> The "vote" column -- number of active users, as opposed to total
> number of installations -- is probably the most appropriate.
>
> Pro: Counting the popularity of specific compilers and interpreters
> avoids ambiguity with C/C++/C#, Lisp, Scheme, etc.
Yeah, very precise results.
> Con: This seems like it would count the number of people who have
> installed a given compiler/interpreter. Actually, I think it also
> counts packages that are a dependency of something else (e.g. CouchDB
> depends on Erlang), which could inflate interpreted languages. But
> that might be a useful indicator, too, if a language is popular and
> useful enough to be used as the basis for other popular software.
I think the biggest 'con' is that we already have something of a free
software bias, between freshmeat, google code (which certainly doesn't
list code locked up in some bank), and I'm hesitant to add to that.
It is a good idea, however.
--
David N. Welton