>
> Thanks for the feedback. We would very much like to do so, but we have not
> yet identified another provider which meets our requirements; in addition,
> we don't currently have the developer resources to integrate another
> provider.
>
> That’s not a final decision, just the one we have made for the time being.
>
I wish this was mentioned in the email.
- jsx
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Kadir Topal <
ato...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. We would very much like to do so, but we have not
> yet identified another provider which meets our requirements; in addition,
> we don't currently have the developer resources to integrate another
> provider.
>
> That’s not a final decision, just the one we have made for the time being.
>
> Best,
> Kadir
>
> > Am 18.08.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Bill Gianopoulos <
wgiano...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > I already replied to the email announcing this change to me. I really
> > think this is a bad idea. I can see OK Mozilla is abandoning Persona,
> but
> > requiring people to sign up to something not Mozilla controlled to be
> able
> > to contribute as they wish to the Mozilla project seems to be totally
> > against what Mozilla stands for (or at least what I thought it did).
> >
> > I should start by saying I have a github account so no big deal for me,
> but
> > requiring others who want to contribute to sign up with a non Mozilla
> > related entity to do this is really outside of what I would consider to
> be
> > acceptable. I have been able to contribute to the mozilla development
> > documentation long before personna existed (like from 2001) without
> having
> > to have any non-mozilla based account. This just seem to be wrong on so
> > many levels.