I usually prefer to let discussions like that in Hackernews develop. After, to the accusation of a bias in favor of Marpa, I must plead guilty. :-)
I think having a clear POV is important, and the literature has suffered from a Dragnet style "Just the math, please" approach. I think that's part of what's left the field so confused -- people don't state what they're trying to do, and why they're preferring the particular approach that they are. Grune and Jacobs was IMHO a step in the right direction.
I think my clearly stated POV gives the reader a start, and the careful references enable him to delve deeper, and draw his own conclusions.