Tom Bacon
Graduate GIS Engineer
Asset Management South
Tel: 01444 472380
www.mouchel.com
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "MapInfo-L" group.To post a message to this group, send
email to mapi...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, go to:
http://groups.google.com/group/mapinfo-l/subscribe?hl=en
For more options, information and links to MapInfo resources (searching
archives, feature requests, to visit our Wiki, visit the Welcome page at
http://groups.google.com/group/mapinfo-l?hl=en
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail may be solely those of the author and are not necessarily those of Mouchel. Mouchel Limited, Registered in England at Export House, Cawsey Way, Woking, Surrey, UK, GU21 6QX Registered No : 1686040
For free? No, that would be software piracy. I'm not sure, but you may still be able to get a license for 7.5 from Pitney Bowes...
Ah - I still keep 8.0 around. That's my vote for the best version!
I think it's permissible to run an older version as long as you have a
license for a version >= to that version. But I'm not a lawyer...
--
Richard Greenwood
richard....@gmail.com
www.greenwoodmap.com
-----Original Message-----
From: mapi...@googlegroups.com [mailto:mapi...@googlegroups.com] On
--
Gentreau,
That is certainly a reasonable question, but I will guess that the
answer is 'no' because the PBBI business model needs to encourage
users to move to new versions. And helping developers support older
versions is contrary to that business model, which is unfortunate. But
MapInfo certainly has better backward compatibility than many software
that are based on the "new version" business model. And when they
don't/can't support and older version they tell you so. For example,
try opening any ESRI file created in a newer version and you'll be
greeted with "Error opening file XYZ" which always stumps me because I
figure the file is corrupt or some such thing. MapInfo has the good
grace to say something to the effect of "Can not open file XYZ,
version ABC of MapInfo can" so at least you know what you're problem
is.
Having said that, and being an occasional developer myself, it's a
pity that we as a community can't provide some mechanism for testing.
Like a public Amazon AMI with multiple versions of MI installed. If
you wanted to test your app you would spin up an instance, pay for
your time at $0.12/hour, and terminate it when you were done.
Maintaining a public AMI costs $0.10/GB/month for storage so a 20GB
Windows AMI would cost $24/year.
In my view, the only compelling reason for PBBI to allow acquisition of an
older version of MapInfo Professional would be to allow developers of
extensions to MI to test that their products functioned with those older
versions.
Also, in my view, it is to their advantage that existing licensed users of
the older versions get satisfaction from the product they are using, rather
than moving to another non-PBBI product (rather than buying a newer version
of MapInfo Professional, even at upgrade pricing).
So, added functionality to the every-day users' (say) MapInfo v6.0 or 7.5 -
provided by developer extensions - would benefit rather than harm the PBBI
'business model'.
'Products' might be both a saleable MBX (or other extension), or one made
available free to the community.
But if I were making such decisions for PBBI, I would require the applicants
for such licensing to jump through some hoops, to prove that they were
offering something worthwhile.
Ian Thomas
Scientific Software
Why is it you need version 7.5 in particular?