Cannot add base class 'Xyz', because of recursion - due to OEntityManagerClassHandler getName()

[arjun dhar]

Motive

Am using JPA/Object database and modeling entities such that they work with Hibernate (JPA2) as well as OrientDB.
On OrientDb - 3.0.0

Domain Model

The domain model is very simple:

com.neurosys.crm.pricing.domain.jpa.Feature -- <<extends>> --> com.neurosys.crm.pricing.domain.Feature

Error

On Registering  class : com.neurosys.crm.pricing.domain.jpa.Feature

I Get:

```

com.orientechnologies.orient.core.exception.OSchemaException: Cannot add base class 'Feature', because of recursion

DB name="stumps_crm_odb"

at com.orientechnologies.orient.core.metadata.schema.OClassImpl.checkRecursion(OClassImpl.java:1572)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.core.metadata.schema.OClassImpl.addBaseClass(OClassImpl.java:1516)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.core.metadata.schema.OClassEmbedded.setSuperClassesInternal(OClassEmbedded.java:425)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.core.metadata.schema.OClassEmbedded.setSuperClasses(OClassEmbedded.java:273)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.object.enhancement.OObjectEntitySerializer.registerClass(OObjectEntitySerializer.java:660)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.object.entity.OObjectEntityClassHandler.registerEntityClass(OObjectEntityClassHandler.java:51)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.object.entity.OObjectEntityClassHandler.registerEntityClass(OObjectEntityClassHandler.java:40)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.object.entity.OObjectEntityClassHandler.registerEntityClass(OObjectEntityClassHandler.java:34)

at com.orientechnologies.orient.core.entity.OEntityManager.registerEntityClasses(OEntityManager.java:232)

at com.neurosys.odb.object.RegisterClass.register(RegisterClass.java:45)

at com.neurosys.odb.object.etl.ODBPersistTransformer.setRegisterClasses(ODBPersistTransformer.java:101)

at com.neurosys.crm.domain.EntitiesTest.testPackageAndFeatures(EntitiesTest.java:70)

        ...

```

Cause / Effect / Suggestion

OEntityManagerClassHandler relies on Class.getSimpleName() ; not sure why it dares to make that assumption. However even so, can you suggest an elegant way to override this?