clarify about pager exposure data
39 views
Skip to first unread message
garup lambang goro
Mar 15, 2018, 8:00:13 PM3/15/18
to OpenQuake Users
Dear members,
I have downloaded a pager exposure data from platform.openquake.org for use in risk analysis s the attached csv. But I'm worried about whether the column have been exported correctly. The column at the end under the heading bldg_cost_quality is empty. When I compare the values in the other columns with the header descriptions, it looks to me like the data under the type_pop column are missing, and all the remaining columns have been shifted to the right, leaving the empty column at the end under bldg_cost_quality.
Would it be possible for someone to please look at this file and confirm to me whether the mistake I have described above has happened? (I mainly want to know whether I can still use the data, with the assumption that the columns have been shifted).
Regards,
Garup
I have downloaded a pager exposure data from platform.openquake.org for use in risk analysis s the attached csv. But I'm worried about whether the column have been exported correctly. The column at the end under the heading bldg_cost_quality is empty. When I compare the values in the other columns with the header descriptions, it looks to me like the data under the type_pop column are missing, and all the remaining columns have been shifted to the right, leaving the empty column at the end under bldg_cost_quality.
Would it be possible for someone to please look at this file and confirm to me whether the mistake I have described above has happened? (I mainly want to know whether I can still use the data, with the assumption that the columns have been shifted).
Regards,
Garup
Daniele Viganò
Mar 20, 2018, 6:12:00 AM3/20/18
to openqua...@googlegroups.com
Dear Garup,
are you sure you have imported the CSV correctly? The CSV must be splitted on commas, and doing that the columns are filled correctly. I've attached an XLSX genereated with LibreOffice from you CSV file: as you can see the 'bldg_cost_quality' contains always a value (2).
Best regards,
Daniele
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenQuake Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openquake-use...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
DANIELE
VIGANÒ |
System
Administrator |
Skype dennyv85
|
+39
0382 5169882
GLOBAL
EARTHQUAKE MODEL |
working
together to assess risk
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
garup lambang goro
Mar 20, 2018, 5:11:46 PM3/20/18
to OpenQuake Users
Dear Daniele,
Thank you so much for your explanation. It was very helpful for me. One more thing, I try to look at very carefully the data of column "night_pop" and "transit_pop", it looks to me that the data of column "night_pop" and "transit_pop" was swap (looks less reasonable espesially in non urban area/ urban "false"). Could you please give me explanation about that?
Thank so much,
Best regards,
Garup
Thank you so much for your explanation. It was very helpful for me. One more thing, I try to look at very carefully the data of column "night_pop" and "transit_pop", it looks to me that the data of column "night_pop" and "transit_pop" was swap (looks less reasonable espesially in non urban area/ urban "false"). Could you please give me explanation about that?
Thank so much,
Best regards,
Garup
garup lambang goro
Mar 20, 2018, 6:12:52 PM3/20/18
to OpenQuake Users
Dear Daniele,
No..No... I am sorry, I was wrong, the data on column "day_pop", "night_pop" and "transit_pop" are reasonable, even in non-urban area.
Very good, Thank you so much,
No..No... I am sorry, I was wrong, the data on column "day_pop", "night_pop" and "transit_pop" are reasonable, even in non-urban area.
Very good, Thank you so much,
Best regards,
Garup
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:00:13 AM UTC+11, garup lambang goro wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages