Geometry for the Poetry of Moods

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrius Kulikauskas

unread,
Jan 4, 2017, 4:58:55 PM1/4/17
to mathf...@googlegroups.com
Joseph, Bradford,

Thank you for your replies to my letter.

I'm curious, what is geometry?

And what are the origins of geometry?

I think that the origins of geometry may lie in the boundary between
self and world. I have submitted the following abstract for the
conference "Phenomenology of Emotion":
http://www.pheno.ulg.ac.be/colloques/201704-emotion/en/

I already gave a talk in Lithuanian
http://www.ms.lt/sodas/Mintys/20161029Nuotaik%C5%B3Aplinkyb%C4%97s
and a related talk in English
http://www.ms.lt/sodas/Book/TaxonomyOfMoods
and a post at Math Overflow:
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1953312/is-this-set-of-6-transformations-fundamental-to-geometry
and a talk at the Klaipeda Science and Art Festival
http://www.vda.lt/lt/klaipedos-fakultetas/naujienos/festivalis-restart-ir-susitikimas-su-matematikos-mokslu-daktaru-andriumi-kulikausku

---------------------------------------------------
Geometry for the Poetry of Moods
---------------------------------------------------

The physical sciences leverage our ability to distinguish between
thousands of colors, sounds, smells, tastes and other sense perceptions.
Let us likewise consider the thousands of moods which we experience and
how we might evoke, reproduce, compare, identify and name them, and in
general, make sense of their variety. We start with a model of basic
emotional responses which arise from our expectations. This model
suggests a profound boundary between self and world. We further note the
negative moral tones which arise when we expect what we do not wish.
Positive moral ambiences resound when these negative moral tones are
rendered impossible. We then study how the mood evoked by a poem can be
accounted for by a specification of the boundary between self and world.

We proceed by imagining various circumstances and perceiving the
emotional responses they evoke within us. A variant of Paul Ekman's
basic set of innate emotional responses can be derived from outcomes of
our expectations. In matters that are distant, that we locate outside
ourselves, if our expectations prove wrong, then we are surprised,
whereas if our expectations are met, then we are excited. If we try but
fail to form expectations, then we are frightened. Analogously, in
matters that are personal, and that we invest in ourselves, if our
expectations prove wrong, then we are sad, whereas if they prove right,
then we are content. If we try but fail to form expectations, then we
are disgusted. Aside from these six outwardly observable outcomes by
which we learn and know, we can also intuit two internal states by which
we do not know but wait. Namely, we are in suspense when we are waiting
if our expectations will be met, and we are at peace inasmuch as we do
not try to form expectations.

Should we seek peace or happiness? We may avoid sadness by manipulating
our expectations. However, negative moral tones arise when we expect
what we do not wish, and thus experience not suspense but anxiety, not
surprise but anger, not sadness but hatred, not excitement but relief
and not happiness but depression. If we refuse to expect what we do not
wish, then hate is impossible and we feel love. If we do not acknowledge
any world outside of us, then fright is impossible and we feel intimacy.
If we lose awareness of our selves, then disgust is impossible and we
feel beauty. We do not feel love, intimacy or beauty directly, but as
the lack of hate, fright and disgust, thus as afterglows.

Let us analyze the moods evoked by 37 Chinese wu-jue poems from the Tang
dynasty. In each poem, the mood is defined by the boundary between self
and world, for example, the bed that a traveler lies in. Beyond the bed
is the beauty of the moon and the surprising illusion of frost, but also
the traveler's happy home, which evokes a conditional sadness. Here we
imagine ourselves reflected across the boundary. Mathematically, a
geometry of paths-forward is enriched by reflection to become a geometry
of lines-back-and-forth. We can have even richer geometries of
angles-around and areas-encircled. The 37 poems each apply one of six
specifications (reflection, shear, rotation, dilation, squeeze,
translation) to enrich our geometry (affine paths-forward, projective
lines-back-and-forth, conformal angles-around, symplectic areas-encircled).

We thus read poems constructed to evoke moods such as:

* Conditional sadness, as by reflection, when we affect our own mood
with lines-back-and-forth.
* Inadequate empathy, as by shear, when our mood is affected by
another's perpendicular mood, in that we do not know and feel all that
they do.
* Comprehension, as by rotation, when our mood is directed by another's
mood.
* Suspense on resolving to grow, as by dilation, when our mood is
expanded by the overall atmosphere.
* Respectfully declining to laugh, as by squeeze, when the overall
atmosphere constrains our mood to choose.
* A growing fear of feeling like a stranger among one's own, as by
translation, when our mood transports us within an atmosphere.

We may thus apply geometry and poetry to explore moods and share a
regard for the boundary of self and world.


Andrius

Andrius Kulikauskas
VGTU Lecturer
m...@ms.lt
+370 607 27 665

Joseph Austin

unread,
Jan 6, 2017, 9:50:22 AM1/6/17
to mathf...@googlegroups.com
Andrius,

Although I have no credible qualifications to speak on this topic,
it's always been my opinion that we do things for "feelings", then justify them with "reasons".
Of course, the feelings must come from somewhere. Perhaps the behaviorists are on the right track:
we seek what brought "pleasure" and avoid what brought "pain".
The advantage of being human is that we can employ our rational faculties
to predict possible future states from imagined responses to present circumstances,
then enlist the "feeling" of that future state to motivate present action.

A friend in management consulting observes that most faulty decisions come,
not from invalid reasoning, but from positing unrealistic choices: e.g. "I can have my cake and eat it too."
The successful decision-maker is one who can eliminate unrealizable choices from consideration.
On the other hand, the successful con can persuade you to overrule your reason with the intensity of the feeling
of an outcome "too good to be true."

Whatever that may I have to do with geometry is a stretch.
I suspect the geometric transformations you identify can all be accounted for as experiential,
in that they occur in the natural process of correlating stereoscopic vision with 3-dimensional locomotion.
Recall Stephen Lehar's work in Geometric Algebra.

Joe Austin
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MathFuture" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mathfuture+...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to mathf...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mathfuture.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Andrius Kulikauskas

unread,
Jan 27, 2017, 9:43:07 AM1/27/17
to mathf...@googlegroups.com
Joseph,

Thank you for your reply. I think you make a lot of sense.

I've recently been collecting and documenting my "concerns", large and
small, in every day life. I'm finding it very good data for describing
the life I life. How do concerns arise, transform, affect other
concerns, and disappear?

For example, breathing, in general, is not a concern, when it takes
cares of itself. And some decisions are made directly without
developing into concerns, for example, while driving. What I mean by
concern seems to require a discontinuity in space and time as to when I
can address it. A concern is when I make something important, when I
call it to my attention so that I would deal with it at the appropriate
time and place. Because of this, it has an expectation and an emotional
charge. And just as you describe, it does seem to get attributed a
"reason" for why we are concerned.

I'm currently interested in modeling these concerns and the associated
reasons. I think they form a sort of logic, an algebra or calculus.

Andrius

Andrius Kulikauskas
VGTU Lecturer
+370 607 27 665
Eiciunai, Lithuania

metaimagem

unread,
Feb 7, 2017, 8:56:25 AM2/7/17
to mathf...@googlegroups.com
Hi Andrius, do you know this book?

© 2015

5000 Years of Geometry

Mathematics in History and Culture

Authors: Scriba, Christoph J., Schreiber, Peter

  • Offers in-depth insights on geometry as a chain of developments in cultural history
  • Provides useful tables that reflect major historical and cultural developments and parallel advances in geometry
  • Includes interesting exercises with a historical background
  • Presents colorful illustrations and original texts from different eras of cultural history

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MathFuture" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mathfuture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Andrius Kulikauskas

unread,
Feb 7, 2017, 10:06:49 AM2/7/17
to mathf...@googlegroups.com
Metaimagem,
No, I did not. It seems interesting and relevant. Thank you!
Andrius


2017.02.07 15:30, metaimagem rašė:
> Hi Andrius, do you know this book?
>
> https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783034808972
> Free Preview <https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783034808972#>
> © 2015
>
>
> 5000 Years of Geometry
>
>
> Mathematics in History and Culture
>
> Authors: *Scriba*, Christoph J., *Schreiber*, Peter
>
> * Offers in-depth insights on geometry as a chain of developments in
> cultural history
> * Provides useful tables that reflect major historical and cultural
> developments and parallel advances in geometry
> * Includes interesting exercises with a historical background
> * Presents colorful illustrations and original texts from different
> eras of cultural history
>
>
> 2017-01-04 19:05 GMT-02:00 Andrius Kulikauskas <m...@ms.lt
> <mailto:m...@ms.lt>>:
> m...@ms.lt <mailto:m...@ms.lt>
> +370 607 27 665
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MathFuture" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to mathfuture+...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:mathfuture%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to mathf...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:mathf...@googlegroups.com>.
> <https://groups.google.com/group/mathfuture>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MathFuture" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to mathfuture+...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:mathfuture+...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to mathf...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:mathf...@googlegroups.com>.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages