Thanks I think I am on the right track then;
I attached a graph showing the counts as a fraction for some forest
The x axis is the normalized z value for the vegetation in meters and the y axis is the fraction of counts
The orange line is from the normalized height vegetation data
I tried to normalize the data further with the grey line by:
Using lasinfo to find the average spacing for the ground last returns (In my mind this method would fairly distribute all the vegetation returns): lasinfo -lof height.txt -merged -nh -nv -nmm -cd -last_only
The result was 0.65m spacings with 2.3msq density
Then I intended to average out all the returns using this calibration using lasthin -lof height.txt -drop_classification 2 -central -step 0.65 -odir "c:tiles" -olaz
Then to get my histogram I used lasinfo -lof thinned.txt -merged -nh nmm -nv -cd -histo z 1 -o hist_5.csv
Was this an appropriate use of the -central function? Did the central function average and centralize the data in that grid to the step value both in horizontal and vertical directions?
I noticed I cant generate an intensity histogram after doing this?
Regards
Cam