"Poul-Henning Kamp" <p...@freebsd.org> wrote in message
news:<29877.980850630@critter>...
>
> I have made mount_mfs and vnconfig print a warning and sleep for 15
> seconds before continuing.
>
> Please convert to using mdconfig(8) for TMPFS uses.
>
> March 1st I will remove the functionality from mount_mfs and
> vnconfig, leaving only the message which will be an error obviously.
>
> April 1st I will remove vn, vnconfig and mount_mfs entirely.
Could these modifications be ported to -STABLE to ease up the transition
from -STABLE to -CURRENT ? I don't know if this is tied deeply on other
changes in -CURRENT, but if it is not I'd like to use the new facility.
Let me know if you want me to do some testing prior to committing the
changes to -STABLE. I will happily contribute any help I can.
Patrick.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>Could these modifications be ported to -STABLE to ease up the transition
>from -STABLE to -CURRENT ? I don't know if this is tied deeply on other
>changes in -CURRENT, but if it is not I'd like to use the new facility.
I think I would rather leave -stable out of this for now. There are
too many deployed production systems I think.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> >Could these modifications be ported to -STABLE to ease up the transition
> >from -STABLE to -CURRENT ? I don't know if this is tied deeply on other
> >changes in -CURRENT, but if it is not I'd like to use the new facility.
>
> I think I would rather leave -stable out of this for now. There are
> too many deployed production systems I think.
Just to make my intentions clear, I am not asking to remove
vn/vnconfig(8)/mfs from -STABLE, I was just asking for the inclusion of
md/mdconfig in -STABLE so that people (at least me :) ) can get ready for
the day 5.0 will becomes -STABLE...
My other problem is that I use vn's heavily and I find that some of their
limitations are really annoying. While I could hack the relevent code to
make myself happy, I think that there is little value in me doing that when
it is obvious that they are going away in the not so distant future (5.0).
Anyway, this is not a big deal.
Patrick.
I think we should postpone the complete removing for a year
(on release of 5.2), to give people a migration sugar.
System upgrading (4.x -> 5.x) will cause confusing situation,
for example, living old 4.x vnconfig binary and
new and splendid mdconfig.
--
Motomichi Matsuzaki <mz...@e-mail.ne.jp>
Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan
> At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:30:30 +0100,
> Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > March 1st I will remove the functionality from mount_mfs and
> > vnconfig, leaving only the message which will be an error obviously.
> > April 1st I will remove vn, vnconfig and mount_mfs entirely.
> I think we should postpone the complete removing for a year
till
> (on release of 5.2), to give people a migration sugar.
==
Otherwise
> System upgrading (4.x -> 5.x) will cause confusing situation,
^
> for example, living old 4.x vnconfig binary and
together
> new and splendid mdconfig.
^
phk> March 1st I will remove the functionality from mount_mfs and
phk> vnconfig, leaving only the message which will be an error obviously.
Before March 1st, src/release/Makefile, src/release/scripts/doFS.sh,
src/release/texts/FLOPPIES.TXT, and some PicoBSD stuffs need some work
to convert from vnconfig(8) to mdconfig(8).
Is Anybody working on this?
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA