As expected, some of our respected colleagues "get" this and others don't.
Marcos and Symeon - you get it and you just like other IDEs. That's great. I like VS Code too and use it for other purposes. It's a real IDE, unlike Notepad++ which is just an extended text editor. I look forward to contributing to your effort if you publish as FOSS.
Pedro - you get it and I look forward to your FOSS collaboration.
Bill - you don't get it. This wasn't intended to be competitive, commercial, a discussion about the relative merits of Notepad++, or an invitation for your commercial offering. Some might recognize the irony of my criticism of that. At some point I realized I was doing exactly that with a couple of my offerings, recognized the lack of taste, and stopped doing it. Hey, we learn, we change, we move on.
This was not an attempt to promote Notepad++ as a suitable alternative to serious tools. I really don't care about Notepad++. I use Notepad++ as a replacement for Notepad - never for real development. I do encourage people to use VS Code, Eclipse, or RedaktorIDE when they're looking for that next step up.
What this IS, is that someone was generous enough to start a new FOSS project and I picked up on it and contributed back. I respect that some guy took the time to offer some FOSS for people who DO like Notepad++ and for people who DO like to use something lighter than a full IDE and the bewildering variety of plugins and config settings for some or all development. This is just an offering, just cuz, not a "statement" about preference or about what works best.
This community has gotta stop crapping on alternatives because the world is a very diverse place. The more we try to narrow options the more we narrow down this entire industry. The rest of the world thrives on diversity, choice, extensibility, plugins, addons, and FOSS to make it all happen. Our industry in general seems to eschew FOSS, and gravitates toward a MV-only, BASIC-only, DIY, NIH perspective. (Of course that does Not apply to many here.)
As a perfect example, FOSS is so ignored that Kevin dumped the cool
http://foss4mv.net/ domain and Glen Bachelor gave up his noble FOSS efforts long ago. We've had
https://bitbucket.org/foss4mv/ for a few years now with almost no contributions - and I consider just USING the code a contribution. I didn't publish MVBASIC++ at Bitbucket because I didn't want it to get lost with all of the other cool code there.
Sure, there are alternatives. That's Not what this was about. What I would hope to see, but wouldn't dream of it in this industry, is a number of people coming together in an effort to replace wED in Accuterm, which many of us use all the time. (And that would be just one option for this, not the only one.) That's not a threat to AccuTerm. This is what people do with other platforms in the world. It's a statement in support of a favorite terminal emulator - with acknowlegement that if wED isn't going to go any further then we can thank it for its legacy and pick up where it left off. FYI, wED isn't "built-in" to MV. wED simply uses a client/server interface built over AccuTerm. ANY UI including Notepad++ can do the same with the same fluid exchange of data. That's where I'd like to take this little FOSS project. Just for fun.
So let's start over. Who wants to have some fun?
T