Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences

[a425couple]

Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences
Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett, Fox News
Facebook

Former AG Lynch to meet with House Intel Committee
The former attorney general will testify as a part of the Russia
investigation.

I don’t believe in coincidences. Not when it comes to crimes. Especially
when they involve political corruption.

No such thing as a coincidence. Doesn’t exist.

Yet, we are led to believe it was merely a coincidence that Bill
Clinton just happened to be on the tarmac of an Arizona airport at the
same time as then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch. We are supposed to
accept that their private meeting on board Lynch’s plane had nothing
whatsoever to do with the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton
which the A-G was overseeing at the time.

Right. They just “schmoozed” about grandkids and what-not.

I guess it was also just a coincidence that a few days after the furtive
tarmac meeting the decision was announced that criminal charges against
Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, would not be filed,
notwithstanding compelling evidence that she repeatedly violated the
Espionage Act by storing highly classified documents on her private,
unauthorized and unsecured email server in the basement of her home.

Sure. Makes perfect sense. To a naïve, gullible fool.

Maybe it was purely a coincidence that there was another FBI
investigation going on involving Russia’s corruption-fueled purchase of
U.S uranium assets and which also happened to implicate the Clintons,
but was kept hidden from Congress and the American people by Lynch and
her predecessor, Eric Holder. Hmm…

And perhaps it was simply an odd coincidence that the investigation of
this uranium bribery, extortion, money laundering and kickback case was
supervised by then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, his successor James
Comey, and then-U.S Attorney Rod Rosenstein, all of whom appear to have
covered it up but are now directly involved in the Trump-Russia probe.

Strange confluence of people and events, eh?

I don’t buy any of it. Not for one minute. And not entirely because I
don’t believe in coincidences. It is because all the above-mentioned
people are known to trifle with the law or ignore disqualifying
conflicts of interest. They seem to be without principles --devoid of
the kind of scruples that should guide people in service of our government.

Mueller is serving as special counsel in the Trump-Russia case. He
reports to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who appointed him.

Yet both Rosenstein and fired FBI Director James Comey are witnesses in
the case, since Rosenstein recommended to President Trump that Comey be
fired.

It is well established that Comey and Mueller are long-time friends,
allies and former partners. How can Mueller be fair and impartial given
these glaring conflicts of interest? He cannot. And he should recuse
himself. Rosenstein should also step aside in overseeing the case. He
cannot be prosecutor and witness simultaneously.

Their conflicts are compounded by recent reports that all three men were
involved in the Russian uranium case which was kept hidden from
Congress. How can Americans have confidence in the outcome of the
Trump-Russia case if they engaged in a cover-up of the Clinton-Russia
case?

Which brings us to Hillary and Bill. The Clinton name is synonymous with
scandal. The sleazy Whitewater land deals, an illicit affair with a
young White House intern that led to impeachment, deceptions following
the Benghazi murders, Travelgate, cattle futures, suspected slush funds,
evidence of perjury, the list is seemingly endless.

Through it all, the ability of the Clintons to evade indictments would
make Houdini proud. They are escape artists of the highest order.

Loretta Lynch should never have presided over the Hillary Clinton email
case. She owed her career to none other than Bill Clinton who nominated
her to serve as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York which
nicely positioned her for elevation to Attorney General a few years later.

She should have recused herself from the Hillary probe from the outset,
but did not. Only when the ethically-challenged tarmac meeting took
place did she step aside. Belatedly. Supposedly. I have my doubts.

On Friday, Lynch met behind closed doors with the House Intelligence
Committee. Too bad the public was deprived of witnessing an attempt to
elicit the truth. But secrecy is endemic in Washington, which is
precisely why it is so easy to obscure the truth when power corrupts.

Lynch was likely asked to explain the full content of the infamous
tarmac conversation with Bill Clinton that lasted approximately 30
minutes. Did Clinton remind Lynch of how much she owed him? Are we to
believe that he never broached the potential indictment of his wife with
the very person who could decide her fate?

It is likely Lynch was asked by the Intel Committee if she ever directed
Comey to mischaracterize the Clinton email case as a “matter” instead of
what it truly was, a criminal investigation. Was Lynch downplaying the
case because she planned to scuttle any criminal charges? Did she assure
anyone in the Clinton orbit that prosecution would never happen,
incriminating evidence be damned?

Finally, why did Lynch allow Comey to usurp the power of the Attorney
General in announcing that no criminal charges would be forthcoming
against Clinton? It was bad enough that Comey misinterpreted the law on
“intent” and “gross negligence,” but Lynch appears to have allowed her
office to acquiesce in Comey’s decision. Why?

Since Friday’s hearing was secretive, we may never learn the answers to
serious questions that appear to involve lawlessness and rampant
corruption.

Instead, we are left to wonder whether it was all just a confluence of
fantastic coincidences.

Gregg Jarrett is a Fox News legal analyst and former defense attorney.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/20/gregg-jarrett-lynch-clintons-and-series-fantastic-coincidences.html

[Bill Shatzer]

a425couple wrote:
> Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences
> Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett, Fox News
> Facebook

Yet more Russian disinformation.

[poor dumb curt]

On 10/21/2017 9:41 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> Russian disinformation.
>

How much longer can you survive as a KNOWN traitor?

I'm always reminded of YOUR very *special personal sentiments* regarding
the tragic terror attacks of 911, Bill:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bill Shatzer wrote:

And over 4,000 Americans have paid with their lives for that little
adventure. Plus a half a trillion dollars in national treasure
You might compare that with the number of lives lost on 9-11. Or the
economic injury incurred from that event.

It would have been cheaper in both lives and money to just suffer
another 9-11 every six or seven years.

Peace and justice,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I think we can ALL do well to reflect on what kind of sick sociopath
would come up with those words in honor of 911...


Oh and let's add in your death threat against the President:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Anyone else notice the similarities between Trump's attacks on the
"lying media" and "fake news" and the Nazi smear campaign against the
"Lugenpresse"?

You can, as they say, look it up.

This man must be stopped - peacefully if possible, otherwise if necessary.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Twisted Billy, you are one twisted fascist.

[a425couple]

On 10/21/2017 8:41 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> a425couple wrote:
>> Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences
>> Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett,    Fox News
>> Facebook
>
> Yet more Russian disinformation.

Nonsense. Lynch while AG did meet with Bill Clinton, the husband
of a person under investigation, and even she/Lynch regrets
it's appearance.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/loretta-lynch-i-do-regret-meeting-with-bill-clinton-in-june/article/2609954

"Loretta Lynch: 'I do regret' meeting with Bill Clinton in June
by Anna Giaritelli | Dec 18, 2016, 4:21 PM
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said on Sunday she regrets secretly
meeting with former President Bill Clinton last June because of the
negative impression it gave some voters.

"I do regret sitting down and having a conversation with him because it
did give people concern. And as I said, my greatest concern has always
been making sure that people understand that the Department of Justice
works in a way that is independent and looks at everybody equally,"
Lynch said on CNN's "State of the Union."

[hal lillywhite]

On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> a425couple wrote:
> > Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences
> > Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett, Fox News
> > Facebook
>
> Yet more Russian disinformation.

??? Evidence that the Russians are the source of that information?

[Bill Shatzer]

Evidence? Don't need no stinking evidence.

Trump doesn't need evidence for any of his wild assertions. Certainly if
it's good enough for Trump, it ought to be good enough for us commoners.

peace and justice,m

[Dr. Cal Meacham]

On 10/24/2017 1:43 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> hal lillywhite wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>>> a425couple wrote:
>>>> Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic
>>>> coincidences
>>>> Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett,    Fox News
>>>> Facebook
>>>
>>> Yet more Russian disinformation.
>>
>> ??? Evidence that the Russians are the source of that information?
>
> Evidence?  Don't need no stinking evidence.

Bugger off, Uranium TRAITOR!

https://www.infowars.com/clinton-foundation-did-not-report-russian-uranium-one-payments-wall-street-analyst-argues/


WASHINGTON, D.C. As Senator Chuck Grassley and the Senate Judiciary
Committee are starting to evaluate public disclosures of the Clinton
Foundation and of its affiliate in Canada, the Clinton-Giustra
Sustainable Growth Initiative (“CGSGI”), Wall Street analyst Charles
Ortel, in a detailed analysis of Clinton Foundation financial accounting
reports, reveals what he believes is a systematic pattern of fraud
designed to hide payments the Clinton Foundation reportedly received
related to the Uranium One deal.
To stress the gravity of the Clinton Foundation’s Russian Uranium One
scandal, Ortel told Infowars.com that he believes Clinton Foundation
financial reports are criminally fraudulent in failing to report
payments received in relation to the Russian Uranium One Scandal — a
criminal omission Ortel believes could cause the Clintons their fortune
and leave them no option but to face jail time.
In other words, the campaign chant “Lock Her Up!” may still be a reality
looming for Hillary Clinton.
The financial ties between Russia and the Clintons was first documented
in the Uranium One scandal by New York Times reporters Jo Becker and
Mike McIntire, in an article entitled “Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Amid Russian Uranium Deal,” that the newspaper printed on April 23, 2015.
“As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three
separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow
of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation,” Becker and McIntire wrote.
“Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four
donations totaling $2.35 million,” the New York Times reporters
continued. “Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the
Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama
White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to
the company made donations as well.”
Becker and McIntire further noted that shortly after the Russians
announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian
investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One
stock.
Current reports suggest as much as $145 million may have flowed to the
Clinton Foundation from the Russian Uranium One deal, but the money
cannot be found anywhere in the Clinton Foundation financial reporting,
argues Ortel.
“The truth is that use of the Clinton Foundation as an unregulated
conduit through which cash likely was traded for influence is a story
that began at that entity’s birth on 23 October 1997 and continues to
present–no part of the Clinton Foundation and none of the Clinton
Foundation’s many ‘affiliates’ has ever been properly overseen by
trustees, audited by accountants, or even validly organized by its
lawyers for 20 years,” Ortel explained to Infowars.com in an exclusive
interview.
Ortel stressed no outsider actually knows what happened to all sums that
may have been sent towards the Clinton family.
However, he acknowledged, it is possible to discern, through digging,
that significant portions of these supposed donations “leaked” (were
diverted) along the way.
Uranium One, CGSGI, and the Clinton Foundation
Ortel’s examination of the Clinton Foundation, now extending into its
fourth year, has driven Ortel to search for and acquire detailed
financial reports for the Clinton Foundation, stretching back to the
foundation’s inception, including all audited financial statements, as
well as all available state and federal regulatory filings, including
required annual IRS tax filings.
Ortel pointed out that the available Clinton Foundation regulatory
filings are riddled with what appear to be intentional ommissions.”
Take 2009 results , for example, completed during 2010,” Ortel argued.
“You will not find combining results for the Clinton Foundation, by
“Initiative” on the Clinton Foundation website as these are purposefully
omitted. But you will find these key results on versions of the
required audit that are obtained here in New York (punch in EIN:
31-1580204) and look at the 2009 filing.”
Ortel draw attention to the audit page towards the end of the filing for
2009 called “Combined Statement of Activities.”
“These show total contributions (normally these are from the general
public) of $82.9 million and total grants (normally these are from
governments and from foundations) of $162.9 million,” he continued.
“Focus on the column “CHAI” (Clinton Health Access Initiative) that
shows contributions of $15.5 million (19% of the combined total) and
$159.7 in grants (98% of the total). Clearly “CHAI” existed during 2009
as a material portion of the Clinton Foundation.”
But, Ortel asks, who contributed $159.7 million to “CHAI” in 2009?
“By going here, we find that a Swiss NGO called UNITAID may have
contributed $85 million during 2009 (see column for 2009 and row marked
“Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, Inc.” at page 30),” he continued.
“Then look at the Clinton Foundation link at “Schedule B” that lists
(without identifying) amounts given by each specific, major donor. These
show small cash grants of $73.7 million, small stock grants of $5.2
million, and unidentified cash grants of $115.4 million, $$9.1 million,
$7.1 million, $15.9 million, $7.1 million, and $7.8 million.”
Ortel concludes: “There is no $85 million grant from UNITAID listed and
there is no grant listed in 2009 that may have been routed through CGSGI
from Russia or from any other source–in fact the combining statement
shows $100 (not a typo) in contributions, and only $1.5 million in
grants for ‘CGSGI.’”
He explained to Infowars.com that he considers it shocking the true
financial picture is not told in existing Clinton Foundation filings for
2009 that have circulated in the public domain, around the world, for 7
years.
“Now the IRS has had much more detailed information on this ever since
2010 when the Clinton Foundation filed their Annual Report for 2009 on
Form 990,” Ortel continued.
He pointed out that IRS officials know the specific identities of each
major donor and, for U.S. donors, they can readily pull tax forms to
determine how much each donor claimed it sent towards Clinton entities.
“There are many major U.S. charities worth looking at in forms relating
to 2009 include,” he pointed out. “These include the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (U.S.)
(there is also a U.K. version, and then other large cumulative
contributors through December 2008, some of whom likely continued
donating in 2009.”
Ortel pointed out, stressing that each of the foundations contributing
to the Clinton Foundation may face serious civil and possibly criminal
liabilities should the U.S. Congress and the U.S. legal system find the
Clinton Foundation guilty of charity fraud.
The Clinton Foundation: A vast unregulated interlocking set of criminal
enterprises?
Ortel argues that while above is an important and worthwhile exercise,
investigators need to become more familiar with applicable laws
concerning tax-exempt organizations–a brief summary is found here:
“The Clinton Foundation was originally organized as a ‘Presidential
Library’ to be a repository for ‘Presidential Records,’ but it has never
validly altered its controlling ‘Articles of Organization’ to engage in
any other tax-exempt purpose,” Ortel stressed. “Yet, it and people
claiming to work with it have roamed worldwide soliciting more than $2
billion in cumulative declared donations.”
Ortel’s point is that ever since 23 October 1997, the Clinton
Foundation, its trustees, its executives, and its agents seems to have
been using the mails, telephones, and the internet to solicit massive
donations while false and materially misleading filings circulated in
the public domain.
“This ongoing, criminal solicitation is a massive scandal hidden in
plain sight that certainly is illegal,” Ortel insists. “Just ask former
U.S. Congresswoman Corrine Brown who awaits sentencing on numerous
federal counts for illegally operating a much smaller slush fund.”
“Where did all that money actually go?” Ortel asks, regarding the money
the New York Times in 2015 reported flowing to the Clintons and the
Clinton Foundation as a result of the Uranium One deal
“Was even more money sent towards the Clintons?” he asks. “Why have no
donors, including other foundations, many governments, and prominent
individuals, complained about the reckless governance and slipshod
‘accounting’ for what the Clinton’s yet maintain is a charity.”
For the Clintons, Nov. 15, 2017 – an important deadline
Ortel insists these are the real questions Senator Grassley, the House
Judiciary Committee, state attorneys general, foreign government
authorities, and the public around the world should be asking.
He stresses answers are required soon–the final tax filing deadline for
the Clinton Foundation and for several of its affiliates is Nov. 15, 2017.
“By that date, all previous tax filings for the Clinton Foundation must
be amended and supplied on a complete basis, including real, legally
compliant audits by competent and independent accounting firms,” he
points out. “Only then, can the Clinton Foundation (and certain
affiliates) validly file IRS Reports on the required annual Tax Filing
Form 990.”
Ortel reminds us that the United States of America, no one is above the law.
“It is past time to prove to we, the people, and to demonstrate
globally, that the Clintons and their allies are not immune from
prosecution, and from making restitution because they chose to become
politically active,” Ortel said
“The Clinton Foundation and its network of affiliates has been operated
for more than 20 years as a vast conspiracy to defraud the United States
Government (see U.S.C. §371),” he noted.
“Close examination reveals numerous potential counts of mail fraud in
connection with disaster relief (see U.S.C. §1341) and wire fraud in
connection with wire relief (see U.S.C. §1343). Trained lawyers should
see many more potential felony violations of federal laws, as well as
violations of state and of foreign statutes,” he pointed out.
Justice must be served at long last, Ortel insists, and America, along
with the entire world, is now watching.

[poor dumb curt]

On 10/24/2017 1:43 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:

> Certainly if it's good enough for Trump, it ought to be good enough for
> us commoners.

[hal lillywhite]

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 12:43:23 PM UTC-7, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> hal lillywhite wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> >> a425couple wrote:
> >>> Gregg Jarrett: Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences
> >>> Gregg Jarrett By Gregg Jarrett, Fox News
> >>> Facebook
> >>
> >> Yet more Russian disinformation.
> >
> > ??? Evidence that the Russians are the source of that information?
>
> Evidence? Don't need no stinking evidence.

So you admit that you have no evidence, you are just making up the accusation.
Sounds like lying to me.

> Trump doesn't need evidence for any of his wild assertions. Certainly if
> it's good enough for Trump, it ought to be good enough for us commoners.

So you say all sorts of nasty things about Trump, then put yourself on the level
where you claim he is. Do you really want to do that?

[Bill Shatzer]

I ain't gonna play by the Marquis of Queensbury rules while your side
uses brass knuckles and engages in eye gouging and groin kicking. I've
tried to play nice and it doesn't seem to have worked.

Trump is an immediate danger to the republic in particular and democracy
in general. Gloves off!

Viva la résistance! Up against the wall mutha!

No peace, no justice.

[poor dumb curt]

On 10/24/2017 4:01 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> I ain't gonna play by the Marquis of Queensbury rules while your side
> uses brass knuckles and engages in

Calling the President "insane"?

Face it Shitzer, you miserable piece of leftard filth - YOU are a a
total scumbag and so is your entire lamestream media pack of jackal-whores..

Die real soon, you traitor to America!

[hal lillywhite]

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 3:01:18 PM UTC-7, Bill Shatzer wrote:

> > So you say all sorts of nasty things about Trump, then put yourself on the level
> > where you claim he is. Do you really want to do that?
>
> I ain't gonna play by the Marquis of Queensbury rules while your side
> uses brass knuckles and engages in eye gouging and groin kicking.

Never wrestle with a pig in the muck. You both get dirty and the pig enjoys it.

And it is only one representative of "my" side (if you really think Trump is
representative), hardly reason to tar everybody with the same brush. And I'm not
sure Trump is lying, likely he really believes what he says. I'm afraid I can't
say the same for your accusation about the Russians being behind the information
about the Clintons.

> I've
> tried to play nice and it doesn't seem to have worked.

Cold it be that your statist outlook is just plain wrong? Maybe you are losing
because the other side has a better program.

> Trump is an immediate danger to the republic in particular and democracy
> in general. Gloves off!

How is he an immediate danger to anything but big government? He spouts off with
horrible stuff but his actions are better than his verbage. On the other hand,
your side squeals like a stuck pig when Trump obeys the law in such matters as
DACA and illegal diversion of funds for Obamacare.

[a425couple]

On 10/24/2017 3:01 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:

So here, Bill Shatzer, descending into madness, declares
that since POTUS Trump, along with POTUS Obama and
currupt Clinton, tell falsehoods,
he no longer even cares to try to tell the truth.
Sheesh.
He used to be at least a mostly honest thieving liberal!

> hal lillywhite wrote:

>> On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 12:43:23, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>>> hal lillywhite wrote:

[poor dumb curt]

On 10/25/2017 12:05 PM, Baxter wrote:
> Well, that's a step in the right direction -

You're a sick, racist, mentally disturbed old heart patient who pimped
himself out as a slumlord!

But first your heart is spasming again, innit?

Better take your nitroglycerin pills, bypass boy, your arteries are
clogging up again...


| \ \ | |/ /
| |\ `' ' /
| ;'aorta \ / , pulmonary
| ; _, | / / , arteries
superior | | ( `-.;_,-' '-' ,
vena cava | `, `-._ _,-'_
|,-`. `.) ,<_,-'_, pulmonary
,' `. / ,' `;-' _, veins
; `./ /`, \-'
| right / | ;\ |\
| atrium ;_,._|_, `, ' \
| \ \ ` `,
` __ ` \ left ;,
\ ,' ` \, ventricle
\_( ;, ;;
| \ `;, ;;
inferior | |`. `;;, ;'
vena cava | | `-. ;;;;,;' FL
| | |`-.._ ,;;;;;'
| | | | ``';;;'
aorta





BAXTURD's PETER METER

|=====|
| |
| 9 |
| | ,-%/%|
| 6 | _,-' \//%\
| | _,-' \%/|%
| 3 | / / ) __,-- /%\
| | \__/_,-'%(% ; %)%
| 0 | %\%, %\
|=====| '--%'
__________________________________________________________________________
"At my age, I don't need balls. I'm done with the procreation
stuff." You're a sick, racist, mentally disturbed old heart patient who
pimped himself out as a slumlord!

But first your heart is spasming again, innit?

Better take your nitroglycerin pills, bypass boy, your arteries are
clogging up again...


| \ \ | |/ /
| |\ `' ' /
| ;'aorta \ / , pulmonary
| ; _, | / / , arteries
superior | | ( `-.;_,-' '-' ,
vena cava | `, `-._ _,-'_
|,-`. `.) ,<_,-'_, pulmonary
,' `. / ,' `;-' _, veins
; `./ /`, \-'
| right / | ;\ |\
| atrium ;_,._|_, `, ' \
| \ \ ` `,
` __ ` \ left ;,
\ ,' ` \, ventricle
\_( ;, ;;
| \ `;, ;;
inferior | |`. `;;, ;'
vena cava | | `-. ;;;;,;' FL
| | |`-.._ ,;;;;;'
| | | | ``';;;'
aorta





BAXTURD's PETER METER

|=====|
| |
| 9 |
| | ,-%/%|
| 6 | _,-' \//%\
| | _,-' \%/|%
| 3 | / / ) __,-- /%\
| | \__/_,-'%(% ; %)%
| 0 | %\%, %\
|=====| '--%'
__________________________________________________________________________
"At my age, I don't need balls. I'm done with the procreation stuff."

[None of the Above]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:40:50 -0700, a425couple
<a425c...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On 10/24/2017 3:01 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>
>So here, Bill Shatzer, descending into madness, declares
>that since POTUS Trump, along with POTUS Obama and
>currupt Clinton, tell falsehoods,
>he no longer even cares to try to tell the truth.
>Sheesh.
>He used to be at least a mostly honest thieving liberal!

The Shatz has taken up Yoorghis' (RIP) crusade to blow up Mt Rushmore?

[Al Czervik]

On 10/25/2017 11:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
> a425couple <a425c...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:osqba...@news4.newsguy.com:

>
>> On 10/24/2017 3:01 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>>
>> So here, Bill Shatzer, descending into madness, declares
>> that since POTUS Trump, along with POTUS Obama and
>> currupt Clinton, tell falsehoods,
>

> Well, that's a step...

Next time you need to have your aorta roto-rootered remember that your
buddy Al may have helped designed that life saving technology.

Or, you can choose not to risk it...


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Curt Portland]

On 10/21/2017 9:41 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
> Yet more Russian disinformation.