-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ctm <
ctm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Roger: Yes, you could.
>
> Will it not be more efficient and reliable if the broker did
> it?
>
The broker is doing it. Or do you want add extra code just used
for this single purpose, instead of reusing the existing code for
an existing function? That sounds way more reliable.
Cheers,
Karl P
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=kHDB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----