On May 26, 2016 09:20, "michel paul"
> Simultaneously, I understand that learning how to use a graphing calculator is much more important than being able to study the Collatz conjecture through code you've created. Yeah, I completely understand - choices have to be made.
>
> --
> Michel
Learning what every button does on a scientific calculator is good review, like exploring math and cmath modules in Python standard library.
However holding kids back with 1900s tools is no solution to the "left behind" crisis. But was solving that ever the goal?
I understand the US at least is really just wanting to give the rest of the world more of a chance to get ahead. It's all about altruism and helping the disadvantaged doncha know. 😋
I sure hope students agitate for a true "lambda calc track" (whatever we wanna call it). They stand to lose the most if we settle for adults' collective inertia. They should know when they're being bilked in exchange for all that precious chair time.
Fortunately, history suggests enlightened self interest is a real motive, despite neuroscience evidence that we're often irrational in how we pursue it. Trial and error works, provided people are allowed to address past mistakes honestly and learn from them.
Kirby