First off, it sounds like you can get good absence data for denning sites. If you have good absence data, a GLM approach (logistic regression) would be preferable to Maxent, as the results would likely be more accurate. If you have no absence data and only presence, Maxent would be a good technique for you to try. One potential problem for you if you use a presence/background approach like Maxent is that the background points may include areas with denning sites you have no explored, and this might bias your results. Further, denning selection is likely largely driven by microclimate preference, and thus your predictor variables must reflect these, maybe in addition to large-scale climate variables too. There are more things to consider, obviously, but I don't want to delve too far into it before you consider other techniques. Have you looked into resource selection functions? I think the literature there may have more behavioural studies. Just a thought. But I don't see any big, red warning flags for using Maxent to predict suitable areas for bear denning sites.
Jamie Kass
PhD Student
City College, NY