Linda,
Thanks for watching the 99 second video, and responding here.
You are right that the video does not show the gestures (except it looks like something is manipulating things in the Triangle). I could have filmed me handling the app, but would not have gotten the same audio quality, or the STEREO sound!
I'd love to make a longer in-depth video with longer samples of more complex sequences. (And I may do that.) But trying to get people to watch more than 90 seconds is a stretch these days. The patterns I chose were all "orbits" or regular repeating loops because I wanted people to get a sense of the rhythm it can produce. (At the risk of appearing simple and repetitive.) All the "waiting" polygons had settings in them from previous play. I just went from one polygon button to the next, and literally recorded the video in one take without any editing.
I think if you look at the material on
polygonjazz.com you'll get more of an idea how simple this is, and yet how complex the sequences can be. Each polygon has a number (infinite actually) of characteristic orbits due to geometry, and "in between" those orbits are transitions that have amazing structure and variety. Consider, for example, what will happen at 61º in a pentagon?
When I first published Geom-e-Tree, it was going great till some kid posted a review that he had seen everything the app could do after three minutes and got bored. Then the sales tanked! So you work for a year and some kid wipes you out in an instant. :^( And he probably didn't take the time to figure out what all the app could do.
These things take time. I have spent hours with the app and am still fascinated You hear different patterns at different tempos even though it's the same sequence.
I'd gladly send you or any others on MathFutures a "promo code" that covers the download cost of 99 cents! Just pop me a note!
John