Yeah, I'm going to put more detail in about needinfo. I rushed through
writing the article to get it done so it could be used to answer this
question quickly, and now I need to go and flesh out a couple of details
like that one. Thanks for the reminder!
> One thing Sheppy's guide mentions, but is maybe worth calling out more
> prominently: if you can identify someone with an interest in there
> being good docs for the thing, you can explicitly ask for their
> attention in the bug using the "Needs more information" flag (often
> abbreviated, in traditionally obscure Mozilla-speak, to "NI"):
>
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Contributing#Asking_questions.
>
> For example, suppose an engineering bug has the "dev-doc-needed" flag
> set, indicating that someone thinks that the new feature needs
> developer documentation. If I write some docs for the feature and want
> technical review, I'll generally ask for review from the person who
> fixed the bug, and "NI" them, to get their attention (e.g.
>
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242871#c19).
>
> In your case, it's a bit different, because this is a documentation
> bug, so it's less obvious who's interested in the docs (worse, it was
> filed in 2003(!) so the person filing it might not be interested any
> more). But if I were you, I might NI Marc asking for review, since he
> seems to be interested in the docs for it.