Everything the subhuman negro touches turns to crap.
http://www.newnation.org/ New Nation News
Bunch of damn crying whining babies who never learned how to read.
The message was shown on the screen, which would have been read by anyone
in the audience, of any ethnic background, who can read that is.
The only reason the suit was filed because a certain director of that very
commission who made the ruling to begin with, happened to be there. If it
wasn't for her mouth, no court time would have been granted.
Can't argue with that...2 thumbs up for this post !
Delaware is one wierd state. Black movie audience behavior has been
chronicled by white and black comedians. The movie screen is a giant
TV you talk to. The whole event is interactive. I saw one of the
Star Wars movies in a theater in Philadelphia and that was an
experience and a half.
Your racist comments noted. Had you read the article, you would have
seen that there were no behavior problems with the black audience,
rather, a few felt offended and filed a complaint. Ultimately, the
Delaware Supreme Court decided that there was no discrimination and the
complaint dismissed.
Before calling a group "the subhuman negro" or "unruly negores", please
learn to read the article as well as spell ("negores") so you don't
appear foolish, subhuman yourself or just plain stupid or ignorant.
Jeff
These guys are afraid of one black women walking toward them on a
street. They are intimidated by Michelle Obama. Black males will
cause these guys to soil their adult diapers.
Like a Rocky Horror Picture Show?
No, just a different cultural event, not better of worse. I was not
threatened or felt threatened in the least, but I grew up in
intergrated neighborhoods so I don't have an unnatural fear of non-
whites.
Comedians - I know a lot of people get their news from them, but they
are still not a good source of accurate info.
> The movie screen is a giant
> TV you talk to.
You talk to movie screens?
> The whole event is interactive. I saw one of the
> Star Wars movies in a theater in Philadelphia and that was an
> experience and a half.
Hint: Philadelphia and Delaware are different places. Philadelphia, the
nation's former capital, is in Pennsylvania.
In fact, many of them are extremely accurate barometers of society.
Black movie audience behavior has not been a major subject of comedians
AFIK. And what do you suggest the comedians are measuring?
Sounds like you've seen all comedians in existence, and all of their
routines. Is this the case? Where do you find the time?
No, I just asked Watson. B-)
I asked Google, too. And Google didn't find anything about black
audience behavior in movie theaters. I just hope they don't go a
firehouse and yell, "Movie!".
Where did you get that idea? I haven't seen black audiences as a
subject. I never said that I saw all the comedians. And, find out what
AFIK means.
Meatloaf AGAIN?!?!
Meatloaf AGAIN?!?!
By any reading, your statement about comedians was an overarching one. Now,
sit down and be quiet.
Watch this...........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ7cKYsJLDM&playnext=1&list=PLA80DC5B12F366538
--
JerryD(upstateNY)
This is a fun site for things white.
http://stuffwhitepeopledo.blogspot.com/2008/07/sit-quiety-in-movie-theaters-part-two.html
Excuse me. You're now talking for everyone? Who elected you God? Your
interpretation of my comment was overarching, not my comment.
And don't tell me what to do.
That's a non-sequitur. Just because a comedian can measure society does not
make him an accurate source of information.
Jon Stewart and Steven Cobert are poor sources of information, as is Dennis
Miller. Jon and Steven take a liberal view of things that have happened, and
Dennis is generally conservative, but none of them are accurate sources of
information. An accurate source of information is one that if it was the
only source -- which is an inherently bad thing -- would stand on its own
merits and be supported by common understanding of the majority of the
population.
When one tunes to the Comedy Channel for news stories, then one should not
be discussing world events in public.
But, YOU'RE not racist... No sir, not YOU.
You need to be very informed already to get the jokes on The Daily
Show and the Cobert Report. If anyone comes to those shows uninformed
they have to get informed or they stop watching. Dennis Miller used
to be funny in an unhip mean hipster way, but now he is just flailing
for some kind of show business career.
It doesn't mean they're INaccurate, either. It means they're making
observations which are often true.
> Jon Stewart and Steven Cobert are poor sources of information, as is
> Dennis Miller. Jon and Steven take a liberal view of things that have
> happened, and Dennis is generally conservative, but none of them are
> accurate sources of information. An accurate source of information is one
> that if it was the only source -- which is an inherently bad thing --
> would stand on its own merits and be supported by common understanding of
> the majority of the population.
>
> When one tunes to the Comedy Channel for news stories, then one should not
> be discussing world events in public.
Nobody tunes to Comedy Channel for news stories, and you know it.
How about:
George Carlin
Eddie Murphy
Ron White
Chris Rock
Dave Chappelle
Bill Cosby
Alan King
Don Rickles
Lenny Bruce
Every one of these people has had something edgy, but TRUE to say about
ethnic and/or religious groups. You need to widen your world a bit. But we
already knew that. You live in a cocoon.
> Eddie Murphy
I've never seen him discuss current events.
> Ron White
Who?
> Chris Rock
Not funny.
> Dave Chappelle
Seriously not funny.
> Bill Cosby
Hilarious, but not a source of current events.
> Alan King
He's a news source?
> Don Rickles
Isn't he dead?
> Lenny Bruce
>
He's dead.
> Every one of these people has had something edgy, but TRUE to say about
> ethnic and/or religious groups. You need to widen your world a bit. But we
> already knew that. You live in a cocoon.
You're changing your own discussion. Somebody said that comedians are not a
"source of accurate information." YOU replied that they are a good barameter
of society -- in the context of "accurate information," you affirmed that
they are a good source. Now you are saying something entirely different. It
might be true, but it is different.
You don't know what you're talking about, and don't know what you've said.
This is a bad combination for a guy to have that is speaking in public.
Chris Rock not funny? Dave Chapelle not funny? The most accurate way
to define right and left is humor. You like Larry the Cable Guy,
right?
Lenny Bruce - how to relax your colored friends at parties
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ua0TT87KNwo
Translation....I liked him when he was a liberal but now that
he is a conservative, I don't like him any more.
--
JerryD(upstateNY)
You will now attempt to disagree. As always, you will fail because you are
ignorant, angry and above all, intensely stupid.
Disagreeing with you doesn't make one stupid. Yours is not the only good
interpretation. Get over yourself.
jeff
You need to follow Strickland more closely. If you don't see a trend, you're
as stupid as he is.
Why would I want to follow him?
Thanks for playing. :-)