- Revision
- 7017
- Author
- rossmason
- Date
- 2007-06-09 04:07:00 -0500 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007)
Log Message
While trying to fix the Http Polling test case, I found a bug in Lifecycle Management. Pairing up lifecycle phases fixed this becuase we can now reliably say that if somthing is stopped, then start can be called again on the object. I got no feedback on the lifecycle email so I took silence as acceptance :). Added some JavaDoc to lifecycle objects.
+1 from me on your proposal, making the lifecycle phases symmetrical makes sense. We should update the diagram at some point.
Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Perepelytsya <aper...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sat, June 9, 2007 12:25 pm
To: d...@mule.codehaus.org
Subject: [mule-dev] Re: [mule-scm] [mule] [7017] branches/mule-2.x/core/src/main/resources: While trying to fix the Http Polling test case, I found a bug in Lifecycle Management.
I just recently got to the point where I can ask specific technical
questions on lifecycle. This revision may have changed things, but what I
noticed was that after calling managementContext.dispose() the call to
managementContext.isDisposed() returned false (it no longer uses the flag).
Will check with the latest and add a test case in case it's still relevant.
Andrew
On 9 Jun 2007 09:07:01 -0000, ross...@codehaus.org <ross...@codehaus.org>
wrote:
>
> Revision 7017 <http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/mule/?cs=7017>
> Author rossmason Date 2007-06-09 04:07:00 -0500 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) Log
> Message
>
> While trying to fix the Http Polling test case, I found a bug in Lifecycle Management. Pairing up lifecycle phases fixed this becuase we can now reliably say that if somthing is stopped, then start can be called again on the object. I got no feedback on the lifecycle email so I took silence as acceptance :). Added some JavaDoc to lifecycle objects.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit: