Discrepancies between Google's page speed report and 3rd parties

50 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Fleming

unread,
Sep 15, 2016, 2:16:29 AM9/15/16
to pagespeed-insights-discuss
Hello all:

I recently began testing my page speed on my site @ www.rlfleming.com. I started using GTmetrics, and Pingdom, and after I changed my CDN I began testing with Google's Page speed in addition to the 3rd party testing, and I have received different speed ratings from all three services, and I am wondering which is the most accurate results ?

With Google, I received an 89/100, with Pingdom 91/100 , and with GTmetrics 97/100. On both 3rd party sites, I test using Dallas and firefox to ensure I am getting relatively as close as possible to the most realistic testing parameters.

So is Google the only results I should be concerned with and why are the other two sites so far apart on testing results?

This is the link to the Pingdom report https://tools.pingdom.com/#!/ckCsu6/http://www.rlfleming.com  and I am attaching the GTmetrics report

Thank you in advance for your help.


Rob
GTmetrix-report-www.rlfleming.com-20160902T172535-Z1RNvjIk-full.pdf

Rick Steinwand

unread,
Sep 15, 2016, 1:15:36 PM9/15/16
to pagespeed-insights-discuss
GT Metrix isn't always up to date with PSI and ySlow. I'm not familiar with Pingdom.

Don't sweat the numbers, just fix what's within your ability.

Rob Fleming

unread,
Sep 16, 2016, 7:48:48 PM9/16/16
to pagespeed-ins...@googlegroups.com
Ok so Is slow important because while I have high numbers in psi and the others, my yslow rating is extremely low, like a 79

   --Rob Fleming
My website: Rlfleming.com
     I Write because when I am writing I am never wrong and who wants to be wrong when they know by writing they can never be wrong... well as long you have spell check…I think! :P



On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Rick Steinwand <colc...@702com.net> wrote:

GT Metrix isn't always up to date with PSI and ySlow. I'm not familiar with Pingdom.

Don't sweat the numbers, just fix what's within your ability.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "pagespeed-insights-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pagespeed-insights-discuss/YiMeSSNid4s/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to pagespeed-insights-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pagespeed-insights-discuss/4a3eb76b-ac20-495d-88c1-482703523dcb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

signature.asc

Rick Steinwand

unread,
Sep 19, 2016, 1:16:41 PM9/19/16
to pagespeed-insights-discuss
One is a recommendation by Google, the other by Yahoo.

Both are similar, just a different scoring method.

I'd try for the highest you can get on both, depending on your time and abilities. Always go for the low hanging fruit (easiest for you) first tho. Every little bit helps.

ddur

unread,
Sep 24, 2016, 1:35:10 PM9/24/16
to pagespeed-insights-discuss
Only relevant metrics is time to load page. And user experience how fast page looks like loaded.
Take everything else as check/to-do list that will help you to achieve fast page load times.
ie optimizing images, minimizing styles and scripts for few Kb savings on page of Mb sizes is useless.

ddur

unread,
Sep 24, 2016, 2:01:19 PM9/24/16
to pagespeed-insights-discuss

Your page is served with Apache.
You should try NGinx + HTTPS + HTTP/2
;)


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages