--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google "LoadRunner" group.
To post to this group, send email to LR-Loa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
LR-LoadRunne...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/LR-LoadRunner?hl=en
dear chaitanya,
in such kinf of situation where should we start ??
For the love of god:
NO.
If you see anything take more than 10 seconds to reply, let alone 120
seconds - your problem is not settings, nor is it your script.
Increasing the download timeout because you get errors in a loadtest
is not going to make things better. 120 seconds as a responsetime is
(almost) never acceptable.
Therefore: congratulations, you broke the system under test.
Now that you have found that that system cannot handle the load you
are putting on it you should start asking the hard questions, and stop
fiddling with scripts or settings until you have answers.
Ask yourself:
Is the load at which this error occurs within the range of load the
system under test expects?
If not: Why?
Regards,
Floris
---
'Many people asked me if I was afraid to fly and implied that I should
have stayed home, close to family and friends. I replied that if I had
stayed home, the terrorists would have won.
Unfortunately, my government does not agree with my definition of
winning. They think that living in fear and trying desperately to keep
us all 100% safe while flying is the most effective way to fight
terrorism. It reminds me of a boss that told me he liked it when
people lived in fear of being fired, they worked harder. I told him
being fired held no fear for me. When you live in fear, you do
irrational things - like sending millions of people's shoes through an
xray scanner every day.'
-- Stormy Peters
--
Find out why it is slow. Do not change the standard for 'slow.'
James Pulley, http://www.loadrunnerbythehour.com/PricingMatrix
--
I am very surprised. Why:
1) Do so many people seem to find that an acceptable answer?
2) Do those same people persist in suggesting that answer even when it
has both already been suggested before AND burnt to a crisp by someone
else?
(namely: me)
Especially question number one is a real brainbreaker. It speaks
volumes about the person writing that. Obviously whoever is writing
that considers themselves to be an educated person, yet their whole
attitude seems to be one of denying problems by covering them up by
enlarging silly settings.
Or is it just an attitude of "Errors are bad, must fix?".
I don't get it.
Sent from my iPhone