I use the term point when teaching but not on a step sheet. It is easier to say point front, side, back. I think everyone understands what we mean by point and I will keep using it. I agree with you.
Joey Prieur
Very precise and well explained. A point is with leg straight and extended.
Joey
I would definitely like to see someone follow up with Peter at Kickit for sure. I just wrote up a line dance and I feel stifled by not being able to use the term “point” – to me it has significant interpretation which differentiates it from the Touch family … the concept of the leg being straightened is a good part of the definition (thank you, Donna).
We all also use/see “Cross, Point” or “Point, Cross” and it doesn’t leave much to the imagination to figure out that the term “Point” means to “touch away” and if Peter’s purpose is to use fewer words, then I think this is a case in point (pardon the pun) … whereby we can say “Point Side” and everyone knows the implication, but if we stick to using “Touch”, then we are obliged to clarify the definition by using even more words “Touch right to the right side with straight leg” or “Touch right toe to right side” … whereas “Point Right” says it all…
Vivienne, you have my vote if you want to bring it up with Peter. Thanks.
Karen Tripp
I have another point of contention with Peter’s revised “how to write a step sheet” article and would like to known how others feel about this.
On the subject of Rock-Recovers.
He says “If there is a turn between the two, then it is not called a Rock-Recover. It is a step-turn with a weight change, i.e.
1-2 Step right forward, turn ¼ left (weight to left)
Not
1-2 Rock right forward, turn ¼ left and recover to the left
Guilty! I have written dances with “Rock, Recover ¼ Right” … and I personally don’t see anything wrong with it. Otherwise we’d have to change the “symmetry” of a series of steps … where the first section might be Rock Rt Forward, Recover, Back Shuffle, but the reverse with a turn in it can’t be “Rock Back, Recover ¼ Turn right, Side Shuffle”. He would want that written as follows:
Rock right forward, Recover Left, Back Shuffle right-left-right
Step left back, turn ¼ right (weight to right), Side Shuffle left-right-left
And yet, that second “Step Back, Turn right and take weight” is supposed to FEEL like a Rock Back, Recover ¼ Right.
I think I would interpret the steps differently if it wasn’t a “rocking” action any longer, it would be more ‘mechanical’. When teaching a sequence like this, it’s easy to explain that the Rock Forward, Recover, Back Shuffle is the first 4 counts, and the OPPOSITE footwork with an added ¼ turn is in the next 4 counts. Dancers can relate to doing something twice and slightly changing the second set of counts.
But if you take ability to use the term “rock” … I don’t know. Seems to me that in trying to “use fewer words” or “standardize”, choreographers are going to run into problems if they can’t express their dance the way they want. I can’t see me writing the second half of my 8 counts saying “Step Left Back (like a rocking action, Turn ¼ right and step right)” … because even the most inexperienced dancer is going to say, “Why don’t you just say Rock Back, Recover ¼ Right?”
Oh – and I forgot – he wants us to use “chassé” for our shuffles.
Sigh.
Karen