We don't plan on proposing that these are tree/build-blocking tests (at least, initially); merely, that they help the QA team gain ground on testing, coverage, and easier reporting.
Since these won't be part of the build, and while we're proving the technology/coverage/maintainability, etc., what level of review would you feel is necessary+appropriate, for inclusion alongside the apps they test?
We'd like to get this off the ground quickly, so we can get a clearer sense of the benefit + potential "invasiveness" we'll get with these tests.
Here's an example of a sample test that Jonathan Griffin wrote to help guide Web QA to get started:
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/tests/marionette/gaiatest/tests/test_calculator.py
(And, while it's important to get coverage, another goal is to help drive the Marionette framework itself.)
- Stephen
On Monday, October 8, 2012 8:24:58 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote: