--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Play framework dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framework-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Play framework dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framework-dev+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framework-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Sorry, I accidently ommited a word. I meaned TLS client (browser) certificates support
05.12.2014 3:32 пользователь "James Roper" <jro...@gmail.com> написал:On Friday, 5 December 2014 11:48:22 UTC+11, Anton Kulaga wrote:what about TLS support, is it in plans?Play has supported TLS since Play 2.1 was released, almost 2 years ago.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/play-framework/Rdza9rFbAqQ/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
Sorry, I accidently ommited a word. I meaned TLS client (browser) certificates support
05.12.2014 3:32 пользователь "James Roper" <jro...@gmail.com> написал:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 11:48:22 UTC+11, Anton Kulaga wrote:what about TLS support, is it in plans?Play has supported TLS since Play 2.1 was released, almost 2 years ago.
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 6:44:20 AM UTC+2, James Roper wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/play-framework/Rdza9rFbAqQ/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
James, quick question: I know that Play 3 is also in the works. How far apart will they be released?Sorry if I missed any communication on this earlierThanks-greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
Hi,I wanted to try out the 2.4-M2, but I didnt find any download link for that version.How do I begin trying out the 2.4-M2 version ?T
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
Hello,
Will we have a M3 release any time soon? I mean, there are a lot of changes since M2 and I think we can help to test the current state of 2.4.0 development.
Cheers
Hey Rich,Is 2.4.0-M3 imminent? Also, any very rough guestimate on when 2.4.0 might drop?Cheers,Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Play framework dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framework-...@googlegroups.com.
Hi,
The Play team are proud to announce the release of Play 2.4.0-M2.
Some feedback.1) 2.4.0-M2 is proven to be a solid piece of engineering. We had some minor glitches (DI + Guice stacktraces, requires 4.X or no_aop classifier)2) It's really fast3) Nota ll documentation is updated for 2.4.X. This seems to be progressing, and not something common sense can't handleThe biggest issue is testing : The current implementation is unusable, and for a number of reasons :1) No application stack is running by default. Makes testing code that relies on very difficult2) Doesn't play well with DI : We had to resort to all kinds of hacks3) Bad feedback : Numbers don't add up, and we can't reliable tell if test have run / succeeded4) Tests are sometimes 'ignored'. Still haven't found out the exact trigger5) Doesn't play well with AkkaIt only works well if you either have pure functions to test, or if it's behind a controller, and this had made proper unit tests next to impossible.I can provide more details if needed.Regards,Igmar