Why the Left Needs Racism - I

[Rudy Canoza]

A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
with race.


Why the Left Needs Racism
It serves a political purpose.
By James Taranto
Updated April 19, 2010 12:01 a.m. ET

What do you get when you cross a corny old joke with a network news
report? Something like this:

A black guy walks into a tea party, and a white lady says to him, "You
know, we don't get many African-Americans in here." The black guy
replies, "And at these prices, it's no wonder!"

The joke, at least as we originally heard it, involves a kangaroo and a
bartender. The news report, brought to our attention by the fellows at
NewsBusters.org, involved NBC reporter Kelly O'Donnell and tea-party
activist Darryl Postell. O'Donnell approached Postell at a Washington
rally, and hilarity ensued:

O'Donnell: There aren't a lot of African-American men at these
events.

Postell: [laughs] Right.

O'Donnell: Have you ever felt uncomfortable?

Postell: No, no, these are my people, Americans.

Another joke, attributed to our friend Rich Miniter circa 1991, goes as
follows: What do you call a black man at a conservative event? Guest
speaker. To the New York Times's Charles Blow, this is no laughing
matter. Blow visited a tea party in Dallas last week and didn't like
what he saw:

I had specifically come to this rally because it was supposed to be
especially diverse. And, on the stage at least, it was. The
speakers included a black doctor who bashed Democrats for crying
racism, a Hispanic immigrant who said that she had never received a
single government entitlement and a Vietnamese immigrant who said
that the Tea Party leader was God. It felt like a bizarre spoof of
a 1980s Benetton ad.

The juxtaposition was striking: an abundance of diversity on the
stage and a dearth of it in the crowd, with the exception of a few
minorities like the young black man who carried a sign that read
"Quit calling me a racist."

Blow was especially put off by Alphonzo Rachel, a black comic who spoofs
the president by performing skits as "Zo-bama." Blow sums up the
experience this way: "Thursday night I saw a political minstrel show
devised for the entertainment of those on the rim of obliviousness and
for those engaged in the subterfuge of intolerance. I was not amused."

Blogger Conor Friedsdorf notes that there is a
heads-I-win-tails-you-lose quality to the Blow approach:

In any context except a Tea Party, the vast majority of liberal
writers would praise the act of highlighting the voices of "people
of color" even if they aren't particularly representative of a
crowd or corporation or university class. Let it happen at a rally
of conservatives, however, and this winds up on the nation's
premier op-ed page. . . .

It's this kind of piece that causes people on the right to think
that on matters of race, they're damned if they do, and they're
damned if they don't--if they don't make efforts to include
non-whites they're unenlightened propagators of privilege, and if
they do make those efforts they're the cynical managers of a
minstrel show, but either way, race is used as a cudgel to
discredit them in a way that would never be applied to a political
movement on the left.

Or, for that matter, to any nonpolitical institution that aspires to
become more inclusive. Imagine Kelly O'Donnell questioning a black man
in a largely white company or university or country club or suburb the
way she interrogated Darryl Postell. She would come off as clueless and
prejudiced--as, come to think of it, she does. (Kudos to NBC for airing
this revealing though embarrassing footage.)

The political left claims to love racial diversity, but it bitterly
opposes such diversity on the political right. This is an obvious matter
of political self-interest: Since 1964, blacks have voted overwhelmingly
Democratic. If Republicans were able to attract black votes, the result
would be catastrophic for the Democratic Party. Even in 2008, the
Democrats' best presidential year since '64, if the black vote had been
evenly split between the parties (and holding the nonblack vote
constant), Barack Obama would have gotten about 48% of the vote and John
McCain would be president.

the rest at
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704671904575193921155425154

[Malcolm McMahon]

Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>with race.
>

If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on what's wrong
with American Society.

Heard an interview a week or so ago with a black female professional. She'd
just moved from the states to Europe. What she said was very revealing. She
said that the lack of "micro-aggressions" in Europe came a kind of culture
shock. White women did not check the security of their handbags when she walked
past.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 04/06/2016 11:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>> with race.
>>
>
> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on what's wrong
> with American Society.

But they lie to themselves and everyone and rewrite history and so they
don't really know what's wrong with America....

They have no real starting point from which to evaluate what's wrong and
thereby have no real point to start from when making policy to fix what
they wrongly determined to be wrong.

>
> Heard an interview a week or so ago with a black female professional. She'd
> just moved from the states to Europe. What she said was very revealing. She
> said that the lack of "micro-aggressions" in Europe came a kind of culture
> shock. White women did not check the security of their handbags when she walked
> past.
>

They will now that there are thousands of new Muslims.... the problem
wasn't the white women being security minded it was that it takes time
for the influx of outsiders to adapt to a nations morals and values and
so the new arrivals are the greater danger rather than the locals who
have been there and grown up in that environment.

Maybe the women will have to check their bags when anyone walks by, if
the new arrivals change the morals and values of the entire nation.

--
That's Karma

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/6/2016 8:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>> with race.
>>
>
> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on what's wrong
> with American Society.

Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
make race relations worse.

[Rudy Canoza]

"Progressivism" is not progress.

[duke]

Amen to that. Progressive belong to the 'rat party.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[Ted Street]

<koo...@maricaibo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>> make race relations worse.
>

> By "Obsession" do you mean point out the obvious, PROVEN examples of
> racism in State/local governments in many "red states", the PROVEN
> racism related to voter suppression, (long list, Trudy Can-o-Boozer)
>
>> Come on. Everybody knows ALL whites (except those of the left) are
>> racist. This is why all blacks need special privileges to make up for
>> all those years of white racism Ken Burns always tells up about.
>
> Not past racism---(a historical fact)---but ongoing, proven,
> disgusting, and open racism being practiced by conservative state
> government and the present Republican congress.

Where?

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:34:45 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>

>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>> make race relations worse.
>

>By "Obsession" do you mean

He means your anal and fecal preoccupation.

>Not past racism---(a historical fact)---but ongoing, proven,
>disgusting, and open racism being practiced by

The Democrat Party- The party of racism.

[Al Czervik]

On 4/6/2016 4:56 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:34:45 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>
>>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>>> make race relations worse.
>>
>> By "Obsession" do you mean
>
> He means your anal and fecal preoccupation.

Gary popped his boyfriend colostomy bag and it was the most exciting
night of his life.

[Spread Eagle®]

On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 8:14:19 AM UTC-7, Malcolm McMahon wrote:

> Heard an interview a week or so ago with a black female professional. She'd
> just moved from the states to Europe. What she said was very revealing. She
> said that the lack of "micro-aggressions" in Europe came a kind of culture
> shock. White women did not check the security of their handbags when she walked
> past.

In other words she found herself what's known as a target rich environment.

[Verdine White]

"Al Czervik" wrote in message news:ne4dfo$6s2$1...@dont-email.me...

#####
Gary must have thought it was "lube."

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:46:44 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:56:19 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@null.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:34:45 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>>>> make race relations worse.
>>>

>>>By "Obsession" do you mean dumb racist fucks like yourself?
>
>Yes, ShitterPants, that's what I said

I think everyone in the newsgroup is in agreement on that, Gary!

>>He means anal and fecal preoccupation you have?
>
>Yes, shitter-in-Pantzen, that's my main occupation.

And you don't see anything wrong about boasting about it?

Weird.

>>>Not past racism---(a historical fact)---but ongoing, proven,

>>>disgusting, and open racism being practiced by people I love to associate with?
>>
>>The Democrat Party that got whipped
>> in the Civil war---that made the Democrats the The party of racism.
>
>Yep, that's the one, SHITS-in-PANTIES

Yep. Nathan Bedford Forrest would be *so* proud of you, Gary!

[chuckle]

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:48:02 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:38:08 -0700, Al Czervik
><Caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Gary popped his boyfriend colostomy bag and it was the most exciting
>>night of his life.
>

>Another wet-dream of mine?

Or was it YOUR colostomy bag, Gary?

Or do you guys have a little on-line club where you bag-wearers seek
each other out?

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/6/2016 2:34 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>

>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>> make race relations worse.
>

> By "Obsession" do you mean point out

By "obsession", Roselles, you cunt, I "mean point out" [sic] that the
left never stop yammering stupidly about race. You leftists think race
is important, when it isn't. That makes you the racists.

[Rudy Canoza]

In his empty fucking skull.

[Topaz]

The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[spudd]

On 4/6/2016 9:48 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> Another self-related wet-dream of your Al Baby?


"You called for the death of a sitting US president and the
teenage daughter of a poster you disagreed with...

Oh yeah, you threatened to blow up Mt. Rushmore, too -- said you could
make it look like a mining accident. Especially damning since you
once labored (quite menially, IMA) as a "miner" -- chuckle.

The FBI loved that one.

For your sake, you better hope nothing ever happens to K. Harris, B.
Robertson's teenage daughter or Mt. Rushmore or the next sound you'll
hear is that of a Federal battering ram busting down the door of your
HUD-subsidized government apartment there in Rapid City...

<SNICKER>"

"Gary Roselles" (Yoorghis: 4215 Cedar Ridge Pl, Apt 42, Rapid City, SD
57702) Gets Buster-BUSTED For Lying!!!!!!!!!!!! HAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!

[spudd]

On 4/6/2016 9:46 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> Yes, ShitterPants, that's what I said

[spudd]

[spudd]

On 4/6/2016 3:34 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> Not past racism---

[Ted&Alice Street]

Rudy Canoza wrote:

> On 4/6/2016 3:50 PM, Ted Street wrote:
> ><koo...@maricaibo.com> wrote:
> >>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:53:04 -0400, benj <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 04/06/2016 11:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > >

> > > > > Regressive "progressives" constitute MOST of what is wrong

> > > > > with American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is

> > > > > the worst thing that is wrong with American society.

> > > > > Regressive "progressives" make race relations worse.
> > >
> > > By "Obsession" do you mean point out the obvious, PROVEN examples
> > > of racism in State/local governments in many "red states", the
> > > PROVEN racism related to voter suppression, (long list, Trudy
> > > Can-o-Boozer)
> > >
> > > > Come on. Everybody knows ALL whites (except those of the left)
> > > > are racist. This is why all blacks need special privileges to
> > > > make up for all those years of white racism Ken Burns always
> > > > tells up about.
> > >
> > > Not past racism---(a historical fact)---but ongoing, proven,
> > > disgusting, and open racism being practiced by conservative state
> > > government and the present Republican congress.
> >
> > Where?
>
> In his empty fucking skull.

Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer me.

[Rudy Canoza]

Gary Roselles is a drug addict. Drug addicts are never dependable.

[Ted&Alice Street]

Thanks for the info. It's hardly surprising.

[Rudy Canoza]

He's also one of the most doctrinaire and predictable assholes in these
groups. He's very prone to reciting a comma-separated list of left-wing
totems into a single "sentence" [sic] and posting it as if it were
something meaningful (note use of subjunctive tense "were.") It was
nothing but brainless chanting.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/7/2016 8:34 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

> Mostly southern states

No, racist bigot. "Southern states" fully respect the rights of everyone.

>>>>> In his empty fucking skull.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer me.
>

> Why would a time element

Bullshit.

>> Thanks for the info. It's hardly surprising.
>

> Thank YOU for the laugh of

He beat your ass, faggot bitch.

[Malcolm McMahon]

Beam Me Up Scotty

<All-Liberal-Policies...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>On 04/06/2016 11:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>>> with race.
>>>
>>
>> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
>> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on what's
>>wrong
>> with American Society.
>
>But they lie to themselves and everyone and rewrite history and so they
>don't really know what's wrong with America....
>
>They have no real starting point from which to evaluate what's wrong and
>thereby have no real point to start from when making policy to fix what
>they wrongly determined to be wrong.
>

Everyone has their own ideas about what the best course is. But the essential
difference between progressives and conservatives is, always and everywhere,
that progressives belief the future can be better than the past. Most new ideas
are wrong, of course, but the conservative doesn't even _examine_ new ideas,
for those few that really move us onwards. Conservatives find their utopia in
the past, not the future.

Conservatives don't really function on history, but on myth.

>>
>> Heard an interview a week or so ago with a black female professional. She'd
>> just moved from the states to Europe. What she said was very revealing. She
>> said that the lack of "micro-aggressions" in Europe came a kind of culture
>> shock. White women did not check the security of their handbags when she
>>walked
>> past.
>>
>
>They will now that there are thousands of new Muslims.... the problem
>wasn't the white women being security minded it was that it takes time
>for the influx of outsiders to adapt to a nations morals and values and
>so the new arrivals are the greater danger rather than the locals who
>have been there and grown up in that environment.

But this woman's family, no doubt, have been Americans for many generations.
Black Americans are rarely recent immegrants.

>
>Maybe the women will have to check their bags when anyone walks by, if
>the new arrivals change the morals and values of the entire nation.
>

Nothing is easy in these matters, but we will assimilate them.


>--
>That's Karma

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:34:30 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 01:11:52 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"

>Mostly southern states---still pissed because blacks got equality.

>
>>> > > In his empty fucking skull.
>>> >
>>> > Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer me.
>

>Why would a time element be relevant in answering you dumb fuckwits?

Because it illustrates just how little you know, Gary.

>Your stupidity and ignorance is enternal.

You want an example of stupidity and ignorance? Coming right up!

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:32:24 -0700, Sn...@smack.com wrote:
Message-ID: <4kek3b5662v7p53h5...@4ax.com>

::Joe Cooper: It also shows that opponents’ fears that concealed
::Joe Cooper: carry laws will mean carnage in the streets

>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: Are you crazy?
>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: It's already here.
>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: 30,000 dead from guns each year?

Still waiting for Gary to produce a single cite proving that 30,000
deaths a year are caused by CCW

::KLAUS: Really? 30,000 dead from concealed carry?

>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: Yes.
>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: "rulings" related to the 2nd
>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: amendment---are predicated
>Gary Roselles The Dakota Moonbat: on bogus foundation.

Still waiting for a cite to prove "rulings" have caused 30,000 deaths
per year.

[Malcolm McMahon]

You think conservatives bring progress? Wrong, by definition, conservatives
want to move backwards, though the past is _much_ worse than they remember.

[Malcolm McMahon]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
>nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
>world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
>It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
>the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
>people in India.
>
> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
>intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
>important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
>the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
>are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
>
>

Interesting stats in the UK. The ethnic group that does _worst_ at school are
caucasians.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:45:07 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
<mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:

>You think conservatives bring progress? Wrong, by definition, conservatives
>want to move backwards

It takes a leftist to come up with a definition THAT stupid.

[chuckle]

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/7/2016 11:55 PM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> Beam Me Up Scotty
> <All-Liberal-Policies...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 11:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>>>> with race.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
>>> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on what's
>>> wrong
>>> with American Society.
>>
>> But they lie to themselves and everyone and rewrite history and so they
>> don't really know what's wrong with America....
>>
>> They have no real starting point from which to evaluate what's wrong and
>> thereby have no real point to start from when making policy to fix what
>> they wrongly determined to be wrong.
>>
>
> Everyone has their own ideas about what the best course is. But the essential
> difference between progressives and conservatives is, always and everywhere,
> that progressives belief the future can be better than the past.

Bullshit. Just bullshit. Proggies believe that human nature is
something they can change, and that they and they alone have superior
vision about how to do that. Of course, most of what proggies want to
do is *NOT* progress - not in any way. In fact, it's entirely regressive.

The biggest single element of contemporary regressive "progressivism" is
identity politics, mostly about race but including ethnicity, sex,
sexual orientation, sexual identity, physical ability, and did I mention
race? Proggies are obsessed about group identity. They believe that
your membership in one of these immutable groups is what defines you
more than any individual characteristics you might have. But, *wait*!
Isn't that what feudalism was? You were born into a socioeconomic
class, and that defined you for your entire life. Proggies want to take
us to neo-feudalism.

Everything this snotty arrogant shitbag McMahon says about
"progressivism" is wrong - 100% bullshit.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/8/2016 9:45 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> On 4/6/2016 8:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 4/6/2016 8:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>>>>> with race.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
>>>> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on
>>>> what's wrong
>>>> with American Society.
>>>
>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>> make race relations worse.
>>
>> "Progressivism" is not progress.
>
> You think conservatives bring progress?

The choice is not limited to one between conservatives and regressive
proggies, idiot.

> Wrong, by definition, conservativeswant to move backwards,

That's just a fucking lie, and you're just a contemptible fucking liar.
It is simply a lie to say that conservatives want to resist all
change, and an even bigger and stupider fucking lie to say they want to
move backward. The painful truth for you, shitbag, is that
conservatives are quite often *right* that changes proggies have brought
about are bad.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

Progressives are examples of the fact that lies to others and themselves
and rewriting history means they have no real facts to base their
decisions on and that means seeking progress is full of perils since
what they think they know.... they really don't know. In which case
progress becomes a fools errand....

--
That's Karma

[Topaz]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:46:50 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
<mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:


>Interesting stats in the UK. The ethnic group that does _worst_ at school are
>caucasians.

Maybe they don't like the PC agenda of the school. It's a proven fact
that Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. That
explains why Africa is so backward.

by Paul Craig Roberts

"Anything good in Western civilization is said to have been stolen
from Black Africa including the English language. Professors claim
that Egyptians were blacks and that Aristotle stole his ideas from the
Egyptian library in Alexandria. The "distinguished scholars" who make
these claims are not sufficiently learned to know that the library was
built after the death of Aristotle. One know-nothing, Martin Bernal,
at Cornell (of course) ignores the Mycenaen, Achaean, Dorian and
Ionian wells of ancient Greek culture in order to attribute the
origins of Greek culture to Africa.

The white kids who attend Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Cornell,
Stanford, Michigan, University of California, Duke, wherever, are
enculturated into a pathology of guilt over evils allegedly
perpetrated by their forebears. They are brainwashed into accepting
unequal rights and limitations on their speech as atonements for the
sins of their fathers. Those who resist are sentenced to "sensitivity
training," accused of various harassment crimes, and expelled.

"Academics have buried Western civilization under a mountain of
lies. The great books are not burned, but they are discredited with
the charge that the great thinkers in the past were apologists for a
"white hegemonic order."

The erasing of our culture progresses rapidly. Several years ago
it came to light that students in an Illinois public school were being
taught that the ancient Egyptians were blacks who flew among the
pyramids until whites arrived and killed the blacks who could fly. The
reasons given for teaching this nonsense was to improve the
self-esteem of black children and to explain to them why they don't
live in the big houses."

[Malcolm McMahon]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:46:50 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
><mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>Interesting stats in the UK. The ethnic group that does _worst_ at school are
>>caucasians.
>
>Maybe they don't like the PC agenda of the school. It's a proven fact
>that Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. That
>explains why Africa is so backward.
>

Oh come on! We're talking kids here, not political idealogues. They don't give
a monkey's about ideology and the implications of history.

You can't seriously imagine they are not studying because they object to the
teacher's political views. It would appear they aren't studying because they
can't be arsed.

[Malcolm McMahon]

Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>On 4/8/2016 9:45 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>> On 4/6/2016 8:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2016 8:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>>>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>>>>>> with race.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
>>>>> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on
>>>>> what's wrong
>>>>> with American Society.
>>>>
>>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>>> make race relations worse.
>>>
>>> "Progressivism" is not progress.
>>
>> You think conservatives bring progress?
>
>The choice is not limited to one between conservatives and regressive
>proggies, idiot.
>

I didn't say it was. There's all kinds of idiots on both sides of the
conservative/progressive divide. But there are also people who think on both
sides.

>> Wrong, by definition, conservativeswant to move backwards,
>
>That's just a fucking lie,

What does the word "conservative" mean to you? Because the word is about
keeping things the same.

> and you're just a contemptible fucking liar.
> It is simply a lie to say that conservatives want to resist all
>change, and an even bigger and stupider fucking lie to say they want to
>move backward. The painful truth for you, shitbag, is that
>conservatives are quite often *right* that changes proggies have brought
>about are bad.

Not all change is good, it's true. You have to be ready and able to back out in
the face of unintended consequences.

But the world _is_ improving by most sensible measures. Its becoming a less
violent place. Afluence is spreading to areas where grinding poverty has been
the norm.

[Ted&Alice Street]

LOL. I'll have to start paying him more attention then. :)

[Ted&Alice Street]

koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 01:11:52 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"

> Mostly southern states---still pissed because blacks got equality.

Have you ever been to the southern states? If so, that's just a vicious
lie. If not, then you need to get a clue. Southerners are less
prejudiced than northerners nowadays. But you're in ND, right? So you
have no concept of race relations anywhere. The places I was in ND were
almost entirely white.

>
> >> > > In his empty fucking skull.
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer me.
>

> Why would a time element be relevant in answering you dumb fuckwits?

> Your stupidity and ignorance is enternal.
> >

> > Thanks for the info. It's hardly surprising.
>

> Thank YOU for the laugh of accepting a self-proven moron's posts.

Rudy is a brilliant guy.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/8/2016 2:32 PM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> On 4/8/2016 9:45 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2016 8:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 4/6/2016 8:11 AM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>> A post in which I talk *not* about race, but about the left's obsession
>>>>>>> with race.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there wasn't so much wrong with the world, there would be no need for
>>>>>> progressives. Progressives in America are quite right to focus on
>>>>>> what's wrong
>>>>>> with American Society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regressive "progressives" constitute *MOST* of what is wrong with
>>>>> American 'Society' [sic]. Their obsession with race is the *worst*
>>>>> thing that is wrong with American society. Regressive "progressives"
>>>>> make race relations worse.
>>>>
>>>> "Progressivism" is not progress.
>>>
>>> You think conservatives bring progress?
>>
>> The choice is not limited to one between conservatives and regressive
>> proggies, idiot.
>>
>
> I didn't say it was.

Of course you did, you liar. You absolutely presented it as a choice
between conservatives - actually, your shitty and completely invalid
caricature of conservatives - and noble "progressives."

> There's all kinds of idiots on both sides of the
> conservative/progressive divide. But there are also people who think on both
> sides.

Stop trying to flatter yourself; you're not a thinker. "Progressivism"
is not about thinking - certainly not critical thinking - at all. If
anything, it's even *more* emotion-based than most strains of conservatism.

>
>>> Wrong, by definition, conservativeswant to move backwards,
>>
>> That's just a fucking lie,
>
> What does the word "conservative" mean to you? Because the word is about
> keeping things the same.

Stop being such a fucking literalist. It's about proceeding slowly
rather than acting on rash impulse, as proggies always want to do. It's
about not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It's about not
changing for change's sake.

>> and you're just a contemptible fucking liar.
>> It is simply a lie to say that conservatives want to resist all
>> change, and an even bigger and stupider fucking lie to say they want to
>> move backward. The painful truth for you, shitbag, is that
>> conservatives are quite often *right* that changes proggies have brought
>> about are bad.
>
> Not all change is good, it's true.

"Progressive" change virtually never is. The very word "progressive" is
supremely arrogant, as well as simply wrong.

> You have to be ready and able to back out in
> the face of unintended consequences.

Proggies *NEVER* are.

> But the world _is_ improving by most sensible measures. Its becoming a less
> violent place. Afluence is spreading to areas where grinding poverty has been
> the norm.

*NONE* of that positive change is due to proggies; it's despite them.
The biggest single positive change is capitalistic economic growth, and
proggies hate than more than they love anything.

[Rudy Canoza]

The Dakotas are among *THE* whitest places in the country. Roselles
would shit his panties if he spent an hour in Oakland.

>>
>>>>>> In his empty fucking skull.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer me.
>>
>> Why would a time element be relevant in answering you dumb fuckwits?
>> Your stupidity and ignorance is enternal.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. It's hardly surprising.
>>
>> Thank YOU for the laugh of accepting a self-proven moron's posts.
>
> Rudy is a brilliant guy.

I wouldn't say that, but I know thousands of times more that is
*correct* and worthwhile than Roselles.

[Ted&Alice Street]

> The Dakotas are among THE whitest places in the country. Roselles

> would shit his panties if he spent an hour in Oakland.
>

That explains it then. He truly and literally has no clue.

> > >
> > > > > > > In his empty fucking skull.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, he can be a real idiot. And I notice he didn't answer
> > > > > > me.
> > >
> > > Why would a time element be relevant in answering you dumb
> > > fuckwits? Your stupidity and ignorance is enternal.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the info. It's hardly surprising.
> > >
> > > Thank YOU for the laugh of accepting a self-proven moron's posts.
> >
> > Rudy is a brilliant guy.
>
> I wouldn't say that, but I know thousands of times more that is

> correct and worthwhile than Roselles.

Yeah, but so do our dogs.

[spudd]

On 4/7/2016 9:34 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> still pissed because blacks got equality.

[Rudy Canoza]

Good point. My dog does Roselles's taxes, and saves him a lot of money.

[Ted&Alice Street]

You probably pay more money in annual taxes than Roselles earns in two
years.

[First-Post]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:27:14 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon

Supposedly social class is the greatest determining factor.
http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/sep/03/social-class-achievement-school

Apparently the white kids have a harder time dealing with being poor
than the ethnic kids do.

[First-Post]

That is a misconception that is most often capitalized on by
progressives.
Conservatives are not simply against change. Most are just against
change for the sake of change which is what progressives seem to be
all about.

Conservatives prefer to have all of the facts and take careful
consideration before making any kind of drastic change.
Progressives just need to hear a little bit of what they want to hear
and then they're on board completely. Take Obamacare for example.
They liked the hype that was pitched to them to the point that they
didn't even need to read what the mandate actually stated. They just
heard "FREE HEALTHCARE" and all consideration ended there.
And now the end result is a 600% increase in the fine for not having
health insurance and even if you do, filing your income taxes has
become a literal nightmare with the 1095s, 3962s and all of the
calculations and information required in order to avoid being
penalized over it.
But hell, "change" was all that mattered so the progressives were more
than happy to jump right in with both feet without even checking the
water first.

And you want to talk of being resistant to change? Try to get any
liberal to reverse on any piece of garbage legislation that was
authored by a liberal and see who flat out refuses to even consider it
even if the law royally sucks.

>
>> and you're just a contemptible fucking liar.
>> It is simply a lie to say that conservatives want to resist all
>>change, and an even bigger and stupider fucking lie to say they want to
>>move backward. The painful truth for you, shitbag, is that
>>conservatives are quite often *right* that changes proggies have brought
>>about are bad.
>
>Not all change is good, it's true. You have to be ready and able to back out in
>the face of unintended consequences.
>
>But the world _is_ improving by most sensible measures. Its becoming a less
>violent place. Afluence is spreading to areas where grinding poverty has been
>the norm.

So you're posting garbage about the rest of the world to mostly USA
specific newsgroups.
Got news for you hotshot. Thanks to Obama's progressive policies and
all of that "change" more Americans are descending into poverty than
are climbing out of it nowadays by a long shot.
You want to talk about shit that goes on in the rest of the world then
post it to the UK or other worldly newsgroups where it might have some
relevance instead of picking a thread where the majority of the
readers live in a nation that is being dragged down into the sewers by
progressivism.

BTW, canoza is a known troll and verified liar. Best kill filed and
ignored.

[First-Post]

On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:49:43 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"

Actually, if you read the threads he replies to and check the
archives, he is pretty much batshit crazy and his stance changes with
the wind direction from topic to topic.
One minute he may be defending conservatism and the next he'll be
ranting about those evil rightists.
Depends on what kind of mood he wakes up in apparently.

[Ted&Alice Street]

LOL. Well I do know that he holds me in complete contempt. But that's
one of the things I like about him. :)

[Rudy Canoza]

Maybe. For certain the guy is a down-market scrounger with no grasp of
reality. If he isn't sucking down public benefits, then I'm a Hottentot.

[Rudy Canoza]

No, that's completely wrong.

> One minute he may be defending conservatism and the next he'll be
> ranting about those evil rightists.

The problem, you right-wing knuckle-dragger, is that you don't
understand libertarianism. You live in a benighted binary world.

There are times when libertarian thought coincides with conservative
thinking, and times when it coincides with (contemporary) liberal
thinking. In nearly all such coincidences, libertarian theory arrives
at the position for entirely different reasons.

You are a doctrinaire knuckle-dragger. Your conservatism is really just
right-wing statism.

[Ted&Alice Street]

LOL. I get the impression that he, Wy, and Tom Sr. are leftists only
because they want for successful people to give them money (unlike the
reasons I'm a leftist). If so, then they should just admit it.

[Rudy Canoza]

The lot of them are leftists purely as a fashion statement.

[Topaz]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:27:14 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon

Anyway you say they are not studying. The problem is not low IQ.


http://www.rense.com/general77/racedif.htm
Race Differences In Average IQ Are Mostly Genetic, Not Cultural
Medical Research News

A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on
state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has
concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic...

"Neither the existence nor the size of race differences in IQ are a
matter of dispute, only their cause," write the authors. The
Black-White difference has been found consistently from the time of
the massive World War I Army testing of 90 years ago to a massive
study of over 6 million corporate, military, and higher-education
test-takers in 2001.

"Race differences show up by 3 years of age, even after matching on
maternal education and other variables," said Rushton. "Therefore they
cannot be due to poor education since this has not yet begun to exert
an effect. That's why Jensen and I looked at the genetic hypothesis in
detail...

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ
tests than Whites,
both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for
use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for
East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks
about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa...

Brain Size Differences. Studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
find a correlation of brain size with IQ of about 0.40. Larger brains
contain more neurons and synapses and process information faster. Race
differences in brain size are present at birth. By adulthood, East
Asians average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites who
average 5 cubic inches more than Blacks...

Racial Admixture Studies. Black children with lighter skin, for
example, average higher IQ scores. In South Africa, the IQ of the
mixed-race "Colored" population averages 85, intermediate to the
African 70 and White 100...

No interventions such as ending segregation, introducing school
busing, or "Head Start" programs have reduced the gaps as culture-only
theory would predict...

[Topaz]

On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:33:44 -0500, First-Post
<Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-A...@DumbassedDemocrats.com>
wrote:

>Supposedly social class is the greatest determining factor.
>http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/sep/03/social-class-achievement-school
>
>Apparently the white kids have a harder time dealing with being poor
>than the ethnic kids do.

The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.

[Bob Tiernan]

The cowardly Topaz said, while hiding behind a fake name like "Gronk":

> The former White nations and Japan are the first world.

Add Israel to that. But since you get your info from David Duke
I'm not surprised that he leaves that out since he hates Jews,
which is also why he ranks the Muslim ("Arab") nations higher.

> The Black nations and India are the third world.

Well, no. India is not Third World. They are too advanced for that.
Just look at their economy.

> In the middle, or the second world are the Arabs and China.

Well, no again. The Arab nations (we'll throw in Iran and Paki-stonn as
well) are not above India. They are not necessarily in the Third World
but are at best at the low end if the Second World list due to the fact
that they are not exactly very productive outside of the mega-dollars
spent by their governments to make the places look nice and industrious,
and the jobs that come off of that (which are nothing special). Also,
Islam itself is what has been keeping back that part of the world.

Even many African nations, those that are not Muslim-dominated, can easily
surpass those Muslim nations that don't have the hang-up that those in the
Mid-east have (which means nations like Indonesia do much better, perhaps
because those areas were not conquered by the Muslim Crusades of long ago
but slowly adopted Islam.

For an example, just look at the difference between India and
"Pocki-stonn". Essentially the same people, when Paki was broken off to
be its own nation, they remained a shit hole while India proper has done
much better. India would have a lot more people had not hundreds of
thousands been murdered by Muslim Crusaders long ago when they were
killing loads of Hindus (Hindu Kush means Hindu killer).


B. T.

--- $ ---

[Alex W.]

Universal education created an educated and hence productive workforce.

Worker protection rights improved productivity (both immediately and
over a lifetime).

Transport infrastructure improved mobility of both the workforce and
companies, thereby increasing productivity and hence wealth.

None of those were "conservative" -- they were all fought for and
achieved by "progressive" elements, not uncommonly to the point of blood
running in the streets.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/9/2016 9:56 AM, Alex W. wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 00:18, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/8/2016 2:32 PM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> But the world _is_ improving by most sensible measures. Its becoming a
>>> less
>>> violent place. Afluence is spreading to areas where grinding poverty
>>> has been
>>> the norm.
>>
>> *NONE* of that positive change is due to proggies; it's despite them.
>> The biggest single positive change is capitalistic economic growth, and
>> proggies hate than more than they love anything.
>>
>
> Universal education created an educated and hence productive workforce.

No, it didn't. It reduced downward wage pressure for adult workers.

> Worker protection rights improved productivity (both immediately and
> over a lifetime).

Bullshit.

> Transport infrastructure improved mobility of both the workforce and
> companies, thereby increasing productivity and hence wealth.

Bullshit. Anyway, that's not a proggie achievement.

> None of those were "conservative"

They weren't proggie.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:32:01 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
<mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:

>What does the word "conservative" mean to you? Because the word is about
>keeping things the same.

No, it's not. That's just "progressive" bullshit.

It means being CAUTIOUS about change, not being ADVERSE to change.
Stop trying to redefine words.

[Rudy Canoza]

It also means categorically rejecting certain types of change, such as
the proggie impulse to want to change human nature. That rejection is
morally and intellectually right and proper.

[Just Wondering]

In today's USA, a political conservative wants to reduce the size and
cost of government, and take unnecessarily stifling regulations off the
backs of small business. Those things all necessarily involve MAJOR change.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:33:51 -0600, Just Wondering <fmh...@comcast.net>
wrote:

I've never seen a conservative who wants to reduce the size and cost
of government.

Never.

I've seen conservatives who SAY that's what they want, however.

[Just Wondering]

On 4/9/2016 12:35 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:

> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:33:51 Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 4/9/2016 11:36 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 4/9/2016 10:30 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:32:01 Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What does the word "conservative" mean to you? Because the word
>>>>> is about keeping things the same.
>>>>
>>>> No, it's not. That's just "progressive" bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> It means being CAUTIOUS about change, not being ADVERSE to change.
>>>
>>> It also means categorically rejecting certain types of change, such as
>>> the proggie impulse to want to change human nature. That rejection is
>>> morally and intellectually right and proper.
>>>
>> In today's USA, a political conservative wants to reduce the size and
>> cost of government, and take unnecessarily stifling regulations off the
>> backs of small business. Those things all necessarily involve MAJOR change.
>
> I've never seen a conservative who wants to reduce the size
> and cost of government. Never. I've seen conservatives who
> SAY that's what they want, however.
>

What you've seen are moderates who falsely claim to be conservatives.
Senator Orrin Hatch is one such example.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:47:28 -0600, Just Wondering <fmh...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Once again, I've never seen a conservative who wants to reduce the

size and cost of government.

Unless you want to call Ron Paul a conservative.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/9/2016 11:33 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 4/9/2016 11:36 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/9/2016 10:30 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:32:01 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
>>> <mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What does the word "conservative" mean to you? Because the word is
>>>> about
>>>> keeping things the same.
>>>
>>> No, it's not. That's just "progressive" bullshit.
>>>
>>> It means being CAUTIOUS about change, not being ADVERSE to change.
>>
>> It also means categorically rejecting certain types of change, such as
>> the proggie impulse to want to change human nature. That rejection is
>> morally and intellectually right and proper.
>>
> In today's USA, a political conservative wants to reduce the size and
> cost of government,

That's a lie. Conservatives *love* big government; they just love it
for different reasons and goals from why leftists love it.

[Rudy Canoza]

Nope. He's talking about actual conservatives.

* defense spending
* massive subsidies to industry
* more defense spending
* still *more* defense spending

Conservatives love big government.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 04/09/2016 12:56 PM, Alex W. wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 00:18, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/8/2016 2:32 PM, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> But the world _is_ improving by most sensible measures. Its becoming a
>>> less
>>> violent place. Afluence is spreading to areas where grinding poverty
>>> has been
>>> the norm.
>>
>> *NONE* of that positive change is due to proggies; it's despite them.
>> The biggest single positive change is capitalistic economic growth, and
>> proggies hate than more than they love anything.
>>
>
> Universal education created an educated and hence productive workforce.

Where? NOT in ObamaVille...

>
> Worker protection rights improved productivity (both immediately and
> over a lifetime).

and now we are to the point of insanity and creating jobless people with
ZERO productivity.

>
> Transport infrastructure improved mobility of both the workforce and
> companies, thereby increasing productivity and hence wealth.

And creating white flight away from the inner cities and leaving them
with no tax base and nothing to do but to deteriorate....

>
> None of those were "conservative" -- they were all fought for and
> achieved by "progressive" elements,

And you can keep the credit for destroying America with those
progressive elements.


--
That's Karma

[Bob Tiernan]

Alex W said:

> Universal education created an educated and hence productive workforce.

Well, yes and no. It "universalized" something, but that something
is now a crappy product compared to what it was when schooling was less
mandatory, less compulsory, less universal. It was pushed by people
who were more or less anti-immigration who wanted to squeeze the
difference out of them (do you like being on that side?), which is why the
Catholic schools started as they were main targets (i.e. Irish and
Italian kids).

Yes, lots of the business interests wanted schooling, such as it came to
be, but are you happy to be on the side of big bad corporations?

Gosh.

The problems of government, i.e. bureaucracy, supremacy of the
bureaucrats, the politicization of schooling policy, all led to
an inevitable crappy product and a crappy system.

> Worker protection rights improved productivity (both immediately and
> over a lifetime).

Technology improved productivity. Also, technology made it easier to
remove early to mid-teens from the work force as fewer people
were needed, and the Left likes to claim that they did it. They pushed
for the laws at the right time. Had they tried earlier when lots of
bodies were needed (everybody needed to pitch in), we would have starved
and would have had far less production. Kids were working, doing labor,
all over the world, usually because they had to.

> Transport infrastructure improved mobility of both the workforce and
> companies, thereby increasing productivity and hence wealth.

That would be part of the American Plan favored by the Whigs (and future
Repubs like Lincoln) and those who came a bit earlier than that party,
such as John Q. Adams. Nothing wrong with it or "unconservative" so long
as it came without all kinds of mandates and junk that modern government
likes to attach to things. Infrastructure is nothing without a free
people who are not being squashed by stupid government. There are places
in the world with good roads and stuff and they don't do well for other
reasons. Besides, don't underestimate the ability or willingness of
people to do stuff without much infrastructure to get something going.
Only a leftwinger would think that no one would want to take a wagon from
St Louis to California in the 1850s unless paved roads were made first.

By the way, paving roads, out in the coutryside between town, was
championed first by bicyclists long before the first cars were around in
America.

> None of those were "conservative" -- they were all fought for and

> achieved by "progressive" elements, not uncommonly to the point
> of blood running in the streets.

It still fell within the framework of a limited government. I could care
less about definitions of "conservative" that people throw around. In
fact, a conservative in the early Republic period and even now can be said
to be someone who wants to preserve the liberal (not leftist) heritage of
America's free society.

It's not hard to grasp. The left just needs to stop seeing American
history as one in which as soon as the Constitution was adopted,
"conservatives" wanted top start shredding it. Blah, blah, blah...

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:53:30 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:06:57 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
><All-Liberal-Policies...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
>wrote:

>
>>On 04/09/2016 12:56 PM, Alex W. wrote:
>

>>>> *NONE* of that positive change is due to p>> roggies; it's despite them.

>>>> The biggest single positive change is capitalistic economic growth, and
>>>> proggies hate than more than they love anything.
>

>The "positive change" from the Industrial revolution on for a couple
>generations---was a horrendous time where workers were killed,
>exploited and the industrialists "ruled". Books were written about
>the excesses---leading (eventually) to the US Govt FINALLY taking
>notice and regulating business and wealth

So Gary sees no good coming from "progress" even though he claims to
be a "progressive" which is all about change. Hmmmmmm.

>And, BTW---the defenders of Segregation, racism, bigotry, homophobia,
>greed (and everything else bad) has been conservatives, ya moron

Democrats. Luckily, Republicans defeated them and ended slavery and
passed civil rights legislation.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/9/2016 9:53 PM, Gary Roselles, who admits to being the dumbest
motherfucker in the Dakotas, lied:

> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:06:57 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> <All-Liberal-Policies...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
> wrote:
>

>> On 04/09/2016 12:56 PM, Alex W. wrote:
>

>>>> *NONE* of that positive change is due to p>> roggies; it's despite them.

>>>> The biggest single positive change is capitalistic economic growth, and
>>>> proggies hate than more than they love anything.
>

> The "positive change" from the Industrial revolution on for a couple
> generations---was a horrendous time

Bullshit.

Just shut the fuck up, Roselles. You know nothing.

[spudd]

On 4/9/2016 10:53 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> You are definitely a faux snoozer

"You called for the death of a sitting US president and the
teenage daughter of a poster you disagreed with...

Oh yeah, you threatened to blow up Mt. Rushmore, too -- said you could
make it look like a mining accident. Especially damning since you
once labored (quite menially, IMA) as a "miner" -- chuckle.

The FBI loved that one.

For your sake, you better hope nothing ever happens to K. Harris, B.
Robertson's teenage daughter or Mt. Rushmore or the next sound you'll
hear is that of a Federal battering ram busting down the door of your
HUD-subsidized government apartment there in Rapid City...

<SNICKER>"

"Gary Roselles" (Yoorghis: 4215 Cedar Ridge Pl, Apt 42, Rapid City, SD
57702) Gets Buster-BUSTED For Lying!!!!!!!!!!!! HAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!

http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/rapidcityjournal.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/a/80/a80c33ed-5d3a-582f-8a41-f76aec29a111/5165a285579a6.preview-620.jpg

[spudd]

On 4/7/2016 9:34 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> Thank YOU for the laugh

[spudd]

On 4/6/2016 9:48 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> Another self-related wet-dream

[spudd]

On 4/6/2016 9:46 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
> That would be you

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:53:30 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>The "positive change" from the Industrial revolution on for a couple

>generations---was a horrendous time where workers were killed,
>exploited and the industrialists "ruled".

The Industrial Revolution marks a major turning point in history;
almost every aspect of daily life was influenced in some way. In
particular, average income and population began to exhibit
unprecedented sustained growth. Some economists say that the major
impact of the Industrial Revolution was that the standard of living
for the general population began to increase consistently for the
first time in history..

No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.

-Lucas, Robert E., Jr. (2002). Lectures on Economic Growth. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.


Here is a pre-I.R. throwback that Gary could get into:
Quilted Northern Rustic Weave | Artisanal Toilet Paper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRlBtabKRFM

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:53:30 -0600, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
>
>> The "positive change" from the Industrial revolution on for a couple
>> generations---was a horrendous time where workers were killed,
>> exploited and the industrialists "ruled".
>
> The Industrial Revolution marks a major turning point in history;
> almost every aspect of daily life was influenced in some way. In
> particular, average income and population began to exhibit
> unprecedented sustained growth. Some economists say that the major
> impact of the Industrial Revolution was that the standard of living
> for the general population began to increase consistently for the
> first time in history..
>
> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.

Roselles is doubly discomfited by that. He is unhappy that people were
benefiting in the first place, and he was even more unhappy because that
benefit - the huge improvement in welfare and happiness - was due to
capitalism. The undeniable fact of that welfare improvement negates
everything he believes.

[Baron Mind]

On 4/10/2016 1:10 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>
>> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.
>
> Roselles is doubly discomfited by that.

So, are you admitting that you are trying to 'gaslight' him?

--
"Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental gestures
which seek to resemble ideas" -Lionel Trilling

[Rudy Canoza]

On 4/10/2016 11:16 AM, Baron Mind wrote:
> On 4/10/2016 1:10 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.
>>
>> Roselles is doubly discomfited by that.
>
> So, are you admitting that you are trying to 'gaslight' him?

Sorry, I don't know that term. I'm not too plugged in with down-market
street slang from deadbeats, so you'll have to explain it.

With my observation - factual - about Roselles discomfiture, I wasn't
trying to "do" anything except state a fact. As far as what I'd really
like to do to Roselles, I'd like to marginalize him and isolate him
completely. Of course, he already does a first-rate job of self
marginalization and isolation. Even among the rest of the regressive
left, Roselles stands out for his crackpot beliefs and bad values.

[Lantern Jaw]

On 4/10/2016 12:16 PM, Baron Mind wrote:
> On 4/10/2016 1:10 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.
>>
>> Roselles is doubly discomfited by that.
>
> So, are you admitting that you are trying to 'gaslight' him?
>

Say Urtie, find any of those gray aliens yet?


------------------------------------------------------------------
My condolensces, I'm just an out of work physicist.
Kurt Lochner - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Kurt Lochner)
Subject: Re: The Coverup
Date: 6 Aug 91 16:46:55 GMT
Quote:
Hi Kurt,
To add to some people's idea that the Greys look like
insects, I'm reminded of an article in the most recent
UFO Magazine in which a man describes an encounter
with beings that looked like insects to him.
----------
I 'll be happy to sent you a copy of this article if
you want it.
Hmm, I'm wondering how you'll send it to me, I presume
US Snail-mail so here's the address....
500 S. State #40
Edmond, OK 73034
I got ahold of a copy of Strieber's Majestic and find
most of it to be interesting. I still get the impression
that the Roswell debris was hijacked in mid-air and that
the government officialdom is still quite embarrassed.
--
Kurt Lochner - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG
---------------------------------------------------------------

[Topaz]

"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the
third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white
countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan,
but nobody says Japan should solve this RACE problem by
bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote
with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem
would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were
brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a
RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK
problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and
what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of
genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable
conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

[Al Czervik]

It is true if you don't count increases in the military which is
mandated by the Constitution (military, not the increases).

[Al Czervik]

On 4/10/2016 11:16 AM, Baron Mind wrote:

> On 4/10/2016 1:10 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.
>>
>> Roselles is doubly discomfited by that.
>
> So, are you admitting that you are trying to 'gaslight' him?

Roselles has zero self-awareness. He lives in a section 8 hovel in the
middle of nowhere. He hasn't worked for 40 years. He regularly confuses
his colostomy bag with a capri sun juice pouch. He dreams of redemption
by tearing others down. He thinks his is a life not squandered.

You can't gaslight someone who is insane.

[None of the Above]

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:06:32 -0700, Al Czervik
<Caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 4/10/2016 11:16 AM, Baron Mind wrote:
>> On 4/10/2016 1:10 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2016 10:49 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No WONDER Gary hates it. People were benefiting from capitalism.
>>>
>>> Roselles is doubly discomfited by that.
>>
>> So, are you admitting that you are trying to 'gaslight' him?
>
>Roselles has zero self-awareness. He lives in a section 8 hovel in the
>middle of nowhere. He hasn't worked for 40 years. He regularly confuses
>his colostomy bag with a capri sun juice pouch.

Ewwwwwwww!

[Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas]

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
news:lqiigbd3epm8rm56v...@4ax.com:

That is sadly and unfortunately true.

--
"...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to
the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a
century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time,
with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."--
Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787

[Bob Tiernan]

Al Czervik said:

> It is true if you don't count increases in the military which is
> mandated by the Constitution (military, not the increases).

It's more of a responsibility than a mandate for the military can
be very, very small. At the time the southern states started seceding,
the US army had only three generals, two of whom defected to the
Confederacy.

[Hot Lantis]

On 4/9/2016 10:53 PM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

> And, BTW---the defenders of Segregation, racism, bigotry, homophobia,

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 04/16/2016 01:31 PM, Hot Lantis wrote:
> On 4/16/2016 5:04 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> In article <7764hbh3mjr17d8ta...@4ax.com>,
>> None of the Above <E...@erg.oy> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:09:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <XnsA5EB5ED9634...@127.0.0.1>,
>>>> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:hlwdjsd2-C0FA51...@news.giganews.com Jeanne
>>>>> Douglas
>>>>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <XnsA5EAC8BCDAF78We...@213.239.209.88>,
>>>>>> Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
>>>>>> <nuke_them_...@sulaco.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but on balance socialism is really good at killing people and
>>>>>>> destroying the lives of those it let's live.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Funny that I'm not seeing this mass murder in any of the Scandinavian
>>>>>> countries....
>>>>>
>>>>> But the Scandinavian countries aren't "socialist" in any sense of the
>>>>> word.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are, by and large, high tax welfare states.
>>>>>
>>>>> The true socialist states like China, the late Soviet Union, North
>>>>> Korea
>>>>> and the other failed People's Republics, are hellholes which imprison
>>>>> their population and systematically murder those with inconvenient
>>>>> ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tens of millions have been murdered by China and the Soviet Union.
>>>>>
>>>>> North Korea simply starves its population. Venezuela is on its way
>>>>> to do
>>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>> But none of those people were killed by socialism, they were killed by
>>>> tyranny.
>>>
>>> ...Tyranny being the inevitable result of socialism.
>>
>> Nonsense.
>
> FACT!!!
>
>> Do you not know the difference between socialism and communism?

Communism executes its people, while Socialism starves its people to
death?


But once you are dead, does it really matter which one got you there?


--
One man's Affirmative Action law is another man's Jim Crow law.


That's Karma

[Hot Lantis]

Well the compassion factor is one of the premises that communism tends
to shed, yes...

> But once you are dead, does it really matter which one got you there?

Uber or Lyft, it's all a 'free ride' at the people's expense...

[Malcolm McMahon]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:27:14 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
><mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:46:50 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
>>><mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Interesting stats in the UK. The ethnic group that does _worst_ at school
>>>>are
>>>>caucasians.
>>>
>>>Maybe they don't like the PC agenda of the school. It's a proven fact
>>>that Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. That
>>>explains why Africa is so backward.
>>>
>>
>>Oh come on! We're talking kids here, not political idealogues. They don't
>>give
>>a monkey's about ideology and the implications of history.
>>
>>You can't seriously imagine they are not studying because they object to the
>>teacher's political views. It would appear they aren't studying because they
>>can't be arsed.
>
>Anyway you say they are not studying. The problem is not low IQ.
>

What the hell is the use of IQ if you're too idle to use it? Or too bitter from
an excessive sense of entitlement?

IQ is only one determinant of being a good and valued citizen. Far more
important are impulse control and self-discipline. Empathy and "emotional
inteligence".

[Topaz]

On Mon, 2 May 2016 12:18:38 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
<mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:


>
>What the hell is the use of IQ if you're too idle to use it? Or too bitter from
>an excessive sense of entitlement?

The higher IQ averages of White people make for very nice neigborhoods
and countries.

>
>IQ is only one determinant of being a good and valued citizen. Far more
>important are impulse control and self-discipline. Empathy and "emotional
>inteligence".
>

Maybe, but we should preserve the White race by having a nation for
White people. And besides other things, Whites are very good looking.

[RD Sandman]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:ccefibp4irhtiihbu...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 2 May 2016 12:18:38 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
> <mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>What the hell is the use of IQ if you're too idle to use it? Or too
>>bitter from an excessive sense of entitlement?
>
> The higher IQ averages of White people make for very nice neigborhoods
> and countries.
>
>
>>
>>IQ is only one determinant of being a good and valued citizen. Far
>>more important are impulse control and self-discipline. Empathy and
>>"emotional inteligence".
>>
>
> Maybe, but we should preserve the White race by having a nation for
> White people.

In some places you still have it.

> And besides other things, Whites are very good looking.

There are members of all groups that are very good looking. What's new or
different about whites? I assume that you know why the whites are white
and blacks are black.....or am I assuming too much?

--

RD (The Sandman)

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too much
while ten bullets in the possession of mother protecting
her children may not be enough.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Al Czervik]

On 5/2/2016 2:16 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
> Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:ccefibp4irhtiihbu...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 2 May 2016 12:18:38 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon
>> <mal...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> What the hell is the use of IQ if you're too idle to use it? Or too
>>> bitter from an excessive sense of entitlement?
>>
>> The higher IQ averages of White people make for very nice neigborhoods
>> and countries.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> IQ is only one determinant of being a good and valued citizen. Far
>>> more important are impulse control and self-discipline. Empathy and
>>> "emotional inteligence".
>>>
>>
>> Maybe, but we should preserve the White race by having a nation for
>> White people.
>
> In some places you still have it.
>
>> And besides other things, Whites are very good looking.
>
> There are members of all groups that are very good looking. What's new or
> different about whites? I assume that you know why the whites are white
> and blacks are black.....or am I assuming too much?

A country of people attracted to each other would be white men and Asian
women:
http://techland.time.com/2013/11/26/dating-app-reveals-troubling-racial-preferences/

[RD Sandman]

Al Czervik <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ng8mn1$o5f$1...@dont-email.me:

Not just white men.

[Al Czervik]

Other men are attracted to Asian women but they aren't attracted to them.

[RD Sandman]

Al Czervik <Caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in news:ng93u4$rgh$1@dont-
email.me:

Oh, I don't know about that.....I do know (or knew) several asian girls
before I married a Mexican.

[Topaz]

On Mon, 02 May 2016 16:16:17 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsa...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>> Maybe, but we should preserve the White race by having a nation for
>> White people.
>
>In some places you still have it.

No, there is no government that is for White people, and the Jews rule
over most former White countries.

>
>> And besides other things, Whites are very good looking.
>
>There are members of all groups that are very good looking. What's new or
>different about whites?

No matter which non-White country one visits, they'll notice local
advertising which features models which have lighter skin and more
White features. Radical leftists and social engineers attribute this
to so-called "White institutionalized racism" No, it's because the
geometry of a White face combined with lighter skin color is
instinctively more appealing to the brain. Of course there are
exceptions, but broadly this is true, which is why White is the gold
standard for beauty globally.

Full article w/ photos:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=634099

> I assume that you know why the whites are white
>and blacks are black.....or am I assuming too much?

Not really sure, but this article hints at it:


"The Great Separation, in which proto-Whites left Africans behind, was
a turning point in the upward evolution of Man. Have we reached
another, downward, turning point?

Only the most ambitious of the early humans in Africa possessed the
curiosity to venture beyond their "comfort zone" and migrate out of
the continent in search of new adventures and opportunities. It was
this northward migration that exposed our progenitors to the new
climates and environments that would guide their evolution. This was
the historic moment that signaled the future birth of our race and all
its advancements-and the relatively backward nature of those tribes
who remained in the tropics.

Leaving their predecessors behind, the fledgling stock pushed onward.
Changing selection pressures would favor those mutations that bestowed
upon the new stock reasoning abilities, deductive thinking, and logic.
These traits would be necessary in order for the new breed of man, the
White man, to survive the colder climates to the north.
The winter season brings new challenges and obstacles to the stock.
For months at a time the fertile soil becomes a frozen, barren land,
incapable of cultivation-an inhospitable climate where even short
exposures can quickly lead to frostbite and death. Gone were the days
of endless warmth and pursuing only those behaviors that offered the
reward of immediate gratification. The new breed needed to have the
vision to see into the future and make plans ahead of time, if they
were to survive.

Through a long and rigorous process, subsistence hunting and food
gathering, and building temporary structures from mud or straw were
replaced by agriculture, domestication of livestock, and true
architecture. These are among hallmarks of civilization achieved by
early Whites. And it was only when the fundamental problems of day-to-
day survival had been solved that the mind could be free to ponder the
higher things in life-and the infinite possibilities of the future. A
future with automobiles, refrigerators, television, radios, cell
phones, satellites, and space travel. Look around you: the White man
invented virtually everything you see.

The paucity of invention by sub-Saharan Africans-it is virtually
nil-is evident. This lack of creative thinking is so because the
Africans left behind did not follow the proto-Whites along their
migration routes out of Africa-and hence did not evolve in the same
way. It was the genetic response to the changing selection pressures
generated by the exposure to the colder climates of the north that
elicited the changes in the genome that made our race, civilization,
and mighty technology possible.

To this day, the Blacks who remain in their cradle of comfort along
the equatorial zones of the earth, as well as those transplanted
around the world by slavery in recent centuries, remain several steps
below the White men and women of the West in measured intelligence,
self-restraint, civilized behavior, artistic and scientific
accomplishments, and sexual morality.

Just as the transitions from ape-like creatures to pre-man and then to
early African man were giant steps for mankind, so too was the
transformation of early African man into the White European race
during his eons-long journey to the north. It was Whites who gave us
the architecture of the Parthenon, the Pantheon and St. Basil's
cathedral, the music of Mozart and Beethoven, the artwork of
Michelangelo and Monet, and the vision of Galileo. It was the vast
collection of knowledge assimilated by the white European minds of
scientists like Newton and Maxwell that gave us our vast understanding
of chemistry and the laws of physics-and all the power that implies.
Meanwhile, the tribes of sub-Saharan Africa, regardless of where they
may have relocated in modern times, are still swatting flies, digging
grubs and sacrificing chickens.

In some ways, slavery was the best thing that ever happened to the
Blacks-who never could have found their way to America (and the
gravy-train provided by guilt-ridden Whites) on their own. Even today,
native Blacks have never shown the capability to build a boat capable
of crossing the Atlantic. Enslavement, torture, rape, and murder were
hardly unique to the Black slaves taken to America-such was the norm
in Africa (most of the transported slaves were already slaves while
there) and slavery remains an institution there to this day. In our
world's rich history of war, every race has suffered brutal treatment,
attempted genocide, and forced emigration at the hands of rival races
and nations. Even today in Africa, Blacks are hunted down, raped,
tortured, enslaved, and killed by the millions-at the hands of their
own "brothers."

Here in America, Blacks enjoy ample food, clean water, and the
opportunity for a good education, as well as the innumerable modern
conveniences we all take for granted. Blacks get to be entertainment
stars and athletes... but still, they complain about the White man.
They riot in the streets and commit a disproportionately high amount
of crime. Even very successful Blacks, who "have it all," like O. J.
Simpson, Kobe Bryant, and Michael Jackson find it difficult to rise
above their genetic propensity for violence or disrespect toward
others. The savage behavior of Black sports stars toward White women
is so legendary that it's become a part of folklore and taken almost
for granted, as is the brutal deviant sexual behavior of Black men in
prison, with young White males the usual victims.

Most alarming to decent Whites is the current push in America for
White girls to misuse their wombs as cradles for primitive Congoid
genes-instead of for the sacred purpose for which they were intended.
While such "mothers" are exalted by the Jewish media as shining
beacons of light for a new, multiracial society, their children have
been condemned to inherit genes hundreds of thousands of years behind
those that built the West. They have been robbed of their genetic
potential. The mother and her thousands of generations of ancestors'
contribution to the forward evolution of life have come to a
screeching halt. The African DNA wraps itself like a parasitic vine
around the White helix, chocking the life out of it. This is an act of
genocide against our people, and should be prosecuted as such.
Schools, under the thumb of our enemies or in the thrall of the
"equality" religion, have relaxed academic eligibility requirements.
They must eliminate all evidence of racial inequality and "close the
education gap" between Whites and non-Whites-or risk losing funding.
If we can't bring the minorities up to the achievement levels of the
Whites, we'll bring the Whites down to their level. If we can't bring
the bottom of the bell curve up, we'll bring the top down. That way,
they'll all be equal-equally stupid.

And is that not what we are seeing-not just in the schools, but
everywhere in our society?

When you look around, do you see evidence that Blacks have conformed
to White standards of culture, civility, and grace? -- or do you see
Whites conforming to Black norms of disrespect, crudity, ugliness, and
ignorance? Do you see Black kids walking down the street dressed in
fine clothes, listening to Mozart, and carrying their physics books?
-- or are you more likely to see White children wearing baggy gang
clothes, listening to "rap," sporting multiple body piercings (an
African custom), speaking Ebonics, with a concealed crack pipe in
their pocket, and obsessed with empty, lower-than-animal sex?
On the whole, have the Whites influenced the Blacks in a positive
direction, or have the Blacks influenced the Whites in a negative
direction? Even if the answer is "some of both," there is no way to
argue that we of the West have gained in any way by the association."

Fritz Wuehler

[Topaz]

On Mon, 2 May 2016 16:12:48 -0700, Al Czervik
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:


>A country of people attracted to each other would be white men and Asian
>women:
>http://techland.time.com/2013/11/26/dating-app-reveals-troubling-racial-preferences/
>

If so it must be because White women are generally feminists.
Otherwise they would be the most attractive. I don't know which Asian
women compare to Jennifer Aniston for example.

[Harold Burton]

In article <hlwdjsd2-BDB45B...@news.giganews.com>,
Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> In article <XnsA603AAC979E...@127.0.0.1>,
> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> > In news:hlwdjsd2-A7554E...@news.giganews.com Jeanne Douglas

> > <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <XnsA5EB5ED9634...@127.0.0.1>,
> > > Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Tens of millions have been murdered by China and the Soviet Union.
> > >>
> > >> North Korea simply starves its population. Venezuela is on its way to
> > >> do the same.
> > >
> > > But none of those people were killed by socialism, they were killed by
> > > tyranny.
> >

> > Real socialism requires tyranny.
>
> Bullshit.

Spouting nonsense again, eh Jeanne.