Is there a difference between randomtestpoints argument and subsetting your own test/train data?
27 views
Skip to first unread message
Lauren Yee
unread,
Jan 19, 2017, 6:25:23 PM1/19/17
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Maxent
Hi all,
I've been using the argument randomtestpoints of 30% for my maxent models, however, I am wondering if there is a difference between doing that and doing what is in the dismo documentation:
# witholding a 20% sample for testing fold <- kfold(occ, k=5) occtest <- occ[fold ==1,] occtrain <- occ[fold !=1,] # fit model, biome is a categorical variable me <- maxent(predictors, occtrain, factors='biome')
Is there any difference or benefits to using one method over the other?
Thanks!
Jamie M. Kass
unread,
Jan 25, 2017, 4:26:18 PM1/25/17
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Maxent
If you use dismo's kfold() with k=5 to randomly partition your occurrence points like you did in your example, and specify randomtestpoints as 20% with maxent.jar, these should be equivalent.