All:
Once again, I agree with Frank: any ‘statewide voting’ on this issue will yield the Monarch for our State butterfly and that this is simply something we’d have to accept. In my view this would be, if less interesting, at least not the worst of choices. It’s also now apparent that there’s already action in-the-works on this so I also agree with Bill/Madeline that the club should focus on simply making our best recommendation, and to this end, I agree with Sue that a Club info packet would be a good way to facilitate this.
If hands-on-factors such as raise-and-release are weighed-in on this to help for educational purposes, I’m concerned however that a number of ‘popular’ suggestions so far get bad scores and I include here a [admittedly very short] list of a few examples based on my raising experience of 60 years. Score 1-10 with 10 best.
Monarch 10
Black swt 9 (Points on this already have been made)
Mourning cloak 3 (Egg/cat finds too unpredictable most seasons)
Red Sptd Purp 3 (Egg/cat finds too unpredictable most seasons)
Spicebush swt 6 (Hostplants an issue but cats usually easy to find if on hand)
G S Frit 0 (Eggs/cats almost impossible to locate)
Don Adams
All
Statewide voting would only yield Monarch only if Monarch is on the ballot. I think the MBC should chose the candidates for which that people/students will vote. There should be a list of traits to qualify a butterfly for consideration. Some could be required traits and others traits could be incorporated into a scoring system. I recommend that two traits be required 1) no other state has already selected the butterfly, 2) the butterfly overwinters in the state as an egg, larva, pupa, or adult. These criteria would eliminate Monarch, Mourning Cloak and Black Swallowtail from consideration.
Other criteria for consideration and scoring but not for disqualification would be 3) statewide distribution, 4) ease of identification, 4) accessibility (is it easy or hard to find due to habitat), 5) ability to be raised in captivity (many schools already do this for certain butterflies, e.g. in Shrewsbury they have raised both Monarchs and American Lady from caterpillars), 6) appeal/attractiveness plus any others club member think are important.
I think that at most 4 butterflies should be on the ballot. Offering 2 would allow the majority to chose. Any other method would likely result in the majority losing their choice. A vote that involves each voter choosing their candidates in order of preference might be better than casting a single vote.
The MBC would select the finalists and provide fact sheets for each candidate butterfly, including common name, scientific name, flight dates, overwintering method, interesting facts, photos/artwork, etc.
Of course before proceeding, we really need to find out if the Girl Scouts have already selected a butterfly and if the legislature is set to vote on it.
Bruce deGraaf
Shrewsbury, MA
All;
OK, I see some good ideas surfacing here. Bruce makes an excellent point that the raise-release attribute is already being served by the Monarch, Pl, and [I would have added to this list] Sats, so perhaps it doesn’t need to be applied, with great rigor at least, to the State butterfly choice. However, unless I’ve missed something, Bruce’s idea needs more detail on exactly how the Club would ‘take command’ of the balloting process if others are already involved with different ideas about what can be left off??
Don Adams