> Does anyone have an Async implementation of PG'OCaml's functor argument [1]. I tried:
> (...)
I've never used Async, so I won't be able to help you directly. I do however have
a somewhat related question: is PG'OCaml's reliance on Batteries a big turn-off for
users of Async/Core? I imagine it might, which is why I'm considering dropping the
Batteries dependency. It turns out there's only a couple of Batteries functions we
actually use, so it might be worth just copy + pasting them into PG'OCaml if that
means one fewer big dependency. (Yes, code duplication is evil, but so is scaring
away a huge chunk of potential users...)
Best regards,
Dario Teixeira