar.
One word of caution is that there is a fairly long lag time
(typically several days to well over a week) between when a plant
is stressed and when that stress is evident using NDVI as an
indicator of stress.
All the best,
Ned