It's actually very much surprising, but, at the same time makes sense, since bigger sprites can't be inlined, and at the same time. sprites "eat up" alt tags and other SEO-friendly goodies.
So, what's worse - make server spend some time working a little harder on inlining images (considering that server speed is always is about the same, times spent would be also always the same) or rely on "superfast" Internet connections, which can depend on whether it's raining outside or not?
Here is the research, saying that it can be up to 60% faster not to use sprites with Pagespeed Module: sprites are bad for SEO?!
Jeff Kaufman
unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 9:45:42 AM2/9/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mod-pagespeed-discuss
If you ran an experiment and found that your pages loaded faster with
inlining images instead of spriting then you should go with inlining.
Spriting decreases round trips from N to 1, while inlining decreases
them from N to 0. On the other hand, inline images can do much more
to slow down scripts the rest of your page. This means that there's
not one answer for all sites, and running tests on your site is the
best way to go.