On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Michael Cullum <
m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It was noted by a few individuals that the way the bylaws stand about
> fulfilling the initial 12 Core Committee roles as if there is a 12-member
> vacancy this leads to a rather inefficient situation where some people would
> have their terms expire in April/May of this year which I'm sure you all
> agree is non-ideal as (1) they won't have time to settle in (2) CC elections
> take time and focus away from working on specifications and two in such a
> short period is relatively unhelpful.
>
> However, a small change could help resolve this issue so I'm just asking if
> anyone objects to us doing it slightly differently**
>
> The old system would have involved the following three terms:
> Top four candidates term expires in: August 2018
> Next four candidates term expires in: January 2018
> Last four candidates terms expire in: April 2017
>
> My suggestion is to change it so they receive the following (slightly
> extended terms so the minimum term is ~1 year and maximum is just over 2
> years):
> Top four candidates term expires in: April 2019
> Next four candidates term expires in: August 2018
> Last four candidates terms expire in: January 2018
>
> Essentially, we just skip the first normal CC election and extend everyone's
> term by a few months so that we stay on the defined calendar for future
> elections.