Il 11/04/17 13.03, Michal Stanke ha scritto:
> Well, but Firefox Screenshots project is 5 star on Pontoon, which
> shouldn't be if I understand correctly it is about the same as
> Activity stream, which is 4 only.
Indeed, I moved it to 4 for consistency.
> I understand priorities as what should I do first, if it is not
> completed, regardless the project changes history. If the project is
> 100%, there is nothing to do there and the priority is not important
> for my momentary work. So in case of Pocket, if a new string is added,
> it is 2 star only so I may be still working e.g. on AMO Frontend or
> any project with higher priority than Pocket. But in case Pocket would
> be 4 star, I stop working on AMO Fronted to complete Pocket first.
> Moreover in case someone starts a new language, they won't get to
> Pocket any soon.
>
> So does the priority decision actually takes into account some
> expectations, how likely it is there will be something new in the near
> future too?
As you said, priority is meant to help you prioritize incomplete work at
a specific moment in time.
If you login into Pontoon and need to complete 10 projects, priority
should help you figure out which one is more important in this specific
moment, together with deadlines.
Not sure I can give you an answer always valid to "does priority account
also for the probability of future string updates?", because it depends
case by case. So far, only Pocket falls into that bucket, and that's
only one of the reasons it has a low priority (old strings, updates are
painful and require a lot of time to reach release).
Francesco
>
> --
> Michal Stanke
>
> Dne 11. 4. 2017 12:23 napsal uživatel "Francesco Lodolo [:flod]"
> <
fl...@lodolo.net <mailto:
fl...@lodolo.net>>:
>
dev-...@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:
dev-...@lists.mozilla.org>
>
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-l10n
> <
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-l10n>
>
>