info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
New Module Proposal: Media
133 views
Skip to first unread message
Chris Double
Jun 1, 2015, 9:03:53 PM6/1/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
Somehow we don't seem to have a Firefox Media module. The Firefox media
team has always operated as if one existed but it occasionally gets
raised that there isn't one. This email is an attempt to resolve that.
The module would be responsible for the development of the HTML 5 media,
video and audio elements and associated APIs such as Media Source
Extensions and Encrypted Media Extensions.
I'd like to nominate Chris Pearce as the module owner. He has been
involved with the Firefox media implementation since near the beginning
of the video/audio HTML support, having worked on all aspects of the
implementation.
As peers I'd suggest Anthony Jones, Matthew Gregan, Edwin Flores,
Jean-Yves Avenard, Gerald Squelart, Ralph Giles, and JW Wang. These
people are already contributors and reviewers for media code.
Name: Media
Description: HTML Media APIs
Module Owner: Chris Pearce
Peers: Anthony Jones, Matthew Gregan, Edwin Flores,
Jean-Yves Avenard, Gerald Squelart, Ralph Giles, JW Wang
Source Dirs: dom/media
Bugzilla Component(s): Video/Audio
Discussion Group: mozilla.dev.media
Please post followup questions/comments to .governance.
team has always operated as if one existed but it occasionally gets
raised that there isn't one. This email is an attempt to resolve that.
The module would be responsible for the development of the HTML 5 media,
video and audio elements and associated APIs such as Media Source
Extensions and Encrypted Media Extensions.
I'd like to nominate Chris Pearce as the module owner. He has been
involved with the Firefox media implementation since near the beginning
of the video/audio HTML support, having worked on all aspects of the
implementation.
As peers I'd suggest Anthony Jones, Matthew Gregan, Edwin Flores,
Jean-Yves Avenard, Gerald Squelart, Ralph Giles, and JW Wang. These
people are already contributors and reviewers for media code.
Name: Media
Description: HTML Media APIs
Module Owner: Chris Pearce
Peers: Anthony Jones, Matthew Gregan, Edwin Flores,
Jean-Yves Avenard, Gerald Squelart, Ralph Giles, JW Wang
Source Dirs: dom/media
Bugzilla Component(s): Video/Audio
Discussion Group: mozilla.dev.media
Please post followup questions/comments to .governance.
Robert Strong
Jun 1, 2015, 9:12:04 PM6/1/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
What is the plan for the Core -> Video/Audio, Video/Audio Recording, and
Web Audio (are there more?) components? Would they be graveyarded?
Robert
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> gover...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
Web Audio (are there more?) components? Would they be graveyarded?
Robert
> governance mailing list
> gover...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
Chris Pearce
Jun 1, 2015, 9:55:03 PM6/1/15
to Robert Strong, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate
bugzilla components, since normally different the people work on these
two chunks of code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've
hardly worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but
Roc normally reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner
I guess.
Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
Chris Pearce.
bugzilla components, since normally different the people work on these
two chunks of code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've
hardly worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but
Roc normally reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner
I guess.
Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
Chris Pearce.
Chris Pearce
Jun 1, 2015, 9:55:26 PM6/1/15
to Robert Strong, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate
bugzilla components, since normally different the people work on these
two chunks of code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've
hardly worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but
Roc normally reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner
I guess.
Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
Chris Pearce.
On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
bugzilla components, since normally different the people work on these
two chunks of code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've
hardly worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but
Roc normally reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner
I guess.
Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
Chris Pearce.
On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
Robert Strong
Jun 1, 2015, 10:02:21 PM6/1/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
What would happen to the existing Core -> Video/Audio component with the
addition of the Firefox -> Video/Audio component you are proposing?
Robert
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate bugzilla
> components, since normally different the people work on these two chunks of
> code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
>
> I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be fine
> with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
>
> I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've hardly
> worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but Roc normally
> reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner I guess.
>
> Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
> webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
>
addition of the Firefox -> Video/Audio component you are proposing?
Robert
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate bugzilla
> components, since normally different the people work on these two chunks of
> code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
>
> I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be fine
> with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
>
> I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've hardly
> worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but Roc normally
> reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner I guess.
>
> Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
> webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
>
Kyle Huey
Jun 1, 2015, 10:04:24 PM6/1/15
to Robert Strong, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
I suspect there's some confusion here between bugzilla components and
governance modules.
- Kyle
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Robert Strong <rst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> What would happen to the existing Core -> Video/Audio component with the
> addition of the Firefox -> Video/Audio component you are proposing?
>
> Robert
>
governance modules.
- Kyle
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Robert Strong <rst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> What would happen to the existing Core -> Video/Audio component with the
> addition of the Firefox -> Video/Audio component you are proposing?
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate
> bugzilla
> > components, since normally different the people work on these two chunks
> of
> > code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
> >
> > I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> > karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
> fine
> > with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
> >
> > I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've hardly
> > worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but Roc
> normally
> > reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner I guess.
> >
> > Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
> > webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
> >
> > Chris Pearce.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
> >
>
> > I think it makes sense to keep WebAudio and Recording as separate
> bugzilla
> > components, since normally different the people work on these two chunks
> of
> > code, and it makes filtering bugmail easier!
> >
> > I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> > karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
> fine
> > with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
> >
> > I don't think I should be module owner of the Recording code, I've hardly
> > worked in that code. Normally people in Taipei work on it, but Roc
> normally
> > reviews patches that land there, so he's the de-facto owner I guess.
> >
> > Also, we should explicitly disclaim ownership of dom/media/webrtc and
> > webrtc related directories; that remains in the "WebRTC Media" module.
> >
> > Chris Pearce.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/2/2015 1:11 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
> >
Chris Pearce
Jun 1, 2015, 10:06:29 PM6/1/15
to Robert Strong
We're not proposing a Firefox -> Video/Audio component. Maybe that
wasn't clear. We will keep using the Core -> Video/Audio component.
Chris Pearce.
wasn't clear. We will keep using the Core -> Video/Audio component.
Chris Pearce.
Robert Strong
Jun 1, 2015, 10:10:14 PM6/1/15
to Chris Pearce, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
Sorry about that and thanks
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> We're not proposing a Firefox -> Video/Audio component. Maybe that wasn't
> clear. We will keep using the Core -> Video/Audio component.
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> We're not proposing a Firefox -> Video/Audio component. Maybe that wasn't
> clear. We will keep using the Core -> Video/Audio component.
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
sque...@gmail.com
Jun 2, 2015, 2:20:58 AM6/2/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
Should we include media/gmp-clearkey in the Source Dirs?
(Maybe others?)
Gerald
(Maybe others?)
Gerald
Ehsan Akhgari
Jun 2, 2015, 8:57:28 AM6/2/15
to Chris Pearce, Robert Strong, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
On 2015-06-01 9:54 PM, Chris Pearce wrote:
> I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
> fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
Web Audio is already a module
> I certainly don't have a deep knowledge of WebAudio or Recording,
> karlt/padenot would be the knowledgeable parties for WebAudio. I'd be
> fine with WebAudio being its own module with one of those two in owning.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Web_Audio>, although I should
probably ask karlt whether he would like to become a peer.
Chris Pearce
Jun 2, 2015, 5:16:27 PM6/2/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
On 6/2/2015 3:33 PM, sque...@gmail.com wrote:
> Should we include media/gmp-clearkey in the Source Dirs?
> (Maybe others?)
Yes, we should claim these subdirs of /media/:
> Should we include media/gmp-clearkey in the Source Dirs?
> (Maybe others?)
gmp-clearkey/
libcubeb/
libnestegg/
libogg/
libopus/
libstagefright/
libtheora/
libtremor/
libvorbis/
libvpx/
omx-plugin/
rlz/
cpearce
yura shelomanov
Jun 5, 2015, 4:27:26 AM6/5/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
вторник, 2 июня 2015 г., 4:12:04 UTC+3 пользователь Robert Strong написал:
Chris Pearce
Jun 10, 2015, 6:48:48 PM6/10/15
to mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
I have added the "Media Playback" module to the modules Wiki.
(I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC module
names also containing "Media").
Chris Pearce.
(I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC module
names also containing "Media").
Chris Pearce.
Andrew McCreight
Jun 10, 2015, 6:55:19 PM6/10/15
to Chris Pearce, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
Should there be some explicit mention that Web Audio isn't included? It is
a little confusing to somebody who doesn't know otherwise.
Andrew
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I have added the "Media Playback" module to the modules Wiki.
>
> (I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC module
> names also containing "Media").
>
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/3/2015 9:15 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>
a little confusing to somebody who doesn't know otherwise.
Andrew
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I have added the "Media Playback" module to the modules Wiki.
>
> (I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC module
> names also containing "Media").
>
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/3/2015 9:15 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>
Chris Pearce
Jun 10, 2015, 6:58:55 PM6/10/15
to Andrew McCreight, mozilla-g...@lists.mozilla.org
I have updated the description to say WebAudio is not included.
Chris Pearce.
On 6/11/2015 10:55 AM, Andrew McCreight wrote:
> Should there be some explicit mention that Web Audio isn't included?
> It is a little confusing to somebody who doesn't know otherwise.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com
> <mailto:cpe...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>
> I have added the "Media Playback" module to the modules Wiki.
>
> (I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC
> module names also containing "Media").
>
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/3/2015 9:15 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> gover...@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:gover...@lists.mozilla.org>
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
>
Chris Pearce.
On 6/11/2015 10:55 AM, Andrew McCreight wrote:
> Should there be some explicit mention that Web Audio isn't included?
> It is a little confusing to somebody who doesn't know otherwise.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Chris Pearce <cpe...@mozilla.com
> <mailto:cpe...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>
> I have added the "Media Playback" module to the modules Wiki.
>
> (I appended "Playback" to the name to disambiguate between WebRTC
> module names also containing "Media").
>
>
> Chris Pearce.
>
>
>
> On 6/3/2015 9:15 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>
> On 6/2/2015 3:33 PM, sque...@gmail.com
> governance mailing list
> gover...@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:gover...@lists.mozilla.org>
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
>
0 new messages